Author Archive: ikpress

Peer Review History: Ecological Risk Assessment of Soils Contaminated with Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and Polychlorinated Biphenyls in Industrial Sites of Rivers State, Nigeria

Posted on by

Editor(s):
(1) Dr. Mohd Saidin Misnan, Universiti Teknologi, Malaysia.

Reviewers:
(1) Ali Hammoud Raheef Al-Shammari, Al-Muthanna University, Iraq.
(2) Vandita Srivastava, Kanahiya Lal D.A.V.P.G. College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ali Hammoud Raheef Al-Shammari, Iraq) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Vandita Srivastava, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Utilisation of Oyster Shells Powder for Modification of Acidic Oilfield Produced Water for Reuse and Re-injection

Posted on by

Editor(s):
(1) Dr. Sanjay Mishra, SR Institute of Management & Technology, Lucknow, U.P, India.

Reviewers:
(1) S. Balamurugan, Bharathidasan University, India.
(2) Ruzkiah Asaf, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (S. Balamurugan, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ruzkiah Asaf, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Prevalence of Carbapenem Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Isolates among Pregnant Women of Rural Areas from Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India

Posted on by

Editor(s):
(1) Dr. Anil Kumar, Devi Ahilya University, Khandwa Road, India.
(2) Dr. Chung-Jen Chiang, China Medical University, China.

Reviewers:
(1) Fatima Moeen Abbas, University of Babylon, Iraq.
(2) Devesh Nitinkumar Joshi, GMERS Medical College, Gujarat University, India.
(3) Guliko Kiliptari, University Hospital Kipshidze, Tbilisi, Georgia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Muhammad Rizwan, Government College University Faisalabad, Pakaistan.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Fatima Moeen Abbas, Iraq) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Devesh Nitinkumar Joshi, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Guliko Kiliptari, Georgia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised MS v1 and Feedback v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised MS v2 and Feedback v2 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Studies on Genetic Divergence in Different Genotypes of Indian Mustard [Brassica juncea (L.) Czern and Coss]

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinayaka K.S, Sri Venkataramana Swamy College, Karnataka, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Chetariya Chana P., Lovely Professional University, India.

(2) Eggadi Ramesh, Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalaya, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Waikhom Jupiter Singh, South Asian Institute of Rural and Agricultural Management (SAIRAM), India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Chetariya Chana P., India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Eggadi Ramesh, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Optimized DNA Isolation Protocol from Pearl Millet (Pennisetum glaucum) Leaves with High Phenolic and Metabolite Content

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Hon H. Ho, State University of New York, New Paltz,  USA.

Reviewers:

(1) V.Satyanarayana, M.A.M College of Pharmacy, India.

(2) Worachot Saengha, Mahasarakham University, Thailand.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (V.Satyanarayana, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Worachot Saengha, Thailand) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Standardization of Media for Seed Germination and Seedling Growth of Garcinia indica: An Endemic and Threatened Plant of Western Ghats, India

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinayaka K.S, Sri Venkataramana Swamy College,  Karnataka, India.

(2) Dr. Vinayaka K.S, Sri Venkataramana Swamy College,  Karnataka, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Bhanu Murthy K C, Dr.YSR Horticultural University, India

(2) Taras Pasternak, University of Freiburg, Germany.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5+8+8+6=30.5/4=7.625

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Bhanu Murthy K C, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Taras Pasternak, Germany) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | J. ch from JOGAE to JOBAN | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Testing the Weak Form Efficient Market Hypothesis: An Interpretive Study of Market Efficiency Via Literary Logic and Evidence

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Guanghua Han, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Malokhat Sultanova, University of Debrecen, Hungary.

(2) Lakshmi A.S, Coimbatore Institue of Mnanagement and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Malokhat Sultanova, Hungary) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Lakshmi A.S, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Integrated Management of Sterility Mosaic Disease (SMD) of Red Gram and Virus – Vector Relationship in the Context of Weather Parameters

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Afroz Alam, Banasthali  Vidyapith, India.

Reviewers:

(1) P.Ravishankar, University of Agricultural Sciences, India.

(2) Prince Kumar Gupta, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Chirag Gautam, Agriculture University, Kota, India.

(2) Jehani Muljibhai Dajabhai, Lovely Professional University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5+8+8+6=30.5/4=7.625

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (P.Ravishankar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Prince Kumar Gupta, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Isolation and Characterization of Canine-specific Lactic Acid Bacteria from Fecal and Oral Samples of Dogs

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  P. Saravana Kumari, Rathnavel Subramaniam College of Arts and Science, Coimbatore, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Garima Verma, Shobhit University, India.

(2) Moudi Aboubacar Mahamadou Rabiou, Ahmadu Bello University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bamigbade Bukky Onyemowos, Federal University of Technology Akure, Nigeria.

(2) Sreejesh P C, St Aloysius (Deemed to be University), India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Garima Verma, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Moudi Aboubacar Mahamadou Rabiou, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2

Peer Review History: Attachment Styles and Preferences for AI: Practical Tool or Emotional Support?

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Omololu Fagbadebo, University of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.

Reviewers:

(1) Juanda, M.Hum, Universitas Negeri Makassar, Indonesia.

(2) Tape Jean Martial, Universite Felix Houphouet Boigny d’Abidjan, Cote D’Ivoire.

(3) Deeksha Dwivedi, USA.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anthony Ogbonna Uche, Federal Polytechnic Offa, Nigeria.

(2) Rekha Dhananjay Chatare, Yeshwantrao Chavan College of Engineering (YCCE), India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Juanda, M.Hum, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Tape Jean Martial, Cote D’Ivoire) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Deeksha Dwivedi, USA) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA