Peer Review History: Curriculum Models for Teaching English and Chinese: A Pedagogical and Comparative Perspective

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Tin-Chun Lin, School of Business and Economics, Indiana University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Kottin Assogba Evariste, University of Abomey-Calavi, Benin.

(2) Ali Taghinezhad, Fasa University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

(3) Mohammed Abdulkareem A. Alkamel, Al-Qalam University for Humanities and Applied Sciences, Yemen.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) La Ode Rasmin, Universitas Muslim Buton, Indonesia.

(2) Nadia Mohamed Ben Amer, The Cyprus Institute, Cyprus.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kottin Assogba Evariste, Benin) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ali Taghinezhad, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Mohammed Abdulkareem A. Alkamel, Yemen) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised MS v1 and Feedback v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparative Analysis of Chen-type Distributions for Modelling Nigerian Stock Market: An Evaluation of Predictive Performance and Statistical Fit

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Dariusz Jacek Jakobczak, Chair, Technical University of Koszalin, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Ravindra Pratap Singh, Central University of Rajasthan, India.

(2) Emad Farhood Muhi, Southern Technical University, Iraq.

(3) Doaa Abd Khalil Elhertaniy, University of the Holy Quran and Taseel Science, Sudan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Nura Umar, Umaru Musa Yar’adua University, Nigeria.

(2) Pawan Kumar, GSVM Medical College, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ravindra Pratap Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Emad Farhood Muhi, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Doaa Abd Khalil Elhertaniy, Sudan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised MS v1 and Feedback v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Temporal Instability and Growth Trends of Lentil (Lens culinaris L.) in India: A Period-Wise Analysis from 2000 to 2021

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Eugene A. Silow, Laboratory of General Aquatic Biology, Institute of Biology, Irkutsk State University, Russia.

(2) Dr. Afroz Alam, Banasthali University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Jaslam Poolakkal, University of Idaho, United States.

(2) Sushan Chowhan, Bangladesh Institute of Nuclear Agriculture, Bangladesh.

(3) Nagaraja O, KLE Society’s JagadguruTontadarya College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jaslam Poolakkal, United States) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sushan Chowhan, Bangladesh) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Nagaraja O, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised MS v2 and Feedback v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Study of Composition of Adipic Esters by IR Spectroscopy

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Pradip K. Bhowmik, University of Nevada Las Vegas, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Vasanthaseelan S, Sri Krishna College of Technology, India.

(2) Kalu Michael Kalu, Gombe State University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) K. E. Ajibulu, Bamidele Olumilua University of Education Science and Technology, Nigeria.

(2) Syed Ahamed Hussain I, Presidency college (autonomous), India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Vasanthaseelan S, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kalu Michael Kalu, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Advancements and Challenges of Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Medicine: An Overview

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohd Saidin Misnan, Associate Professor, Universiti Teknologi, Malaysia.

Reviewers:

(1) Bhuvaneshwari Patil, Presidency University, India.

(2) Veera Boopathy E, Karpagam Institute Of Technology, India.

(3) Antony Pradeesh, KG College of Arts and Science, India.

(4) B.V.Rama Krishna, Vignan Institute of Science & Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Deepak Sethi, Rabindra Nath Tagore Medical College, India.

(2) Abrouki  Younes, Mohammed V University in Rabat, Morocco.

(3) Asna Khan, Gulbarga Institute Of Medical Sciences, India.

(4) Ganesh Narasimhan, St. Peters Institute of Higher Education and Research (SPIHER), India.

(5) Ilker Ilhanli, Ondokuz Mayıs University Faculty of Medicine, Turkiye.

(6) Martha Orendu Oche Attah, Cyprus International University, Nicosia.

(7) Meera Rath, UTHSCSA, USA.

(8) Praful V. Nandankar, Government College of Engineering Nagpur, India.

(9) R.Vajubunnisa Begum, Vels institute of science technology and advanced studies[VISTAS], India.

(10) Sameh. S. Akkila, Mustansiriyah University, Iraq.

(11) Tarun Singh, Bhagwan Das Hospital, India.

(12) Tshima Guyguy Kabundi, Universite Notre-Dame Du Kasayi (Uka), Universite De Kinshasa (Unikin), Democratic Republic of the Congo.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.07/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Bhuvaneshwari Patil, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Veera Boopathy E, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Antony Pradeesh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (B.V.Rama Krishna, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Grass and Tree Species Richness and Diversity at Ogongo Game Park in Namibia

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinayaka K.S, Assistant Professor& Head, Sri Venkataramana Swamy College, Karnataka, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Arvind Sawane, Anand Niketan College, India.

(2) Ndjouondo Gildas Parfait, The University of Bamenda, Cameroon.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ahmad Rufai Musa, Federal University, Nigeria.

(2) Basvarajaiah DM, Karnataka Veterinary Animal and Fisheries Sciences  University, Republic of India.

(3) Ndjouondo Gildas Parfait, The University of Bamenda, Cameroon.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.50/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Arvind Sawane, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ndjouondo Gildas Parfait, Cameroon) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impact of TQM Dimensions on the Performance of Julius Berger Nigeria PLC

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Guanghua Han, Assistant Professor, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Abbas Biglar, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

(2) Syeda Amtul Mahaboob, Mesco Institute of Management and Computer Sciences, Osmania University, India.

(3) Muhammad Jabbar Hadi, Al-Furat Al-Awsat Technical University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Arif Zunaidi, Indonesia.

(2) Joseph Odia, Alvan Ikoku Federal University of Education Owerri, Nigeria.

(3) Karthik Hosavaranchi Puttaraju, USA.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Abbas Biglar, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Syeda Amtul Mahaboob, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Muhammad Jabbar Hadi, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised MS v1 and Feedback v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Tree Canopy Cover and Forest Structure Analysis at University of Namibia Ogongo Campus

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Pedro Antonio Hernandez Cruz, Proteomic and Glycobiology of cancer Laboratory, Autonomous University “Benito Juarez” of Oaxaca. México.

Reviewers:

(1) Juhardi Sembiring, Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Sumatera Utara, Indonesia.

(2) Tamas Misik, Eszterhazy Kaoly Catholic University, Hungary.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Parisutha Rajan, Dr. M.G.R Educational and Research Institute, India.

(2) Roxan Eupeña-Caray, North Eastern Mindanao State University, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage:  8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Juhardi Sembiring, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Tamas Misik, Hungary) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessing the Performance of Zero-Truncated Count Distributions in Modelling Brent Crude Oil Price in Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Fabricio Moraes de Almeida, Federal University of Rondonia, Campus de Porto Velho, Brasil.

Reviewers:

(1) Adetunji, A. A., Federal Polytechnic, Nigeria.

(2) Abdalah Shaibu Amiri, University of the People, Tanzania.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Nikhil Bhardwaj, National Institute of technology, India.

(2) Ahmed Hasan Hadi, Iraq.

(3) Chis Timur, Oil and Gas University, Romania.

(4) Destaings Nyenyi Nyongesa, School of Business & Economics, Maseno University, Kenya.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Adetunji, A. A., Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Abdalah Shaibu Amiri, Tanzania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Environmental and Health Impact of Quarrying among Residents of Akure, Ondo State, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Giuseppe Murdaca, University of Genoa, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Julie Rose D. Apdohan, Caraga State University, Philippines.

(2) Gopi Krishna Pitchika, Vikrama Simhapuri University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anupma Kumari, Patna University, India.

(2) Ruma Purkait, University of Allahabad, India.

(3) Janet Temitope Asifat, University of Ilesa, Nigeria.

(4) Sharadkumar Mallikarjun Nimbale, Yashwantrao Chavan Institute of Science, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Julie Rose D. Apdohan, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Gopi Krishna Pitchika, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA