Peer Review History: Comparative Analysis of Fresh and Stored Guava Ready to Serve Beverage

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. A. Elango, Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Salem, Tamil Nadu, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Suteera Vatthanakul, Thammasat University, Thailand.

(2) Muhammad Amir, Bahauddin Zakariya University Multan, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Suteera Vatthanakul, Thailand) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Muhammad Amir, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Black Soldier Fly Larvae Oil as a Replacement for Fish Oil on the Growth of White Snapper (Lates calcarifer)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sanjay Mishra, SR Institute of Management & Technology, Lucknow, U.P, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Hesham Abozaid, National Reaserch Centre, Egypt.

(2) Mark Eka Ali, Nigeria.

(3) Sana Yagoub Abdallah Tahir, Alneelain University, Sudan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hesham Abozaid, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mark Eka Ali, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sana Yagoub Abdallah Tahir, Sudan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Distribution and Characterization of Microalgae from Chenab and Ravi River, Punjab Pakistan

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinayaka K.S, Sri Venkataramana Swamy College,  Karnataka, India.

Reviewers:

(1)  Morufat Li-Hammed, University of Lagos, Nigeria.

(2) Mahesh Ramchandra Tandale, Sant GAdge Baba Amravati University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1)  Kalyani Teku, Raghu Engineering College (A), India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Morufat Li-Hammed, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mahesh Ramchandra Tandale, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Hankel Determinant of Second Kind for a New Subclass of Analytic Functions Involving Chebyshev Polynomials

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Qiankun Song, Chongqing Jiaotong University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Ganesh Koride, Jyothishmathi Institute Of Technology And Science (Autonomous ), India.

(2) Neha Verma, Delhi Technological University, India.

(3) Mehrzad Ghorbani, Qom University of Technology (QUT), Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bassim Kareem Mihsin, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ganesh Koride, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Neha Verma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Mehrzad Ghorbani, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Role of Social Cooperation in the Evolution of Recursive Language Structures

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Dr. Abdullah Aydin, Kırşehir Ahi Evran University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Mohit Saini, Compucom Institute of Technology and Management, India.

(2) Nazreen Shaik-Peremanov, University of Fort Hare (former University of Cambridge Wolfsons College Scholar), South Africa.

(3) Abhirup Bhadra, Arka Jain University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Getachew Endale Reta, Woldia University, Ethiopia.

(2) Seema Parihar, CT University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mohit Saini, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nazreen Shaik-Peremanov, Africa) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Abhirup Bhadra, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparative Assessment of Faecal Bacterial Contamination of Vegetables from the Central and Fresh Food Markets in Foumbot, West-Cameroon

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ravi Kant Chaturvedi, Chinese Academy of Sciences,P.R. China.

Reviewers:

(1) Abiyt Tenna Wondimu, Ethiopia.

(2) Ch. Lalitha, Dr. V. S. Krishna Govt. Degree and P.G College, India.

(3) Shilpa Mahapatra, SCB Dental College And Hospital, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Azam Shakeel, Aims International university College of Pharmacy Arifwala Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Abiyt Tenna Wondimu, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ch. Lalitha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Shilpa Mahapatra, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Unlocking the Potential of Nanopore Sequencing: Principles, Advances, and Challenges

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Yi-Ren Hong, Kaohsiung Medical University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Somsole Bharath, ICAR – Indian Agricultural Research Institute, India.

(2) Amanulla Khan, Degree College of Science, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Nalluri MallikarjunaRao, Indian Biomedical Innovation Centre, India.

(2) Saurabh Samdarshi, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Somsole Bharath, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Amanulla Khan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of the Effect of Scoparia dulcis (Sweet Broom Weed) on Blood Glucose Levels of Alloxan–Induced Diabetic Albino Rats

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. David E. Martin, TrippBio, Inc., USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Haruna Abubakar Danyaya, Hussaini Adamu Federal Polytechnic Kazaure, Nigeria.

(2) Salah M.M.AL-Chalabi, Biotechnology Research Center, AL-Nhrain University, Iraq.

(3) Annepaka Eliya Raju, Mamata Medical College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Jyotsna Pandit Khedkar, NES’s Gangamai College of Pharmacy, India.

(2) Owo Gogo James, Federal University, Nigeria.

(3) Saroj Yadav, Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research Center, Bhagwant University, India.

(4) T.Delphina, United College of Pharmacy, India.

(5) Vikas Bhausaheb Gawali, Msbte and Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar Technological University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.87/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Haruna Abubakar Danyaya, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Salah M.M.AL-Chalabi, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Annepaka Eliya Raju, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v3_and_Feedback_v3 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v3 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Review on Foxtail Millet Milk: Functional and Nutritional Aspects

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohd Saidin Misnan, Universiti Teknologi, Malaysia.

Reviewers:

(1) Kale Bala Nirmala, Professor Jayashankar Telangana Agricultural Uinversity, India.

(2) Yogita Rahul Mirajkar, College of Non Conventional Vocational Courses for Women, Kolhapur, India.

(3) Orekoya Elias Similoluwa, Augustine University Ilara-Epe, Nigeria.

(4) Hema Deupa, Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Saptarshi Mukherjee, Sikkim Skill University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kale Bala Nirmala, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Yogita Rahul Mirajkar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Orekoya Elias Similoluwa, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Hema Deupa, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Bridging the Rural-Urban Divide: A Systematic Review of Social Media’s Role in Connecting Farmers to Urban Markets

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ioannis A. Makedos, University of Macedonia, Thessaloniki, Greece.

Reviewers:

(1) Firozkhan Pathan, Visvesvarya Technological University, India.

(2) Sourabh Kumar, VKS College of Agriculture, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Firozkhan Pathan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sourabh Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA