Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rafik Karaman, Al-Quds University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Jhakeshwar Prasad, Shri Shankaracharya College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, India.

(2) Rahmawati, Public Health (Epidemiologi), Mandala Waluya University, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jhakeshwar Prasad, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rahmawati, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Fabricio Moraes de Almeida, Federal University of Rondonia, Campus de Porto Velho, Brasil.

Reviewers:

(1) Manisha Prashant Pawar, DKTE Society’s Textile and Engineering Institute, India.

(2) Sutrisno, Universitas PGRI Semarang, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Manisha Prashant Pawar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sutrisno, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Eman Hashem Radwan, Damanhour University, Egypt.

(2) Dr. Pedro Antonio Hernandez Cruz, Autonomous University “Benito Juarez” of Oaxaca. México.

Reviewers:

(1) Ashokan Kannarath, Shivaji University, India.

(2) Rashmi H. Mishal, GES’s Sir Dr. M. S. Gosavi College of Pharmaceutical Education & Research, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9.1/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ashokan Kannarath, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rashmi H. Mishal, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Qiankun Song, Chongqing Jiaotong University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Prabhakara S., IGNOU, India.

(2) Nkpordee Lekia, Kampala International University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Prabhakara S., India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nkpordee Lekia, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Qiankun Song, Chongqing Jiaotong University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Somdeb Lahiri, India.

(2) Shubham Agarwal, New Delhi Institute of Management, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Somdeb Lahiri, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shubham Agarwal, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Hon H. Ho, State University of New York, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Amrutlal Ratilal Khaire, Mahatma Phule Agril. University,  Govt. College of Agriculture, India.

(2) P. Ranchana, Karunya Institute of Technology and Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 1.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Amrutlal Ratilal Khaire, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (P. Ranchana, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Qiankun Song, Chongqing Jiaotong University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Susha D, Catholicate College, India.

(2) Sanjib Kumar Datta, University of Kalyani, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Susha D, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sanjib Kumar Datta, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Guanghua Han, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Wilson Bangun, Maranatha Christian University, Indonesia.

(2) Nivedita Mishra Thapliyal, Himalayayi University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Wilson Bangun, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nivedita Mishra Thapliyal, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. A. Elango, Veterinary College and Research Institute, Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Yasaman Khazaei, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

(2) Kolavali Yalla Reddy, Annamacharya College of Pharmacy, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Yasaman Khazaei, Iran) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kolavali Yalla Reddy, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Pedro Antonio Hernandez Cruz, Proteomic and Glycobiology of cancer Laboratory, Autonomous University “Benito Juarez” of Oaxaca. México.

Reviewers:

(1) Aditi Chaudhary, CHRIST University, India.

(2) Givanildo de Gois, Federal University of Acre, Campus Cruzeiro do Sul, Brazil.

(3) Masoud Seidgar, Iranian Fisheries Science Research Institute, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Aditi Chaudhary, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Givanildo de Gois, Brazil) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Masoud Seidgar, Iran) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA