Peer Review History: Nocardia corallina (Rhodococcus corallinus) Applicability for Bioremediation of Petroleum Wastes in Soil

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ravi Kant Chaturvedi, Chinese Academy of Sciences, P.R. China.

Reviewers:

(1) Osama Asanousi Eshteiwi Lamma, Bani Waleed University, Libya.

(2) Padmavathi Anduri, CH.S.D.ST.Theresa’s College for women (A), India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anas Mslim Almamoori, Al-Qasim Green University, Iraq.

(2) Eferhire Stephanie Akarator, United Kingdom.

(3) Idham Abed, University of Anbar, Iraq.

(4) Popa Maria, Petroleum-Gas University Of Ploiești, România.

(5) Vyacheslav Kuznetsov, Azerbaijan State University of Oil and Industry, Azerbaijan.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Osama Asanousi Eshteiwi Lamma, Libya) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Padmavathi Anduri, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised MS v1 and Feedback v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Review on Nutritional and Functional Benefits of Replacing Refined Wheat Flour with Millet Flour in Bakery Products

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Golubkina Nadezhda Alexandrovna, Agrochemical research center, Russia.

(2) Dr. Ghulam Khaliq, Lasbela University of Agriculture, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) M.R. Hemamalini, Dwaraka Doss Goverdhan Doss Vaishnav College, India.

(2) Pranay Sadawarti, Kamla Nehru Mahavidyalaya, Nagpur, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Chndrahas Sahu, DAU Shri Vasudev Chandrakar Kamdhenu Vishwavidyalaya, India.

(2) Lovina Inyang, Kent State University, United States.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (M.R. Hemamalini, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Pranay Sadawarti, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised MS v1 and Feedback v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Revised MS v2 and Feedback v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Attitude and Perception of Consumers’ towards Buying Organic Turmeric: A Study in Punjab, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Sanjay Mishra, SR Institute of Management & Technology, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Anup Nainabasti, Nepal.

(2) Tamalika Sikder, Gauhati Commerce College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Anup Nainabasti, Nepal) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Tamalika Sikder, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Special Class of Repeated-Root Constacyclic Codes

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Dariusz Jacek Jakobczak, Technical University of Koszalin, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Jayarama H. R, Sapthagiri NPS University, India.

(2) Preetham N. Raj, Dayananda Sagar College of Engineering, India.

(3) Ameer A.J. Al-Swidi, University of Babylon, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Gibbs K.D.N Kawinga, Zimbabwe.

(2) Pemha Binyam Gabriel Cedric, University of Douala, Cameroon.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jayarama H. R, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Preetham N. Raj, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ameer A.J. Al-Swidi, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised MS v1 and Feedback v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Environmental Benefits of Edible Wafer Cups: Reducing Plastic Waste in Rajshahi City Tea Shops

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Sofia Pedrosa Gomes dos Santos, University of Lisbon, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Nureesun Mahamud, Chulalongkorn University, Thailand.

(2) Manal Abdel Rahman Ali Sorour, Food Technology Research Institute, ARC, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nureesun Mahamud, Thailand) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Manal Abdel Rahman Ali Sorour, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised MS v1 and Feedback v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Herbaceous Species Diversity, Composition and Anthropogenic Disturbances at Gautala Autramghat Wildlife Sanctuary (GAWLS), Maharashtra, Western India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Pedro Antonio Hernandez Cruz, Autonomous University “Benito Juarez” of Oaxaca, México.

Reviewers:

(1) Theophilus Deenadayal, Govt. First Grade College, Adikavi Sri Maharshi Valmiki University, India.

(2) Vikaspal Singh, Dolphin PG Institute of Biomedical & Natural Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mohshin Ali Mondol, Bangladesh Jute Research Institute, Bangladesh.

(2) Pradeepen Rai, ICFRE-Rain Forest Research Institute, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Theophilus Deenadayal, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Vikaspal Singh, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised MS v1 and Feedback v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised MS v2 and Feedback v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Picture Logic Operators and Implications on Fermatean Picture Fuzzy Sets

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sheng Zhang, Bohai University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Mehwish Sarfraz, Riphah International University, Pakistan.

(2) Anum, Manasseh Terna, Joseph Sarwuan Tarka University Makurdi, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Sarbast Moslem, University College Dublin, Ireland.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mehwish Sarfraz, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Anum, Manasseh Terna, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised MS v1 and Feedback v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: AI Models for Wildlife Population Dynamics: Machine Learning vs. Deep Learning

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Shi-Hai Dong, National Polytechnic Institute, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Prashant Kumar, K.S. Saket P.G. College, India.

(2) Frehiwot Gebrekrstos Girmay, Addis Ababa Science and Technology University, Ethiopia.

(3) Priyanka Gandhi, Jagan Institute of Management Studies, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ahmed El-Sayed Saqr, Mansoura University, Egypt.

(2) Milind Cherukuri, University of North Texas, USA.

(3) Mohd Akash Khan, Mahatma Jyotiba Phule Rohilkhan University Bareilly, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Prashant Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Frehiwot Gebrekrstos Girmay, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Priyanka Gandhi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised MS v1 and Feedback v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Experience of Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sinan Ince, University of Afyon Kocatepe, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Nabin Pokharel, Kathmandu University, Nepal.

(2) Selwa Yousif Abdeldafie Mohammed, University of Hafr Albatin, KSA.

(3) Gamal Youssef, UAE.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Esra Fidan Uslu, Necmettin Erbakan University, Turkey.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Nabin Pokharel, Nepal) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Selwa Yousif Abdeldafie Mohammed, KSA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Gamal Youssef, UAE) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised MS v1 and Feedback v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impact of Leadership Behavior on Employee Performance during the Covid-19 Pandemic: A Study of Patobong Village Government, South Sulawesi Province, Indonesia

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Guanghua Han, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Sangjukta Halder, Reena Mehta College of Arts, Science, Commerce and Management Studies, University of Mumbai, India.

(2) D Somasekhar, Gitam University, India.

(3) Kavitha S R, Nitte Deemed to be University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Angkita Borpatra Gohain, Golaghat Commerce College (A), India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Sangjukta Halder, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (D Somasekhar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Kavitha S R, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised MS v1 and Feedback v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA