Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ravi Kant Chaturvedi, Chinese Academy of Sciences, P.R. China.

Reviewers:

(1) Erhan Unlu, University of Dicle, Turkey.

(2) Basavarajaiah DM, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Erhan Unlu, Turkey) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Basavarajaiah DM, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Palle Jorgensen, University of Iowa, USA.

(2) Dr. Andrey Trubitsyn, Ryazan State Radio Engineering University, Russia.

Reviewers:

(1) Rakesh A. Afre, ZES’s Zeal College of Engineering and Research, India.

(2) Terngu Timothy Uzah, Federal University of Petroleum Resources, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) J.Dhilipan, SRM IST Ramapuram Campus Chennai, India.

(2) Kailash Kumar, Teerthanker Mahaveer University, India.

(3) S.Bagyalakshmi, United Institute of Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rakesh A. Afre, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Terngu Timothy Uzah, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Fawzy Ramadan Hasssanien, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, KSA.

Reviewers:

(1) Amirreza Zarrekarizi, New Zealand.

(2) Nogot Abdelaaziz, University of Moulay Ismail, Morocco.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Amirreza Zarrekarizi, New Zealand) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nogot Abdelaaziz, Morocco) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised MS v1 and Feedback v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Seema Akbar, Regional Research Institute of Unani Medicine (CCRUM), University of Kashmir, Kashmir, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Ravi Ranjan Saxesena, Mandsaur University, India.

(2) Saket Kumar, KPS Degree College Bundelkhnad University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Akanksha Shukla, Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, India.

(2) Sanjaya Gyawali, USA.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.1/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ravi Ranjan Saxesena, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Saket Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised MS v1 and Feedback v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rafik Karaman, Al-Quds University, Jerusalem, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Beatrice Jee Ngee Ling, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia.

(2) Neelima Agarwal, Saraswathi Institute Of Medical Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Beatrice Jee Ngee Ling, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Neelima Agarwal, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised MS v1 and Feedback v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohd Saidin Misnan, Universiti Teknologi, Malaysia.

Reviewers:

(1) Abin Varghese, Srinivas University Mangalore India, India.

(2) Sakila Akter Jahan, Illinois State University, USA.

(3) Shaikh Azam Zahir, PSGVPM’s College of Pharmacy, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Rekha Bhandari Sachdeva, Noida International Institute of Medical Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Abin Varghese, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sakila Akter Jahan, USA) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Shaikh Azam Zahir, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised MS v1 and Feedback v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Fawzy Ramadan Hasssanien, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, KSA.

Reviewers:

(1) Urapam Zimik, Kamakhya Pemton College, India.

(2) Abbas Fadhil Khudhur, Tikrit University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mehak Mahajan, Govt Medical College Udhampur, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Urapam Zimik, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Abbas Fadhil Khudhur, Iraq) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised MS v1 and Feedback v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised MS v2 and Feedback v2 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Anil Kumar, Sido-Khanu Murmu University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Ahmad A. Suliman, National Research Center, Egypt.

(2) Kumari Akanksha, Birla Institute of Technology Mesra, India.

(3) Jyoti Chandola, DBS PG College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Pankaj Kumar, Baba Farid College, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ahmad A. Suliman, Egypt) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kumari Akanksha, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Jyoti Chandola, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised MS v1 and Feedback v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Revised MS v2 and Feedback v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ashish Anand, William Carey School of Osteopathic Medicine and University of Mississippi Medical Center, Mississippi, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Bashir Sani, Sa’adatu Rimi College of Education, Nigeria.

(2) Suela Ndoja, Albania.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Bashir Sani, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Suela Ndoja, Albania) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Hon H. Ho, State University of New York, New Paltz, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Shailesh Kumar, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, India.

(2) Sajoy Shil, BCKV, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shailesh Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sajoy Shil, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised MS v1 and Feedback v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA