Category Archives: Review History

Peer Review History: Development and Validation of Stability Indicating Method for Simultaneous Determination of Ibuprofen and Famotidine Degradation Products in Tablets by Using RP-UPLC

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Chan-Min Liu, Jiangsu Normal University, P.R. China.

Reviewers:

(1) Ankita Mukund Rayate, Savitribai Phule Pune University, India.

(2) Nilay Akkus Tas, Amasya University, Turkey.

(3) Rajashri.V.Patil, KBC NMU Jalgaon, India.

(4) Muhammad Ashfaq, University of Sargodha, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Manoj R. Gaware, savitribai phule pune university, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ankita Mukund Rayate, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nilay Akkus Tas, Turkey) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Rajashri. V. Patil, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Muhammad Ashfaq, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: The Maturity Levels of the Digital Technology Competence in the Libyan Telecommunications Sector

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Qiankun Song, Chongqing Jiaotong University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Jawad K. Ali, Iraq.

(2) V Karamchand Gandhi, India.

(3) Dip Bharatbhai Patel, USA.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Khanyisani Xulu, University of South Africa, South Africa.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jawad K. Ali, Iraq) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (V Karamchand Gandhi, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Dip Bharatbhai Patel, USA) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Investigating the Role of Household Water Storage Practices in Shaping Microbial Contamination and Diarrheal Disease Burden in South East Nigeria

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Anil Kumar, Devi Ahilya University, Khandwa Road, India.

(2) Dr. Chung-Jen Chiang, China Medical University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Padavala Kranthi Kumar, India.

(2) Traore Moumouny, Peleforo Gon Coulibaly University, Côte d’Ivoire.

(3) Suneeta Panicker, Savitribai Phule Pue University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Naser korde zedin, University of Technology, Iraq.

(2) Sudhir Sharadrao Hunge, Chintamani College Of Science, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Padavala Kranthi Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Traore Moumouny, Côte d’Ivoire) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Suneeta Panicker, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Evaluating the Impact of Water Quality on Zooplankton Assemblages of Mbo and Eastern Obolo Estuary, South-Eastern, Nigeria

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinayaka K.S, Sri Venkataramana Swamy College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Johan Bin Ismail, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia.

(2) Huynh Truong Giang, Can Tho University, Vietnam.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Johan Bin Ismail, Malaysia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Huynh Truong Giang, Vietnam) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Evaluation of Serum Clusterin and Uric Acid Levels in HIV Infected Patients with and without Malaria Infection in Nauth, Nnewi, Nigeria

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Prof.  Ashish Anand, William Carey School of Osteopathic Medicine and University of Mississipi Medical Center, Mississipi, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Elochukwu Ebunoluwa Ukatu, Nigeria.

(2) Pragati Khare, India.

(3) Huemer O. Uy, Philippihes.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Komal Bhati, SPS, SDGI Global University, India.

(2) Ramzy Muorwel Matueny, Mount Kenya University, Kenya.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Elochukwu Ebunoluwa Ukatu, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Pragati Khare, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Huemer O. Uy, Philippihes) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Production of Bioethanol from Tropical Fruit Waste (Pineapple, Banana, and Papaya) through Alcoholic Fermentation

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinayaka K.S, Sri Venkataramana Swamy College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Nnachor Amarachi Clare, United State of America.

(2) Chinwe Justice-Alucho, United States.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bolorunduro Daniel David, Auburn University, United States of America.

(2) Daniel Chinedu Nweze, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Nigeria.

(3) Danial Moshtaghi Shafti , Universiti Sains Malaysia, Malaysia.

(4) Mohsin Ahemad Mustak Ahemad Sheikh, India.

(5) Yidnekachew  Kifle Aweke, Wollo University, Ethiopia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nnachor Amarachi Clare, United State of America) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Chinwe Justice-Alucho, United States) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Strengthening public health responses to infectious diseases in low- and middle-income countries through vaccine accessibility, antibiotic stewardship, and community engagement

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Giuseppe Murdaca, University of Genoa, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Oromidayo Ogunlade, Texila America University, Guyana.

(2) Anthony Kwaw, Tamale Teaching Hospital, Ghana.

(3) Ndudim, Oluchi Mildred, University of Port Harcourt, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Amir Soliman, Delta University For Science And Technology, Egypt.

(2) Shomik Ray, Indian Institute of Public Health- Delhi and PHFI, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Oromidayo Ogunlade, Guyana) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Anthony Kwaw, Ghana) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ndudim, Oluchi Mildred, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Antimicrobial Susceptibility Pattern of Bacteria Isolated from Prosthetic Device Used by Patients at National Orthopedic Hospital Enugu

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Chan-Min Liu, Jiangsu Normal University, P.R. China.

Reviewers:

(1) Krishnee Moodley, South Africa.

(2) Manu Mitra, USA.

(3) Pritha Sarkar, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Asmaa M. Salih Almohaidi, Baghdad University, Iraq.

(2) Hiba Sabah Jasim, University of Baghdad, Iraq.

(3) Pritha Sarkar, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Krishnee Moodley, South Africa) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Manu Mitra, USA) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Pritha Sarkar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Comprehensive review of Genotoxic Impurities: Current Trend, Challenges and Control strategies for Pharmaceutical Drug Products

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sinan Ince, University of Afyon Kocatepe, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Swati Goyal, Dr. APJ Abdul Kalam University, India.

(2) Kamal Fared Almokhalelati, Syria.

(3) Pushpanjali Singh, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Amit Kumar, MIT College of Pharmacy, India.

(2) Balaji Nagarajan, United States of America.

(3) Mohammed Hassan,  Bayero University, Nigeria.

(4) Sarita Khaturia, Mody University of Science and Technology, India.

(5) Vaishali Bhardwaj, Rajshree College of Pharmacy, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.43/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Swati Goyal, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kamal Fared Almokhalelati, Syria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Pushpanjali Singh, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Workload and Work-Life Balance Influences Job Satisfaction through Turnover Intention in Employment Companies

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Alfredo Jimenez Palmero, Kedge Business School, France.

Reviewers:

(1) Minika Bawa, Guru Nanak Khalsa College for Women, India.

(2) Prasadja Ricardianto, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mutiiah Mohamad, Universiti Teknologi Mara (Perlis Branch), Malaysia.

(2 )Rajlaxmi Mohanty, Teaching cum Research Assistant at Management Development Institute – Gurgaon, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Minika Bawa, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Prasadja Ricardianto, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Re-Review report_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Re-Review report_2_v1 (Decline) | NA | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA