Peer Review History: Phytochemical Composition, Antioxidant activity and Microbial Quality of Chinchin Produced from Flour Blends of Wheat, Defatted Peanut and Orange Peel

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ghulam Khaliq, Lasbela University of Agriculture, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Tadlo Yitayew Atlog, Bahir Dar University, Ethiopia.

(2) Devanand Gojiya, Junagadh Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ajita Tiwari, Assam University, India.

(2) Awadhesh Kumar Yadav, Institute of Agriculture and Natural Sciences, Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Gorakhpur University, India.

(3) J. M. Koli, DBSKKV, India.

(4) Keshamma E, Maharani Cluster University, Palace Road, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.

(5) Nikhil Digambar Solanke, Govt. College of Food Technology, Yavatmal. (Dr.PDKV, Akola), India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5+8+8+6=30.5/4=7.625

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Tadlo Yitayew Atlog, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Devanand Gojiya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Cinnamon: A Review on the Medicinal Plant and Its Health Benefits

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ahmed Fawzy Yousef, Desert Research Center, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Deepak Kumar, India.

(2) S Nivetha, M. S University, India.

(3) R.Mala, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Sapna Sangode, India.

(2) Shiva Kant Thakur, Lord Buddha Koshi Pharmacy College, India.

(3) Yasser J. Habeeb, University of Kufa, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Deepak Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (S Nivetha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (R.Mala, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of Roselle (H. sabdariffa L.) Germplasm from Africa and Maintained at Wondogenet, Ethiopia Using a Simple Sequence Repeat (SSR) Marker

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rusu Teodor, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Bapi Ray Sarkar, India.

(2) Olabisi Omowumi Adebisi , USA.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Krou Nitale M’Balikine, University of Kara, Togo.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Bapi Ray Sarkar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Olabisi Omowumi Adebisi , USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Isolation and characterization of bacterial endophytes present in the plant parts of mulberry (Morus indica L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sérgio Thode Filho, Federal Institute of Education, Science, and Technology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Thiyagarajan Santhanamari, Northern Border University, Saudi Arabia.

(2) Ramalingappa, Davangere University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Farkad Hawas Musa, University Of Anbar, Iraq.

(2) Aditi Munmun Sengupta, University of Calcutta, Harvard University, India.

(3) Arif Sakil, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Bangladesh.

(4) Ayesha Shaikh, Dr. Babasaheb Marathwada University, India.

(5) Dhananjay Pandey, Govt. Naveen Girls College, Surajpur, India.

(6) Samiran Patra, Murshidabad KVK West Bengal University of Animal and Fishery Sciences, India.

(7) Sanyogita Shahi, Kalinga University, India.

(8) Víctor Manuel de Jesús Canché Ek, México.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Thiyagarajan Santhanamari, Saudi Arabia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ramalingappa, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Screening of Brassica Spp. Genotypes against Sclerotinia Stem Rot under Natural Epiphytotic Conditions

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Anil Kumar, , Devi Ahilya University, Khandwa Road, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Shital Sanjay Dhawan, Dr Sharadchandra Pawar College of Agriculture, India.

(2) Mihai- Iacob Bențea, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine from Cluj-Napoca (USAMVCN), Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ameer Musa Imran Alhseeni, Iraq.

(2) C. Sankar Ram, Anna University, India.

(3) Markus Christof Labuschagne, University of Pretoria, South Africa.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shital Sanjay Dhawan, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mihai- Iacob Bențea, Romania) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Quality of Life and Sleep Patterns: Analyzing Their Relation in National Athletes

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Tin-Chun Lin, Indiana University Northwest, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Syihaabul Hudaa, Ahmad Dahlan University of Technology, Indonesia.

(2) Fabrice Uwayo, Rwanda.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Margaret Chan Kit Yok, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Syihaabul Hudaa, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Fabrice Uwayo, Rwanda) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Leveraging Indigenous Totemic Traditions with Modern Strategies for Enhancing Wildlife Conservation in the Buganda Kingdom, Uganda

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Afroz Alam, Banasthali  Vidyapith, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Sachin Kumar, India.

(2) Maxwell Jnr Opoku, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Ghana.

(3) Chandrakant Rao, India.

(4) Kamal Kishore, Dr Yashwant Singh Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sachin Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Maxwell Jnr Opoku, Ghana) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Chandrakant Rao, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Kamal Kishore, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Different Methods of Olive Micropropagation

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Hon H. Ho, State University of New York, New Paltz,  USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Diwakar Aggarwal, India.

(2) Zahidur Rahman, Bangladesh.

(3) Taufiqur Rahman Sarkar, University of Rajshahi, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Jahirhussain G, Government Arts College Autonomus, KARUR, Bharathidasan University, India.

(2) Maymoona Ahmed Eisa Eldow, University of Kordofan, Norway.

(3) Shobha Ramasamy, Karpagam Academy of Higher Education ( Deemed-to-be University), India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.2/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Diwakar Aggarwal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Zahidur Rahman, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Taufiqur Rahman Sarkar, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Study on the Chinese-English Translation of Li Peifu’s The Book of Life from the Perspective of Prototype

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Abdullah Aydin, Kırşehir Ahi Evran University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Sushant Kumar Dubey, Amity University, India.

(2) Sekou Sissoko, Universite Des Lettres et des Sciences Humaines de Bamako, Mali.

(3) Ima Frafika Sari, Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Kiai Ageng Muhammad Besari Ponorogo, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Afsheen Hassan, Virtual University of Pakistan, Pakistan.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sushant Kumar Dubey, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sekou Sissoko, Mali) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ima Frafika Sari, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Moisture deficit stress on morphology, physiology and yield responses of mulberry (Morus alba. L)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinayaka K.S, Sri Venkataramana Swamy College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) B Santhosh, Acharya NG Ranga Agricultural University (ANGRAU), India.

(2) Halil Turgut Sahin, Isparta University of Applied Sciences, Turkiye.

(3) N’DA Hugues Annicet, National Center for Agricultural Research, Côte d’Ivoire.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (B Santhosh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Halil Turgut Sahin, Turkiye) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (N’DA Hugues Annicet, Côte d’Ivoire) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA