Peer Review History: How are the Physico-anatomical Properties of Original Bark Different from Regenerated Bark? – A Novel Evidence for Sustainable Harvesting of Arjuna

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jichao Sun , China University of Geosciences, China.

Reviewers:

(1) R.L.Manisha, Osmania University, India.

(2) Mugdha A. Joshi, IVM’s Krishnarao Bhegade Institute of Pharmaceutical Education & Research, India.

(3) Oluwole Owoyemi, Glasgow Caledonian University, United Kingdom.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (R.L. Manisha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mugdha A. Joshi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Oluwole Owoyemi, United Kingdom) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Posted in Review History.