Peer Review History: Investigating the Moisture Sorption Behavior of Biscuits under Controlled Humidity Conditions

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ghulam Khaliq, Lasbela University of Agriculture, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Prajya Arya, Institute of Good Manufacturing Practices India (IGMPI), India.

(2) Vinay G M, Anand Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anilkumar R Chaudhari, MIDFT, India.

(2) Gayathri Sanyasi, Andhra University, India.

(3) Manal Mohammed El-Sayed Mohammed Shehata, Zagazig University, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Prajya Arya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Vinay G M, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised MS v1 and Feedback v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Integrating Digital Applications with Occupational Therapy: A Case Study on Behavioral Changes in Children with ASD

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sanjay Mishra, SR Institute of Management & Technology, Lucknow, U.P, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Amir Soliman, Delta University For Science And Technology, Egypt.

(2) Abraham Ngor Achiek, Texila American University, South Sudan.

(3) Cristianne Confessor Castilho Lopes, University of the Joinville Region, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Amitkumar Subhashrao Manekar, SSGMCE, SGBAU, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Amir Soliman, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Abraham Ngor Achiek, South Sudan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Cristianne Confessor Castilho Lopes, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised MS v1 and Feedback v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Nutritional and Antioxidant Comparison of Finger Millet, Foxtail Millet, and Refined Wheat Flour

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohd Saidin Misnan, Universiti Teknologi, Malaysia.

Reviewers:

(1) Aqsa Qayyum Chatha, University of Illinois, United States.

(2) Sudana Fatahillah Pasaribu, Institute Kesehatan Helvetia, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Oladapo Ajala, Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Aqsa Qayyum Chatha, United States) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sudana Fatahillah Pasaribu, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised MS v1 and Feedback v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: CRISPR-Cas9 Applications in Horticultural Crop Improvement

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Fawzy Ramadan Hasssanien, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, KSA.

Reviewers:

(1) Arnab Mandal, Vidyasagar University, India.

(2) Byomkesh Dash, ICAR-National Rice Research Institute, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) K. Priyatham, SKUAST-J, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Arnab Mandal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Byomkesh Dash, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised MS v1 and Feedback v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Leveraging AI in Drug and Substance Abuse Recovery: A Systematic Approach to Reintegration and Rehabilitation for the Homeless

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ashish Anand, Montgomery Veteran Affairs Medical Center, Jackson, MS, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Precious Ojo Uahomo, University of Port Harcourt, Nigeria.

(2) Aftab Hussain, Riphah International University, Pakistan.

(3) Anmol Lama, Visva Bharati University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ferydoon Khamooshi, University of Zabol, Iran.

(2) Lalita Devi, Guru Nanak Dev University, India.

(3) Rahmat Pannyiwi, Defense University of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Precious Ojo Uahomo, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Aftab Hussain, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Anmol Lama, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised MS v1 and Feedback v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: From Tradition to Modernity: China’s Education System ‘‘A Product of Legal Design”

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Tin-Chun Lin, Indiana University Northwest, USA.

(2) Dr. Abdullah Aydin, Kırşehir Ahi Evran University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Tuti Suartini, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia.

(2) Ashokkumar Baldevbhai Prajapati, Soorajba College of Education, Kadi Sarva Vishwavidyalaya-Gandhinagar, India.

(3) Ritu Sharma, University Of Jammu, India.

(4) Doris Muthoni Nthuku, Masinde Muliro University of Science and Technology Kenya, Kenya.

(5) Avitesh Vaishnavi Nayak, Sushant University, Gurugram, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anjali Patwardhan Kulkarni, India.

(2) Onyango Benard Okelo, Kisii University, Kenya.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Tuti Suartini, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ashokkumar Baldevbhai Prajapati, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ritu Sharma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Doris Muthoni Nthuku, Kenya) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_5 (Avitesh Vaishnavi Nayak, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised MS v1 and Feedback v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised MS v2 and Feedback v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Revised MS v3 and Feedback v3 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of Trend Dynamics of Lentil Crop in India using Statistical Models

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ghulam Khaliq, Lasbela University of Agriculture, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) N. Gnanasankaran, Thiagarajar College, India.

(2) Anju Sharma, Dr Y S Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, India.

(3) Rajarathinam Arunachalam, Manonmaniam Sundaranar University, India.

(4) Arijit De, KPR Institute of Engineering and Technology, Affiliated to Anna University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (N. Gnanasankaran, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Anju Sharma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Rajarathinam Arunachalam, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Arijit De, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised MS v1 and Feedback v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Genetic Diversity Analysis of Grain Yield and its Attributing Traits in Different Genotypes of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Hon H. Ho, State University of New York, New Paltz, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Maria Andrea Esposito, Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Agropecuaria (INTA), Argentina.

(2) Ranju Kumari, MBAC, Agwanpur, Saharsa, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Chandramaniya Chiragkumar Pravinbhai, Anand Agricultural University (AAU), India.

(2) Rajni Devi, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Maria Andrea Esposito, Argentina) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ranju Kumari, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised MS v1 and Feedback v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Nutritional Enhancement and Organoleptic Assessment of Gluten-free and Millet-based Murukku Fortified with Chia Seeds (Salvia hispanica L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ghulam Khaliq, Lasbela University of Agriculture, Water & Marine Sciences, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Shubham Thapa, HNBGU (A Central University), India.

(2) Annalakshmi Chatterjee, University of Calcutta, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Agbaje Rafiu, Kwara State Polytechnic, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shubham Thapa, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Annalakshmi Chatterjee, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised MS v1 and Feedback v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Swine Wastewater Treatment on Fungal Population and Physicochemical Characteristics of Soil

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Anil Kumar, Devi Ahilya University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) M. Mohan, Mahendra Engineering College, India.

(2) Kshitij Dhameliya, RK University, India.

(3) Abu Imran Mallick, West Bengal State University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Denis M.K. Amara, Njala University, Sierra Leone.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.17/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (M. Mohan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kshitij Dhameliya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Abu Imran Mallick, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised MS v1 and Feedback v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA