Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Valentin Marian Antohi, “Dunărea de Jos” University of Galați, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Hsiu-Jung Chou, Cheng Shiu University, Taiwan.

(2) Baqer Khudair Al-Hadrawi, Al-Furat Al-Awsat Technical University, Iraq.

(3) Millicent Adanne Eze, University of Abuja, Nigeria.

(4) Zhiguo Yao, Lishui University, China.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) A.A.M.D. Amarasinghe, Sabaragamuwa University of Sri Lanka, Sri Lanka.

(2) Mohammed Nabeel. K, Presidency University, India.

(3) Setiasih, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Bhakti Pembangunan, Indonesia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.875/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hsiu-Jung Chou, Taiwan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Baqer Khudair Al-Hadrawi, Iraq) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Millicent Adanne Eze, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Zhiguo Yao, China) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised MS v2 and Feedback v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinayaka K.S, Sri Venkataramana Swamy College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Ravi Ranjan Kumar, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

(2) P Krubaa, Periyar Maniyammai Institute Of Science And  Technology, India.

(3) Antonio Pereira Júnior, University of the State of Pará, Brasil.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Subhrajit Ray, Odisha University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ravi Ranjan Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (P Krubaa, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Antonio Pereira Júnior, Brasil) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinayaka K.S,, Sri Venkataramana Swamy College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Ibanibo Tamunotonye Sotonye, Rivers State University, Nigeria.

(2) Prachi Ugle, India.

(3) Tasnia Bahar Chowdhury, University of East Anglia, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.625/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ibanibo Tamunotonye Sotonye, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Prachi Ugle, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Tasnia Bahar Chowdhury, Bangladesh) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ajit Govind, National Institute of Agricultural Research [INRA], France.

Reviewers:

(1) Anthony Meli, University of Malta, Malta.

(2) B. Babu, Indra Ganesan College of Engineering, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Jane Wandia Githui, University of Nairobi, Kenya.

(2) M.Hemalatha, Sree Rama Engineering College, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Anthony Meli, Malta) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (B. Babu India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Remmiya Rajan P., University of Calicut, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Ananthaneni Madhuri, Andhra Loyola College, India.

(2) AR. Annadurai, Alagappa University College of Arts and Science for Women, India.

(3) Umar Muritala Omeiza, University of East London , Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Birca Alic, Academy of Economic Studies of Moldova, Republic of Moldova.

(2) Pooja Kumari, Jain Deemed To Be University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.76/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ananthaneni Madhuri, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (AR. Annadurai India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Umar Muritala Omeiza, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Pradip K. Bhowmik, University of Nevada Las Vegas, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) A.K. Sharma, Anand Agricultural University, India.

(2) Hisworo Ramdani, Trilogi University , Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) TIŢA Mihaela Adriana, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Romania.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (A.K. Sharma, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Hisworo Ramdani, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Nicolás Padilla Raygoza, Institute of Public Health from Guanajuato State,, México.

Reviewers:

(1) Dumitru Gabriela, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi, Romania.

(2) Ali Abed Sadoon, University of Warith Al-Anbiayaa, Iraq.

(3) Ruchika Yogesh, Matestlab Inc., India.

(4) Hasanain Abdulhameed Odhar, Al-Zahrawi University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Batool Mutar Mahdi, University of Baghdad, Iraq.

(2) Hairul Azman Bin Mohd Hata, Malaysia.

(3) G. M .Monirul Islam, US-Bangla Medical College Hospital, Bangladesh.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.17//10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Dumitru Gabriela, Romania) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ali Abed Sadoon, Iraq) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ruchika Yogesh, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Hasanain Abdulhameed Odhar, Iraq) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised MS v2 and Feedback v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Yi-Ren Hong, Kaohsiung Medical University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Tabinda Ruby, Federal Urdu University of Arts, Sciences and Technology , Pakistan.

(2) Wissam Sajid Hashim, Al-Muthanna University, Iraq.

(3) Putu Austin Widyasari Wijaya, Indonesia.

(4) Nand Kishor Prasad Sah, Teerthanker Mahaveer University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Jeevan R. Rajguru, CCRD Delight Institute of Pharmacy, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Tabinda Ruby, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Wissam Sajid Hashim, Iraq) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Putu Austin Widyasari Wijaya, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Nand Kishor Prasad Sah, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised MS v2 and Feedback v2 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Wagih Mommtaz Ghnnam, Mansoura University Hospital, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Mary loreen v. Cayabyab, University of Northern Philippines, Philippines.

(2) Aatish Kumar Sahu, GIET University, , India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Adane Akate, Obuda University, Hungary.

(2) Asha Sohal, The NorthCap University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mary loreen v. Cayabyab, Philippines) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Aatish Kumar Sahu, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinayaka K.S, Sri Venkataramana Swamy College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Tasawar Iqbal, University of Agriculture, Pakistan.

(2) K. Lavanya, Andhra University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Devendra Kumar, India.

(2) Khuspe Pankaj Ramdas, Shriram Shikshan Sanstha’s College of Pharmacy, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Tasawar Iqbal, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (K. Lavanya, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA