Peer Review History: Algal Consortia as Green Alternatives: Enhancing Soil Health and Tomato Cultivation

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sanjay Mishra, SR Institute of Management & Technology, Lucknow, U.P, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Sandeep Bhardwaj, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, India.

(2) Golaleh Mostafavi, Azad University, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sandeep Bhardwaj, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Golaleh Mostafavi, Iran) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Navigating General Exceptions in Digital Trade: A Legal Case Analysis of China’s Data Sovereignty Strategy under the CPTPP and DEPA Frameworks

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Marco Muscettola, University of Bari, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Kenneth Besigomwe, Uganda Management Institute, Uganda.

(2) Osarense Dorothy Iguodala, United States of America.

(3) Abhishek Dodda, USA.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Aarif Mohd Waza, SRTM university, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kenneth Besigomwe, Uganda) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Osarense Dorothy Iguodala, United States of America) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Abhishek Dodda, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Plant Breeding, Cultivation, and Grain Breeding techniques of Oats to improve the Nutritional Components

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Seema Akbar, University of Kashmir, Kashmir, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Sakka Samudin, Tadulako University, Indonesia.

(2) Satvinder Singh, G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Kumari Rekha, Mandan Bharti Agriculture College, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

(2) Kundansing R. Jadhao, MGM college of Agricultural Biotechnology, India.

(3) Pawan Kumar Sharma, Chaudhary Sarwan Kumar Himachal Pradesh Agriculture University, India.

(4) Prachitara Rout, ICAR-Central Rice Research Institute, India.

(5) SADJI-AIT KACI Hamida, Université des Sciences et de la technologie Houari Boumediene, Algeria.

(6) Salisu Audu Baba, College Of Education, Zing, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sakka Samudin, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Satvinder Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Adsorptive removal of Zn(II) and crystal violet into phosphoric acid activated corncob

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ahmed Mohammed Abu-Dief Mohammed, Sohag University, Egypt and Taibah University, Saudi Arabia.

Reviewers:

(1) Monsuru Olatunji Dauda, Louisiana State University, USA.

(2) Khairunissa Syairah Binti Ahmad Sohaimi, Universiti Malaysia Perlis, Malaysia.

(3) Anatolii Semenov, Poltava State Agrarian University, Ukraine.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Aref Shokri, Payamenoor University, Iran.

(2) S.Meenachi, Al-Ameen Engineering College, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.1/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Monsuru Olatunji Dauda, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Khairunissa Syairah Binti Ahmad Sohaimi, Malaysia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Anatolii Semenov, Ukraine) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of Acute Toxicity of Scopolamine in Daphnia magna: An In silico and In vivo Approach

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sanjay Mishra, SR Institute of Management & Technology, Lucknow, U.P, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Fernando Condal Domingo, Spain.

(2) Ojo Foluso Olamide, University Of Ilesa, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Gildete de Souza Bezerra, Federal Institute of Espírito Santo – Piúma Campus, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Fernando Condal Domingo, Spain) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ojo Foluso Olamide, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Recent Advances and Strategies for the Valorization of Pineapple Waste in Sustainable Bioeconomy Applications

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rusu Teodor, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Ashif Mohammad, Bangladesh.

(2) Sumit Sudhir Pathak, Karunya Institute of Technology and Sciences, Coimbatore, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Arshi Siddiqui, G. B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ashif Mohammad, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sumit Sudhir Pathak, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Advances in Haploid and Doubled Haploid Technology for Accelerating Breeding Cycles in Crop Improvement

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Prachitara Rout, ICAR-Central Rice Research Institute, India.

(2) Gayatri Sinha, ICAR-Central Rice Research Institute, India.

(3) Mahfut, Lampung University, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ahmed El-Sayed Ismail, National Research Center, Egypt.

(2) Kumari Rekhas, Mandan Bharti Agriculture College, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

(3) Preetam Kumar Senapati, Sambalpur University, India.

(4) Saurabh Samdarshi, India.

(5) Shraddha Karcho, JNKVV, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Prachitara Rout, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Gayatri Sinha, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Mahfut, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Finding Women in Indian Democracy: Exploring the Institutional Structure and Substantive Political Participation

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Tin-Chun Lin, Indiana University Northwest, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Champa Bosu, Chouddagram Government College, Bangladesh.

(2) Nisheet Kumar, Dr. Bhimrao Ambedkar University, India.

(3) Jyoti Singh, Galgotias University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Champa Bosu, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nisheet Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Jyoti Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impact of Agricultural Practices on the Water Quality of Rwakaiha Wetland, Kyegegwa District, Uganda

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Afroz Alam, Banasthali  Vidyapith, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Rami Kaba, Fanshawe College, Canada.

(2) Snehal Balasaheb Punde, The Institute of Science, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mustafa A. Al Yousif, University of Babylon, Iraq.

(2) Omar Taha Mohmood, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rami Kaba, Canada) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Snehal Balasaheb Punde, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of the acceptability of a local African doughnut-type pastry (mikaté) prepared from a mixture of wheat flour and dessert banana powder

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Anil Kumar, Sido-Khanu Murmu University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Borozan Aurica, University of Life Sciences “King Mihai I”, Romania.

(2) Lina Sameer  Mohammed, University of Basrah, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Borozan Aurica, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Lina Sameer  Mohammed, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA