Peer Review History: Analysis of Factors Affecting Employee Performance at the Sibolga City Regional Civil Service Agency

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Guanghua Han, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Vasanthi Reena Williams, Vidya Vikas Institute of Engineering and Technology, India.

(2) Muhammad Asif, Air University, Pakistan.

(3) Sunday Abayomi Joseph, Ottawa University, United States.

(4) Agung Suharyanto, Universitas Medan Area, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Vasanthi Reena Williams, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Muhammad Asif, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sunday Abayomi Joseph, United States) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Agung Suharyanto, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Single Puppy Syndrome in a Bitch: A Rare Case Report

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sanjay Mishra, SR Institute of Management & Technology, Lucknow, U.P, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Gitesh Saini, GADVASU, India.

(2) Dorin Togoe, Romania.

(3) Akhil Patel, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ch.Mallikarjunarao, Sri Venkateswara Veterinary University, India.

(2) Muhammad Ali Raza, Pakistan.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9.1/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Gitesh Saini, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Dorin Togoe, Romania) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Akhil Patel, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of the Applications of Agriculturally Important Microorganism in Food, Pharmaceutical and Agricultural Sector

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Anil Kumar, Devi Ahilya University, Khandwa Road, India.

(2) Dr. Chung-Jen Chiang, China Medical University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Mohammed Sallam, Mediclinic Parkview Hospital, United Arab Emirates.

(2) Basim Mohammed Kareem, Al-Qadisiyah University, Iraq.

(3) Deniz Cenikli, University of Pennsylvania, USA.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Rashid Manzoor Lashari, Gomal University, Pakistan.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mohammed Sallam, United Arab Emirates) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Basim Mohammed Kareem, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Deniz Cenikli,  USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation through a Brief Review of Agroforestry Systems: A Case Study in India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Eman Hashem Radwan, Damanhour University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Nguyen Van Hop, Vietnam National University of Forestry-Dongnai Campus, Vietnam.

(2) Prosper Mensah, CSIR-Forestry Research Institute of Ghana, Ghana.

(3) Yashwant Singh Tariyal, VCSG Uttarakhand University of Horticulture and Forestry, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Gana Pati Ojha, Agriculture and Forestry University, Nepal.

(2) Mark Anthony N. Polinar, Mabolo National High School, Philippines.

(3) M.C. Santiago Ruiz Ramírez, México.

(4) Roghan H B, Forest College and Research Institute, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.76/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nguyen Van Hop, Vietnam) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Prosper Mensah, Ghana) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Yashwant Singh Tariyal, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of nano zinc oxide supplementation on egg weight and egg quality parameters in Kuttanad ducks

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinayaka K.S, Sri Venkataramana Swamy College,  Karnataka, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Ishaya Usman Gadzama, Australia.

(2) Anil Kumar Chitithoti, Sri Venkateswara Veterinary University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.09/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ishaya Usman Gadzama, Australia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Anil Kumar Chitithoti, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Balancing Heritage and Habitat: Assessing Tourist Sites, Visitor Impacts and Ecotourism Potential in Gautala Autramghat Wildlife Sanctuary Region, Western India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Eman Hashem Radwan, Damanhour University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Saddam Husain, Pakistan.

(2) Hossein Javanbakht, University of Guilan, Iran.

(3) Tej Kumar Nepal, Australia.

(4) A.A.Arunkumar, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Shivangi Mishra, University of Calgary, Canada.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Saddam Husain, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Hossein Javanbakht, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Tej Kumar Nepal, Australia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (A.A.Arunkumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Good Clinical Practice in Clinical Trials: Global Ethics, Regulation, Implementation and Emerging Directions

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sinan Ince, University of Afyon Kocatepe, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Mohammed Sallam, Arab Emirates.

(2) Boddeda Benarjee Veera Mani Kishore, India.

(3) Mohammad Reza Sanaei, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Barkah Waladani, Universitas Muhammadiyah Gombong, Indonesia.

(2) Hadi Fakih, Lebanese University, Lebanon.

(3) S.Palanivel Rajan, Velammal College of Engineering and Technology, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mohammed Sallam, Arab Emirates) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Boddeda Benarjee Veera Mani Kishore, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Mohammad Reza Sanaei, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: “Effect of different growing media on growth and survivability of aloe vera (Aloe barbadensis)”

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Al-Quds Open University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Sampada Sanjay Deshmane, India.

(2) Anurag M. Bhargav, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sampada Sanjay Deshmane, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Anurag M. Bhargav, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Medical SuperHyperStructure and Healthcare SuperHyperStructure

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Giuseppe Murdaca, University of Genoa, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Shashwat Pandey, India.

(2) Jiangke Wu, China.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Tanvir Amin, Trust University, Bangladesh.

(2) Mesbaul Haque Sazu, Case Western Reserve University, USA          .

(3) Sakila Akter Jahan, Illinois State University, USA.

(4) T Velumni, Rathinam College Of Arts And Science, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.1/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shashwat Pandey, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jiangke Wu, China) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Digital Marketing Return on Investment (ROI) and Financial Performance in Nigeria SMEs

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Alfredo Jimenez Palmero, Kedge Business School, France.

Reviewers:

(1) Nkoli Augustina Chendo, Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu University, Nigeria.

(2) Yuli Purbaningsih, Universitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Azeez Kunle Akinbode, Bowling Green State University, United States of America.

(2) Chandrasekhar Pandugula, USA.

(3) Omolola Temitope Kufile, USA.

(4) Semiu Temidayo Fasasi, United State of America.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nkoli Augustina Chendo, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Yuli Purbaningsih, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA