Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Giuseppe Murdaca, University of Genoa, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Roja Rani Budha, HK College of Pharmacy, India.

(2) Vikrant Nikam, Amrutvahini College of Pharmacy, India.

(3) Khuspe Pankaj Ramdas, Shriram Shikshan Sanstha’s College of Pharmacy,  India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.3

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Roja Rani Budha, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Vikrant Nikam, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Khuspe Pankaj Ramdas, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vincenzo Tufarelli, University of Bari ‘Aldo Moro’, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Amritpal Mehta, Guru Kashi University, India.

(2) Kirpa Ram, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Badari Prasad P.R, College of Agriculture Gangavathi, UAS Raichur, India.

(2) Sheikh Salma Irshad, Punjab Agricultural University, India.

(3) Sonal Vaja, Dr. Subhash University, India.

(4) Suresh Madugula, India.

(5) Tapon Kumar Roy, Bangladesh Rice Research Institute (BRRI), Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Amritpal Mehta, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kirpa Ram, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Eman Hashem Radwan, Assistant Professor, Damanhour University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Soma Garani, WBUAFS, India.

(2) Lemma Gulilat, Debre Tabor University, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Kadhim Jawad Lafta, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Karbala, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Soma Garani, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Lemma Gulilat, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Surendra Singh Bargali, Kumaun University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Rajpriya, Banaras Hindu University, India.

(2) Amilcar Isidro Servín Niz, Universidad Nacional de Concepción, Paraguay.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rajpriya, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Amilcar Isidro Servín Niz, Paraguay) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Pedro Antonio Hernandez Cruz, Autonomous University “Benito Juarez” of Oaxaca. México.

Reviewers:

(1) Rajesh Kumar Sharma, Agriculture University, India.

(2) Pradip Babanrao Kakade, Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rajesh Kumar Sharma, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Pradip Babanrao Kakade, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ioannis A. Makedos, University of Macedonia, Greece.

Reviewers:

(1) B.Devi Priya, PSGR Krishnammal College for Women, India.

(2) Simon T. Sebuliba, University of Eswatini, Eswatini.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (B.Devi Priya, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Simon T. Sebuliba, Eswatini) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. David E. Martin, TrippBio, Inc., USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Fawaz Parapurath, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

(2) Hermawan, Universitas Sains Al-Qur’an, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Fawaz Parapurath, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Hermawan, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Palle E. T. Jorgensen,  The University of Iowa, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Alka Gaur, Jigyasa University, India.

(2) Smrita Jain, Moradabad Institute Of Technology, India.

(3) Snehasis Dey, BPUT University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Alka Gaur, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Smrita Jain, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Snehasis Dey, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Seema Akbar, University of Kashmir, Kashmir, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Hemanshukumar J. Maisuria, Gujarat Biotechnology Research Center, India.

(2) Navnit Kumar, RPCAU, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hemanshukumar J. Maisuria, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Navnit Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Sanjay Mishra, Department of Biotechnology, SR Institute of Management & Technology, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Rama Shankar, Patanjali Research Foundation, India.

(2) Mohini Tawade, Dr. D. Y. Patil College of Pharmacy, India.

(3) Viktoriia Protska, National University of Pharmacy, Ukraine.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abhijeet Nanasaheb Pawar, Sadguru Gadage Maharaj College, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rama Shankar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mohini Tawade, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Viktoriia Protska, Ukraine) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA