Peer Review History: Corpus-Based Study on the Translation Methods of the Figures of Speech in Zhuang’s Folk Songs of Napo

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Palle E. T. Jorgensen, Professor, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Jerry Idah Odeh, Benue State University, Nigeria.

(2) Gabriel Oche Ukah, Alvan Ikoku Federal University of Education, Nigeria.

(3) Maria-Ana Tupan, Universitatea Alba Iulia, Romania.

(4) Bouregbi Salah, Badji Mokhtar University, Algeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.12/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jerry Idah Odeh, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Gabriel Oche Ukah, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Maria-Ana Tupan, Romania) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Bouregbi Salah, Algeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A pH Measurement of Acetic Acid-Sodium Acetate Buffer Solutions Using a pH Meter at Ambient Temperature

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Pradip K. Bhowmik, University of Nevada Las Vegas, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) ABM Mahfuz ul Alam, Bangladesh.

(2) Seham S. Alterary, King Saud University, Saudi Arabia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (ABM Mahfuz ul Alam, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Seham S. Alterary, Saudi Arabia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Multi Time Series WA-LSTM-Adam for Water Level Forecasting in Center Vietnam

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Qiankun Song, Professor, Chongqing Jiaotong University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Sanjay Sharma, Natinal institute of Technology, India.

(2) P. Chitra, Agni College of Technology, India

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sanjay Sharma, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (P. Chitra, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Digital Literacy Education: A New Approach to Cultivating 21st Century Key Competencies

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Shi-Hai Dong, Professor, Superior School of Physics and Mathematics, National Polytechnic Institute, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Juan Cordovilla, Ecuador.

(2) Muskan Jindal, Baba Mastnath University, India.

(3) Mohd Abad, Aligarh Muslim University, India.

(4) Pornchai Jedaman, Rajabath Mahasarakham University, Thailand.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Maryam Kamaie, Azad University of Shiraz, Iran.

(2) Tahany Abdelhady Abdelrazek Kol, Menoufia University, Egypt.

(3) Zaid Yacoub Mousa Abu-Bajeh, National University College of Technology, Jordan.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Juan Cordovilla, Ecuador) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Muskan Jindal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Mohd Abad, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Pornchai Jedaman, Thailand) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Harnessing Genomic Resources and Molecular Breeding Techniques for Advancing Crop Resilience and Productivity

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Fawzy Ramadan Hasssanien, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, KSA.

Reviewers:

(1) Jephta Mensah Kwakye, USA.

(2) Kartik Pramanik, Centurion University of Technology and Management, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jephta Mensah Kwakye, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kartik Pramanik, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Preparation of Value Added Cow Milk Lassi Blended with Custard Apple (Annona squamosa L.) Pulp

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Golubkina Nadezhda Alexandrovna, All-Russian Institute of Vegetable Breeding and Seeds Production, Moscow region, Russia.

Reviewers:

(1) C. Mabel Joshaline, Arul Anandar College, India.

(2) Rashmi Atul Joshi, Patanjali Research Foundation, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Charith Amidha Hettiarachchi, National Institute of Health Sciences, Sri Lanka.

(2) Shaik Abdul Hussain, ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (C. Mabel Joshaline, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rashmi Atul Joshi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised MS v2 and Feedback v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Critical Peer Feedback for Oral Presentation at TEFL Tertiary Education: Comparison, Perception and Reflection

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Tin-Chun Lin, Professor, School of Business and Economics, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Catherine Nguoi Chui Lam, Politeknik Ibrahim Sultan, Malaysia.

(2) Nur Syafiqah Yaccob, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Agung Prasetyo Wibowo, Universitas Gunadarma, Indonesia.

(2) Nor Omaima Haurn, Malaysia.

(3) Shee Yuen Ling, University of Malaya, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Catherine Nguoi Chui Lam, Malaysia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nur Syafiqah Yaccob, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Phthalate Esters in Water and Surface Sediments of Anambra River in Dry Season: Distribution and Human Health Risks Assessment

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinayaka K.S, Assistant Professor and Hod, Sri Venkataramana Swamy College, D.K. Karnataka, India.

Reviewers:

(1) P. Lakahmi Devi Menon, Calicut University, India.

(2) Poonam Prakash Patil, Sanjivani College of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ivana Kostic Kokic, University of Nis, Serbia.

(2) José Belisario Leyva Morales, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo (UAEH), Mexico.

(3) Md. Shahid Khan, Jahangirnagar University, Bangladesh.

(4) M.V.Raju, Vignan’s Foundation for Science Technology and Research, India.

(5) Poonam Prakash Patil, India.

(6) Shahid Khan, Jahangirnagar University, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (P. Lakahmi Devi Menon, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Poonam Prakash Patil, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: In silico Analysis and Characterization of the F5H Gene Family in Sorghum bicolor and Its Role in Lignin Production

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Hon H. Ho, Professor, State University of New York, New Paltz, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Fathur Rachman, Indonesian Oil Palm Research Institute, Indonesia.

(2) Osama Alam, Institute of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, Zhejiang University, China.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Fathur Rachman, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Osama Alam, China) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Phenotypic Selection of Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Elite Lines for Diseases Resistance and Yield Potential

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Afroz Alam, Banasthali Vidyapith, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Asma Mahjoub, Biotechnology Center of Borj Cedria, Tunisia.

(2) Manoj Kumar Saini, Chaudhary Sarwan Kumar Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Asma Mahjoub, Tunisia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Manoj Kumar Saini, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA