Peer Review History: Early Years Educators’ ICT Competence, Attitude, Perceived Benefits and Challenges of Integrating Digital Storytelling Package in Instruction in Southwest, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Dr. Abdullah Aydin, Kırşehir Ahi Evran University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Ainomugisha Dickens, Kyambogo University, Uganda.

(2) Pranaykumar Vinodbhai Patel, R.H. Patel English Medium B.Ed. College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ainomugisha Dickens, Uganda) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Pranaykumar Vinodbhai Patel, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Theoretical and Experimental Analysis of Propellantless Propulsion Using Resonant Cavity Interactions, Quantum Field Effects, and Advanced Optimization

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Palle Jorgensen, University of Iowa, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Jesse Daniel Brown, AASU, USA.

(2) Anuj Kumar, Mahamaya Government Degree College, India.

(3) Kundan C Patil, India.

(4) Hedara Rachida, Algeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jesse Daniel Brown, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Anuj Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Kundan C Patil, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Hedara Rachida, Algeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised MS v1 and Feedback v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impact of Family Dysfunction on Suicidal Ideation in Students of the Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, URSE

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sanjay Mishra, SR Institute of Management & Technology, Lucknow, U.P, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Bhondwe Meghraj Ramchandra, Dr. Balasaheb Vikhe Patil Rural Medical College, India.

(2) Razaw Noori Hama Faraj, Iraq.

(3) Mehwash Kashif, Karachi Medical and Dental College, Pakistan.

(4) Jolly John OV, Rajagiri College of Social Work (Autonomous), India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Eman Elsheshtawy, Mansoura University, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.37/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Bhondwe Meghraj Ramchandra, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Razaw Noori Hama Faraj, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Mehwash Kashif, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Jolly John OV, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised MS v1 and Feedback v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A review of status and conservation of Lion-tailed Macaques (Macaca silenus) in Southern Western Ghats, Kerala

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Eman Hashem Radwan, Damanhour University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Honnavalli N. Kumara, India.

(2) Tulio Costa Lousa, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Charles Kivasu Maingi, Kenya Institute of Primate Research, Rutgers University, Kenya.

(2) Genet Berhe Gebrezgiher, Mekelle University, Ethiopia.

(3) Shinde Vinod Anantrao, Shankarrao Chavan Mahavidyalaya, Swami Ramanand Teerth Marathwada University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Honnavalli N. Kumara, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Tulio Costa Lousa, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Role of Serverless Architectures in Revolutionizing FinTech Solutions

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Dariusz Jacek Jakobczak, Chair, Technical University of Koszalin, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Chinmay Avinash Anaokar, Georgia Institute of Technology, USA.

(2) Aanchal Nigam Verma, Lucknow Public College of Professional Studies, India.

(3) Gopi Desaboyina, SEI Investments, USA.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Alwahidin, Indonesia.

(2) Arman Riazi, Iran.

(3) Laxminarayana Korada, United States.

(4) Piyush Ranjan, A.P.J. Abdul Kalam Technical University, USA.

(5) Vibhuti Shivam Dube, Babu Banarasi Das University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Chinmay Avinash Anaokar, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Aanchal Nigam Verma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Gopi Desaboyina, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Optimizing Candidate Selection for Global Projects Using the K-Median Problem Combined with the Genetic Algorithm (GA)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vincenzo Tufarelli, University of Bari ‘Aldo Moro’, Italy.

(2) Dr. Meng Ma, Anhui University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) S. Manikandan, E.G.S. Pillay Engineering College, India.

(2) Sana Khalid Abdul Hassan, University of Baghdad, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Shashikant Verma, National Institute Of Technology Raipur, India.

(2) Syed Zegham Taj, National University of Science and Technology, Oman.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (S. Manikandan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sana Khalid Abdul Hassan, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised MS v1 and Feedback v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Pharmaceuticals and Therapeutic Potentialities of Melissa officinalis L. –A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sinan Ince, Afyon Kocatepe University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Jayashri Yuvaraj Jadhav, Sundarrao More Arts, Commerce and Science College, University of Mumbai, India.

(2) Sanjoy Shil, BCKV, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jayashri Yuvaraj Jadhav, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sanjoy Shil, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised MS v1 and Feedback v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History:

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Hon H. Ho, State University of New York, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Avneet Kaur, GGDSD College, India.

(2) Noé Anes García, University Oviedo, Spain.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Avneet Kaur, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Noé Anes García, Spain) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA