Peer Review History: Effects of feeding system (Pelleted diet vs. Forage-based diet) on grosswth performance and carcass characteristics of grasscutter (Thryonomys swinderianus)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fabricio Moraes de Almeida, Federal University of Rondonia, Brasil.

(2) Dr. Wagih Mommtaz Ghnnam, Surgery Department, Mansoura University Hospital, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Wavhal Nilam Pandurang, Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University , India.

(2) Arjuna Apparao Adari, Dr.VS Krishna Govt. Degree College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ahmed Fathy Hassan Seioudy, Animal Production Research Institute, Egypt.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Wavhal Nilam Pandurang, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Arjuna Apparao Adari, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Ethnobotanical Survey of Medicinal Plants Used in the Management of Common Diseases in Ogbia Local Government Area, Bayelsa State, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Chan-Min Liu, Jiangsu Normal University, P.R. China.

Reviewers:

(1) Latif Ahmad, China.

(2) S. Y. Sabo, University Of Jos Nigeria, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Irene Kamanja, Egerton University, Kenya.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Latif Ahmad, China) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (S. Y. Sabo, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Machine Learning for the Detection of Fake News on Social Media: A Critical Narrative Review of Methods, Evaluation Validity and Deployment Readiness

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Dariusz Jacek Jakobczak, Technical University of Koszalin, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Peace Aludogbu, New Mexico State University, USA.

(2) Santosh Swarnakar, MIT Art, Design and Technology University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) B. Suresh kumar, Saraswati Group of Colleges, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Peace Aludogbu, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Santosh Swarnakar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Rapid Micropropagation Using Nodal Explants of Bacopa monnieri (L.) Pennell: An Endangered Medicinal Plant

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinayaka K.S , Sri Venkataramana Swamy College, Karnataka, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Harshit Jangid , JNKVV, India.

(2) Alaa Mohammed Hasan, University of Baghdad, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Pagolu Vishnu Sri Suma, India.

(2) Ullas Prasanna S., Dayananda Sagar University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Harshit Jangid, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Alaa Mohammed Hasan, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Estimation of Combining Ability in Early Genotypes of Pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.]

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Hon H. Ho, State University of New York, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Radhey Shyam Singh, BAU, India.

(2) Kuna Karthik, Dr. Y.S.R. Horticultural University, India.

(3) Subhashree Das, Odisha University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Hamdy M. Abdel-Rahman, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Radhey Shyam Singh, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kuna Karthik, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Subhashree Das, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Artificial Intelligence in the Optimisation of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor agonist Therapy for Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes: A Critical Narrative Review of Treatment Monitoring and Clinical Decision Support

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Giuseppe Murdaca, Immunology Unit, University of Genoa, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Farnaz Roshanmehr , Imam Khomeini Hospital, Iran.

(2) Jyotsna Pandit Khedkar, NES’s Gangamai College of Pharmacy, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Farnaz Roshanmehr, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jyotsna Pandit Khedkar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Artificial Intelligence and Digital Platforms in Language Education at Bangladeshi Higher Education Institutions: A Critical Narrative Review of Evidence, Mechanisms and Structural Constraints

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Antonio Jesús Molina Fernandez, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.

(2) Dr. Stan Weeber, McNeese State University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Safa Naji Abed , University of Babylon, Iraq.

(2) Raaid Jabbar Kurji , Open Educational College, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abhirup Bhadra, Srinath University, India.

(2) Getachew Endale Reta, Woldia University, Ethiopia.

(3) Jane Irene PJ Antony, Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, Malaysia.

(4) Juanda,M.Hum, Universitas Negeri Makassar, Indonesia.

(5) Jusak Patty, Pattimura University, Indonesia.

(6) Pavan Kumar Nowbattula, Sagi Rama Krishnam Raju Engineering College (A), India.

(7) Thanakit Ouanhlee, California Intercontinental University, USA & Thipsamai Research Institute, Thailand.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Safa Naji Abed, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Raaid Jabbar Kurji, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised MS v2 and Feedback v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: From Prototype to Classroom: A Scoping Review of the Effectiveness and Translational Readiness of AI-Enabled Educational Interventions for Autistic K–12 Learners

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Dr. Abdullah Aydin,Kırşehir Ahi Evran University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Samira Nazari Ghazvini, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

(2) Kenneth Besigomwe, Makerere University, Uganda.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Sharmistha Dey, Brainware University, India.

(2) Faith Hauwa Oluwapamilerin Kolo, University of the Cumberlands, United States.

(3) Jawad K. Ali, University of Technology, Iraq.

(4) Nirmala Shivram Padmavat, Nutan Mahavidyalaya, SELU, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Samira Nazari Ghazvini, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kenneth Besigomwe, Uganda) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Revised MS v2 and Feedback v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of Locally Available Biological Soil and Water Conservation Materials in the Western Zone of Tigray, Ethiopia

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Eugene A. Silow, Irkutsk State University, Russia.

Reviewers:

(1) Aabil Husain, Prestige Institute of Management & Research, India.

(2) Mohamed YACOUBI, SAGE HYDRO, Morocco.

Additional Reviewers:

(1)  Ebrahim Yousefi Mobarhan, Semnan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Iran

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Aabil Husain, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mohamed YACOUBI, Morocco) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Haemorrhoidal Disease Across the Care Continuum: A Critical Narrative Review of Pathophysiological Mechanisms, Clinical Classification and Evidence-Based Management

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Giuseppe Murdaca,Internal Medicine, University of Genova,Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Lokendra Pahadiya, INDIA.

(2) Carlos S Ruggeri, Buenos Aires University, Argentina.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Jay Devraj Kansara, Republic of India.

(2) Samer kneber, Baghdad Medical City, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.6/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Lokendra Pahadiya, INDIA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Carlos S Ruggeri, Argentina) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA