Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Giuseppe Murdaca, University of Genoa, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Eduardo I. Faundez, Cape Horn International Center, Chile.

(2) Anil Kumar Sharma, Uttaranchal University, Dehradun, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.65

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Eduardo I. Faundez, Chile) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Anil Kumar Sharma, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Surendra Singh Bargali, Kumaun University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Jeebanjyoti Behera, Odisha University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

(2) Chippy Mohan, Christ University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.65

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jeebanjyoti Behera, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Chippy Mohan, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Hon H. Ho, State University of New York, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Niraj Kumar Prajapati, Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar University, India.

(2) Nguyen Thi Lang, High Agricultural Technology Research Institute, VIET NAM.

(3) Anirneeta De, Swami Vivekananda University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Niraj Kumar Prajapati, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nguyen Thi Lang, VIET NAM) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Anirneeta De, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Department of Economic, School of Business and Economics, Indiana University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Arman Mohammad Nakib, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, China.

(2) D.Kavitha, Nalla Malla Reddy Engineering College,  India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mohammad Siddique, BUITEMS, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Arman Mohammad Nakib, China) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (D.Kavitha, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Abdullah Aydin, Kırşehir Ahi Evran University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Vincenzo De Masi, Beijing Normal University &  Hong Kong Baptist University, China.

(2) Abhinandan Guruprasad Pakhmode, Manoharbhai Patel College of Arts Commerce and Science Deori. Dist- Gondia (M.S), India.

(3) Ahmad Yar Khan, GCMS Thana, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Vincenzo De Masi, China) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Abhinandan Guruprasad Pakhmode, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ahmad Yar Khan, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. John M. Polimeni, Associate Professor, Albany College of Pharmacy & Health Sciences, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Yolamas Jeerasantikul, Mahidol University, Thailand.

(2) Hepzibah Gnana Sinthiya R, Voorhees College, India.

(3) Fahad Javed Baig, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Pakistan.

(4) Pratiksinh S. Vaghela, Sarvajanik University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.37

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Yolamas Jeerasantikul, Thailand) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Hepzibah Gnana Sinthiya R, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Fahad Javed Baig, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Pratiksinh S. Vaghela, , India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Tin-Chun Lin, Indiana University, USA.

(2) Prof. Abdullah Aydin, Kirsehir Ahi Evran University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Balica Braimah, Tamale Technical University, Ghana.

(2) Sophie Hlatywayo, Zimbabwe Open University, Zimbabwe.

(3) Prospery M Mwila, Saint Augustine University of Tanzania, Tanzania.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Samson Basome, Lecturer Kampala University, Uganda.

(2) Awoniyi Babatunde Augustine, University of Lagos, Nigeria.

(3) Samson Basome, Lecturer Kampala University, Uganda.

(4) Shuaibu Idris Gupa, FCT College of Education Zuba, Nigeria.

(5) Ssimbwa Peter, Abaarso Tech University-Hargeisa, Uganda.

(6) Abdullahi Isah Aliyu, Aliko Dangote University of Science & Technology, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.84

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Balica Braimah, Ghana) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sophie Hlatywayo, Zimbabwe) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Prospery M Mwila, Tanzania) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v3_and_Feedback_v3 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ravi Kant Chaturvedi, Chinese Academy of Sciences,P.R. China.

Reviewers:

(1) Attri Meenakshi, SKUAST-Jammu, India.

(2) Marwan Noori Ramadhan, University of Basrah, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ningappa. M. Rolli, India.

(2) Avdesh Bhardawaj, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Attri Meenakshi, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Marwan Noori Ramadhan, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Eugene A. Silow, Laboratory of General Aquatic Biology, Institute of Biology, Irkutsk State University, Russia.

Reviewers:

(1) Hiteshvari V. Korat, Gujarat Natural Farming Science University, India.

(2) Seome Michael Swafo, University of Limpopo, South Africa.

(3) S. L. Yadav, Raffles University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ilham Grioui, Tunisia.

(2) Seiam Hassan Abd Elghany Seiam, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5+8+8+6=30.5/4=7.625

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hiteshvari V. Korat, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Seome Michael Swafo, South Africa) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (S. L. Yadav, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Re-Review Report_1_v1 (Hiteshvari V. Korat, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Re-Review Report_2_v1 (Seome Michael Swafo, South Africa) | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Dariusz Jacek Jakobczak, Technical University of Koszalin, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Rakesh Choudhary, Bhartiya Skill Development University Jaipur, India.

(2) Saurabh Kumar, Vijaybhoomi University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rakesh Choudhary, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Saurabh Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA