Author Archive: ikpress

Peer Review History: User Perceptions of Environmental Design in Community Clinics: Evidence from Chattogram, Bangladesh

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinayaka K.S, Sri Venkataramana Swamy College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Kaltrina Thaci Cenaj, University of Prishtina, Kosovo.

(2) Ganjar Samudro, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abhishek Karn, Institute of Engineering (IOE), Pulchowk Campus, Tribhuvan University, Nepal.

(2) Chioma Lilian, Federal University of Technology, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kaltrina Thaci Cenaj, Kosovo) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ganjar Samudro, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Introduction of Insect Pollinators Associated with Niger [Guizotia abyssinica (L. f.) Cass.] Crop: A Review

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinayaka K.S, Sri Venkataramana Swamy College,  Karnataka, India  .

Reviewers:

(1) Youssef SALAMA, University Moulay Ismail, Morocco.

(2) Idris Sari, Erzincan Binali Yildirim University, Turkey.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Priyanka Sharma, University of Rajasthan, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Youssef SALAMA, Morocco) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Idris Sari, Turkey) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: An Examination through Cross-culture of Ethnomedical Plants and Their Parts Used in Sindh Forest

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ahmed Fawzy Yousef, Desert Research Center, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) D. Sravani, Aditya college of Engineering and Technology, India.

(2) Shakir Ullah, Institute Of BotanyChinese Academy of Sciences Beijing, China.

(3) Md. Taleb Hossain Roman, International Islamic University Chittagong, Bangladesh.

(4) V. Rama Rao, CCRAS-Central Ayurveda Research Institute, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5+8+8+6=30.5/4=7.625

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (D. Sravani, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shakir Ullah, China) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Md. Taleb Hossain Roman, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 ((V. Rama Rao, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Genetic Mapping: Charting the Course for Superior Crop Varieties

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Hon H. Ho, State University of New York, New Paltz, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Ubaid Ullah Khan, Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, The University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan.

(2)  Haider Ali Kareem, Al-Manara College for Medical Sciences Maysan, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Urvashi Lama, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ubaid Ullah Khan, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Haider Ali Kareem, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Early Years Educators’ ICT Competence, Attitude, Perceived Benefits and Challenges of Integrating Digital Storytelling Package in Instruction in Southwest, Nigeria

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Dr. Abdullah Aydin, Kırşehir Ahi Evran University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Ainomugisha Dickens, Kyambogo University, Uganda.

(2) Pranaykumar Vinodbhai Patel, R.H. Patel English Medium B.Ed. College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ainomugisha Dickens, Uganda) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Pranaykumar Vinodbhai Patel, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Potentials and Challenges of Ecotourism: A Study of Okrika, Oyigbo and Choba Communities in Rivers State

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinayaka K.S, Sri Venkataramana Swamy College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Anshima Srivastava, Bundelkhand University, India.

(2) Olakunle Muyiwa Orimaye, University of Ibadan, Nigeria.

(3) Bright O. Olunusi, Cornell University, Nigeria.

(4) Shashank Kishor Singh, University of Delhi, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Danjum John, Federal Unversity Wukari, Nigeria.

(2) Habib Ullah Nawab, University of Chitral, Pakistan.

(3) Sukanta Sarkar, Gambella University, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Anshima Srivastava, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Olakunle Muyiwa Orimaye, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Bright O. Olunusi, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Shashank Kishor Singh, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Morphological Characterization of Guinea Grass (Megathyrsus maximus) Across a Ploidy Series in Semi-arid Conditions of Central India

Posted on by

Editor(s):
(1) Dr. Tsygankova Victoria Anatolyivna, Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry and Petrochemistry of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine.

Reviewers:
(1) Rudi Hari Murti, Gadjah Mada University, Indonesia.
(2) Muleta Debela Kumsa, Oromia Agricultural Research Institute, Bedele Agricultural Research Center, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Swathi Lekkala, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy:  Click Here

Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rudi Hari Murti, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Muleta Debela Kumsa, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Theoretical and Experimental Analysis of Propellantless Propulsion Using Resonant Cavity Interactions, Quantum Field Effects, and Advanced Optimization

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Palle Jorgensen, University of Iowa, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Jesse Daniel Brown, AASU, USA.

(2) Anuj Kumar, Mahamaya Government Degree College, India.

(3) Kundan C Patil, India.

(4) Hedara Rachida, Algeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jesse Daniel Brown, USA) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Anuj Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Kundan C Patil, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Hedara Rachida, Algeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised MS v1 and Feedback v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Impact of Family Dysfunction on Suicidal Ideation in Students of the Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, URSE

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sanjay Mishra, SR Institute of Management & Technology, Lucknow, U.P, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Bhondwe Meghraj Ramchandra, Dr. Balasaheb Vikhe Patil Rural Medical College, India.

(2) Razaw Noori Hama Faraj, Iraq.

(3) Mehwash Kashif, Karachi Medical and Dental College, Pakistan.

(4) Jolly John OV, Rajagiri College of Social Work (Autonomous), India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Eman Elsheshtawy, Mansoura University, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.37/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Bhondwe Meghraj Ramchandra, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Razaw Noori Hama Faraj, Iraq) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Mehwash Kashif, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Jolly John OV, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised MS v1 and Feedback v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Lecturers and Pre-service Teachers’ Perception on Usefulness of Gamified Learning Strategy for Teaching Science and Vocational Education in Oyo State Colleges of Education

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Tin-Chun Lin, Indiana University Northwest, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Zafar Siddique, The University of Okara, Pakistan.

(2) K.Ramesh, Anurag Engineering College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ika Parma Dewi, Universitas Negeri Padang, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.1/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Zafar Siddique, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (K.Ramesh, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA