Editor(s):

(1) Prof.  Ashish Anand, William Carey School of Osteopathic Medicine, and University of Mississipi Medical Center, Mississipi, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Vrushabh Sunil Patil, Dr J.J.Magdum Pharmacy College Jaysingpur, India.

(2) Tasawar Iqbal, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Pakistan.

(3) Suleman Hussain Shah, University of Gujrat, Punjab, Pakistan.

(4) Saubhagya S. Agrawal, Teerthanker Mahaveer Unversity, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Dil Prasad Subba, School of Pharmacy, Sharda University, India.

(2) Mahendra Dwivedi, Maharana Pratap  School of Pharmacy, India.

(3) Prabhakar Kumar, GM. College of Pharmacy, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Vrushabh Sunil Patil, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Tasawar Iqbal, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Suleman Hussain Shah, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Saubhagya S. Agrawal, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sérgio Thode Filho, Multidisciplinary Waste Management Laboratory,Federal Institute of Education, Science, and Technology

Reviewers: 

(1) Emmanuel Onyenweife Ayadinuno, Nnamdi  Azikiwe  University, Nigeria.

(2) Sodiq Alaka, United Kingdom.

(3) Kawa A. Ahmed, University of Zakho, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9.1/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Emmanuel Onyenweife Ayadinuno, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sodiq Alaka, United Kingdom) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Kawa A. Ahmed, Iraq) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rafik Karaman, Al-Quds University, Jerusalem, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) A Arboix, University of Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.

(2) Emmanuel Garba Sunday, Benue State University Teaching Hospital, Nigeria.

(3) Shruti Jaiswal, PESU Institute of Medical Sciences & Research, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ana Dias Amaral, Instituto Português de Oncologia do Porto, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto, Portugal.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (A Arboix, Spain) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Emmanuel Garba Sunday, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Shruti Jaiswal, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Sofia Pedrosa Gomes dos Santos, Human Kinetics Faculty, University of Lisbon, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Tikendra Kumar Sahu, Apeejay Stya University, India.

(2) H. Asia Thabassoom, Jamal Mohamed College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Tikendra Kumar Sahu, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (H. Asia Thabassoom, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Al-Quds Open University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) P. Lepakshi, Dr. YSR Horticultural University, India.

(2) Novin Chmaling, GB Pant National Institute of Himalayan Environment, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (P. Lepakshi, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Novin Chmaling, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Eman Hashem Radwan, Damanhour University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Satish Bhagwatrao Aher, ICMR-National Institute for Research in Environmental Health, India.

(2) Waqas Iqbal, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Tsegaye Fekadu Egza, Arba Minch University, Ethiopia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.2/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Satish Bhagwatrao Aher, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Waqas Iqbal, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sinan Ince,  University of Afyon Kocatepe, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Mukesh Kumar Shukla, Hygia Institute of Pharmacy, India.

(2) Arushi Gupta, Shobhit University, India.

(3) Suhena Sarkar, Medical College Kolkata, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mukesh Kumar Shukla, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Arushi Gupta, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Suhena Sarkar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ahmed Mohammed Abu-Dief Mohammed, Sohag University, Egypt and Taibah University, Saudi Arabia.

Reviewers:

(1) Rahul G. Deshmukh, Dr. D. Y. Patil Institute of Technology, India.

(2) Dhoha ahmad, University of Technology, Baghdad, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abdul Aziz, Pakistan.

(2) Akinrinade Nathaniel Abidemi, Bells University of Technology, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5+8+8+6=30.5/4=7.625

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rahul G. Deshmukh, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Dhoha Ahmad, Iraq) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Pradip K. Bhowmik, University of Nevada Las Vegas, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Chima Eke, Montclair State University, USA.

(2) Mbemba Kiélé Molingo, University of Marien NGOUABI, Republic of Congo.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Chima Eke, USA) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mbemba Kiélé Molingo, Republic of Congo) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Dr. Abdullah Aydin, Kırşehir Ahi Evran University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Irena Nikaj, University Fan Noli Korça, Albania.

(2) Elymar A. Pascual, Philippines.

(3) Amador Cernuda-Lago, King Juan Carlos Uniiversity, Spain.

(4) Muhammad Arshad, National College of Business Administration and Economics, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Irena Nikaj, Albania) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Elymar A. Pascual, Philippines) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Amador Cernuda-Lago, Spain) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Muhammad Arshad, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA