Peer Review History: Building a Collective Brand: A Solution to Enhance the Quality and Value of ha Long Shrimp Floss Products in Quang Ninh

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Alfredo Jimenez Palmero, Kedge Business School, France.

Reviewers:

(1) Tasawar Iqbal, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan.

(2) Sheenu Arora, Tecnia Institute of Advanced Studies, India.

(3) P. S. Venkateswaran, PSNA College of Engineering and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Amir Baradaran , Khayyam University of Mashhad, Iran.

(2) Frah Rukhsar Khan, Limkokwing University of Creative Technology, Malaysia.

(3) Sandeep Bhanot, University of Mumbai, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.43/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Tasawar Iqbal, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sheenu Arora, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (P. S. Venkateswaran, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impact of Dietary Neem Leaf Powder on Antibody Titre against Ranikhet Disease in Japanese Quail

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sanjay Mishra, SR Institute of Management & Technology, Lucknow, U.P, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Umair Ahmad, The University of agriculture Peshawar Pakistan, Pakistan.

(2) Suja C.S, Kerala Veterinary and Animal Science University, India.

(3) Abeer El-Metwally, Cairo University, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Umair Ahmad, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Suja C.S, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Abeer El-Metwally, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Genetic Divergence Analysis Using Mahalanobis D² Statistics in Black Gram [Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper]

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Hon H. Ho, State University of New York, New Paltz,  USA.

Reviewers: 

(1) Gangadhara Doggalli, India.

(2) Arvind Kumar, India.

(3) Divyesh Vasava, India.

(4) Asit Prasad Dash, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Aladji Abatchoua Madi Madi Ibram, University of  Ngaoundéré, Cameroon.

(2) Komal Shekhawat, College of Agriculture, Swami Keshwanand Rajasthan, Agricultural University, India.

(3) Manoj K. L. Das, T.U, Nepal.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Gangadhara Doggalli, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Arvind Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Divyesh Vasava, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Asit Prasad Dash, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Efficacy of Jack Fruit extract (Artocarpus heterophyllus) on Haemonchus contortus

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Eman Hashem Radwan, Damanhour University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) W M K M Ratnayake, Sri Lanka.

(2) Parita Mangroliya, Parul Institute of Technology, India.

(3) Sana Noor, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.86/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (W M K M Ratnayake, Sri Lanka) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Parita Mangroliya, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sana Noor, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Re-Review report_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Re-Review report_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Re-Review report_3_v1 (No res) | NA | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Drought-induced variation in Photosystem II activity and Chlorophyll index: Implications for yield performance in mulberry genotypes

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sanjay Mishra, SR Institute of Management & Technology, Lucknow, U.P, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Sarhan Ahmed Soliman, Agriculture Economy Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center (ARC), Egypt.

(2) Lamiaa Mahmood Salman AlFreeh, Basrah University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sarhan Ahmed Soliman, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Lamiaa Mahmood Salman AlFreeh, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Role of Private Health Schools in Addressing Workforce Shortages: A Case Study of the “Le Bouctou” Network in Mali

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Tin-Chun Lin,  Indiana University Northwest, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Vahid Ranaei, AJA University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

(2) K. Madan Gopal, National Health Systems Resource Centre, India.

(3) Celestine Emeka Ekwuluo, Ukraine.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anamika Choudhary, Dr Shakuntala Misra National Rehabilitation University, India.

(2) Susmiati, Universitas Kadiri, Indonesia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Vahid Ranaei, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (K. Madan Gopal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Celestine Emeka Ekwuluo, Ukraine) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Predictive Role of Anthropometric Parameters in Diagnosing Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Among Young Adults in Rivers State, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Wagih Mommtaz Ghnnam, Mansoura University Hospital, Egypt .

Reviewers:

(1) Büşra Durak, Hitit University, Turkiye.

(2) Jyoti Prakash Sahoo, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, KIIT University, India.

(3) A. K. M Shahidur Rahman, Bangladesh Medical University (BMU), Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Gajanan P Kulkarni, Symbiosis International Deemed University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Büşra Durak, Turkiye) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jyoti Prakash Sahoo, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (A. K. M Shahidur Rahman, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Human Health Risk Assessment of Iron in Petroleum-Polluted Soil Amended with Agro-Wastes

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vincenzo Tufarelli, University of Bari ‘Aldo Moro’, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) R.Vijayalakshmi, Madras University, India.

(2) Chinonso Godwin Okoyeaniche, Rochester Institute of Technology, United States.

(3) Ogunrinola Olabisi Olufunmilayo, Lagos State University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (R.Vijayalakshmi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Chinonso Godwin Okoyeaniche, United States) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ogunrinola Olabisi Olufunmilayo, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparative Assessment of Indoor Air Quality in Residential Environments of Urban Centre and Petroleum–Producing Communities in Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Pradip K. Bhowmik, University of Nevada Las Vegas, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Srinidhi S U, REVA University, India.

(2) Ganjar Samudro, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia.

(3) Phuntsho Dendup, Bhutan.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.76/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Srinidhi S U, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ganjar Samudro, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Phuntsho Dendup, Bhutan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Secure Telemedicine Image Encryption Using NSPSO-Optimized S-Boxes and a Hybrid Logistic–Sine Chaotic Map

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fabricio Moraes de Almeida, Federal University of Rondonia, Campus de Porto Velho, Brasil.

Reviewers:

(1) Biresh Kumar, Amity University Jharkhand, India.

(2) Zahraa A. Jaaz, Al-Nahrain University, Iraq.

(3) Arun Upadhyaya, Shri Madhwa Vadiraja Institute of Technology and Management, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Biresh Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Zahraa A. Jaaz, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Arun Upadhyaya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA