Peer Review History: The Digital Panopticon: How Learning Management Systems Transform Educational Surveillance and Student Agency

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Abdullah Aydin, Kırşehir Ahi Evran University, Turkey.

(2) Dr. Stan Weeber, McNeese State University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Ibrahim Alhassan Libata, Abdullahi Fodio University of Science and Technology, Nigeria.

(2) Quezco Francisco Velasquez, Philippines.

(3) S. Latha Venkateswari, Government College of Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) C. Ashok Kumar, Sakthi Institute of Teacher Education and Research, India.

(2) Debdas Mondal, S.R. Fatepuria College, India.

(3) Hom Raj Khadka, Nepal.

(4) Muhamad Arpan, Universitas PGRI Pontianak, Indonesia.

(5) Raghu Echempati, Kettering University, USA.

(6) Teotino Gomes Soares, Universidade Oriental Timor Lorosae (UNITAL), Timor-Leste.

(7) Vani.R, Sri Devaraj  Urs Academy of higher education and research centre, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ibrahim Alhassan Libata, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Quezco Francisco Velasquez, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (S. Latha Venkateswari, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised MS v2 and Feedback v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Influence of Planting Geometry on Growth Dynamics of Ashok (Saraca asoca)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Eman Hashem Radwan, Damanhour University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) P. C. Prabu, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

(2) Hanaa Mohamed Sakara, Soil, Water and Environmental Research Institute – Agricultural Research Centre, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Muhammad Haider Ali, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Pakistan.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.55/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (P. C. Prabu, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Hanaa Mohamed Sakara, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Development and Sensory Assessment of Herbal-Mixture-based Foods- Uttapam and Upma for Type 2 Diabetes Control

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Wagih Mommtaz Ghnnam, Mansoura University Hospital, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Priya A, Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, India.

(2) Paras Pradeep Chavan, University of Mumbai, India.

(3) Sanjay S. Nagargoje, Savitribai Phule Pune University, India.

(4) Gazala Afrin, Eras Lucknow Medical College and Hospital, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ashmita Debnath, ICAR-IVRI, India.

(2) Peter Micheal Besada, Alexandria University, Egypt.

(3) Siddhesh Nandaram Matele, Mumbai University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Priya A, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Paras Pradeep Chavan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sanjay S. Nagargoje, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Gazala Afrin, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Panchagavya on Physical and Nutritive Value of Hydroponic Fodder Maize

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinayaka K.S, Sri Venkataramana Swamy College, Karnataka, India.

Reviewers:

(1) E. Thippeswamy, Mangalore University, India.

(2) Marwan Reddy Chinnam, Vivekananda Global University, India.

(3) Shubhashri Kumari, OP Jindal University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (E. Thippeswamy, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Marwan Reddy Chinnam, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Shubhashri Kumari, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Dosage Optimization of Methionine and Moringa oleifera Leaf Extract for In ovo Feeding in Japanese Quails

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinayaka K.S,Sri Venkataramana Swamy College, Karnataka, India.

Reviewers:

(1) A.K. Srivastava, India.

(2) Sadiq Haladu, Federal Polytechnic Ede, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Shahbaa Muslem Ismail, Middle Technical University, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (A.K. Srivastava, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sadiq Haladu, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Structure of Labour Market in Coir Spinning and its Implications for Workers’ Welfare: Evidence from Kerala

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. John M. Polimeni, Albany College of Pharmacy & Health Sciences, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Abhiraj Malia, Kalinga Institute of Social Sciences, Deemed to be University, India.

(2) B.R.Kumar, Andhra Loyola College, India.

(3) Vasudha Kurikala, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Jagadish Tulimelli, Vignan Deemed to be University, India.

(2) Rukmini M, Maharajah’s College (Autonomous), India.

(3) Sphurti Birajdar, Dnyaan Prasad Global University’s School of Maangement & Research, India.

(4) Zhao Changyi, Tomsk State University, Russian Federation.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Abhiraj Malia, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (B.R.Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Vasudha Kurikala, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of Indoor and Outdoor Particulate Matter Concentrations in Air at Some Secondary Schools in Port Harcourt Local Government Area Rivers State, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Pradip K. Bhowmik, University of Nevada Las Vegas, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Itohan Iyobhebhe, Mountain Top University, Nigeria.

(2) Yasir Khaleel Almusawi, Al-Nahrain University , Iraq.

(3) T Bhanu Teja, Guru Nanak University , India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.93/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Itohan Iyobhebhe, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Yasir Khaleel Almusawi, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (T Bhanu Teja, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: An Integrated Analysis of Physiological Alterations in Moth Bean in Response to Pre and Post Emergence Herbicides

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sanjay Mishra, SR Institute of Management & Technology, Lucknow, U.P, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Muzamil Yousuf, India.

(2) Niharika Bharti, B. R. Ambedkar Bihar University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Muzamil Yousuf, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Niharika Bharti, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of Genetic Diversity and Farmers Associated Indigenous Knowledge of Enset (Ensete ventricosum (Welw.) Cheesman) Landraces in the Keffa Zone, Ethiopia

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinayaka K.S, Sri Venkataramana Swamy College, Karnataka, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Derviş ÖZTÜRK, Turkey.

(2) Sami Awad Alkubiasy, University of Anbar, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Derviş ÖZTÜRK, Turkey) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sami Awad Alkubiasy, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Integrative Ethnobotanical and GC–MS Analysis of Valeriana jatamansi Jones: Pharmacological Potential and Conservation Importance

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Hon H. Ho, State University of New York, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Kurniawan Arif Maspul, Al-Madinah International University, Malaysia.

(2) Talip Şahin, Adıyaman University, Türkiye.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) K. Jagadeesh, St. Johns college of Pharmaceutical Sciences, India.

(2) Umesh Kumar, Swami Vivekanand Subharti University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kurniawan Arif Maspul, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Talip Şahin, Türkiye) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA