Peer Review History: Evaluation of Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Germplasm for Wheat Rust Diseases Resistance and Yield Performance

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Afroz Alam, Banasthali  Vidyapith, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Silas Chiko Sadamo, Wolaita Sodo University, Ethiopia.

(2) Subarna Sharma, Tribhivan University, Nepal.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Silas Chiko Sadamo, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Subarna Sharma, Nepal) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Exploring the Microbiome of Mobile Devices: Implications for Public Health and Hygiene

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Chung-Jen Chiang, China Medical University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Syed Mohammed Miqdad, Yenepoya Deemed To Be University, India.

(2) B. Bharathi, MMM College of Health Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Syed Mohammed Miqdad, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (B. Bharathi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Review on Plant-microbe Interactions and its Defence Mechanism

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Hon H. Ho, Professor, State University of New York, New Paltz, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Abiodun Oladipo, Nanjing Forestry University, Nigeria.

(2) Amit Kumar Jain, Indira Gandhi National Open University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Abiodun Oladipo, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Amit Kumar Jain, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Healing Through Dialogue: Exploring Culturally Sensitive Physician-Patient Communication in Urban and Peri-urban Minna, Nigeria, for Addressing Postpartum Depression

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Stan Weeber, Professor, Mc Neese State University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Aqsa Iram Shahzadi, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Pakistan.

(2) Selma Hancioglu Aytac, Istanbul Esenyurt University, Türkiye.

(3) Ameelia Sadaqat, Lahore Medical & Dental College, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Gopinath Subramanian, DRNTRUHS, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Aqsa Iram Shahzadi, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Selma Hancioglu Aytac, Türkiye) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ameelia Sadaqat, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised MS v2 and Feedback v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Molecular Detection and Isolation of Chicken Astrovirus from Commercial Chicken Flocks of Kerala, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Chung-Jen Chiang, China Medical University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) P. Sankar, Veterinary College and Research Institute, India.

(2) Mohammad Abdul Rahmman Mohammad, Baghdad University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Deepika Lather, Lala Lapat Rai University Of Veterinary And Animal Sciences, India.

(2) Essam Samir Soliman, Suez Canal University, Egypt.

(3) J. N. Ikpe, Akanu Ibiam Federal Polytechnic, Nigeria.

(4) Md. Nasir Uddin, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Bangladesh.

(5) Mohammed Ali Makki AlRubaee, Wasit university, Iraq.

(6) Neethu Asokan, DAV University, India.

(7) Oyekemi Akinmusire, University of Maiduguri, Nigeria.

(8) Peter Ayodeji Idowu, Tshwane University of Technology, South Africa.

(9) Prafullakumar Vasantrao Patil, COVAS, Udgir, MAFSU, India.

(10) Zagrai Gavrilă, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

(11) Zirak M R Palani, University of Kirkuk, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (P. Sankar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mohammad Abdul Rahmman Mohammad, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Different Seed Treatment on Germination of Fishtail Palm (Caryota urens) under Naturally Ventilated Poly-house Conditions

Editor(s):

(1) Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Khoy, West Azarbayjan, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Bentekhici Meriem, Djillali Liabés University of Sidi Bel Abbés, Algeria.

(2) Gokul Suresh Bajaj, Brijlal Biyani Science College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Bentekhici Meriem, Algeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Gokul Suresh Bajaj, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Advances in Plant Disease Diagnostics and Surveillance- A review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Hon H. Ho, Professor, State University of New York, New Paltz, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Munawar Ali, Khwaja Fareed University of Engineering and Information Technology, Pakistan.

(2) Rajesh Kumar Patel, Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Munawar Ali, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rajesh Kumar Patel, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Community-Led Participatory Forest Monitoring for the Restoration of Kibale National Park (KNP) in Western Uganda

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Kursad Demirel, Associate Professor, Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Canakkale, Turkey.

(2) Dr. Vinayaka K.S, Assistant Professor and Hod, Sri Venkataramana Swamy College, D.K. Karnataka, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Ghanashyam Sharma, The Mountain Institute, India.

(2) Alelgn Ewunetu Temesgen, Woldia Universty, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mohsin Salahuddin, Pakistan.

(2) Muhammad Rafique, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ghanashyam Sharma, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Alelgn Ewunetu Temesgen, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Acute Manic Episode and Psychosis as Early Manifestations of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus with Lupus Nephritis: A Case Report

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rafik Karaman, College of Pharmacy, Al-Quds University, Jerusalem, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Mahesh Vidavaluru, Narayana Medical College and Hospital, Dr NTRUHS, India.

(2) Somina Shaikh, Dow University oh Health Sciences, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mahesh Vidavaluru, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Somina Shaikh, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of Biomass, Carbon Stock and Sequestered CO2 in Teak (Tectona grandis L.f.) Plantation at Pt. Ravishankar Shukla University Campus, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ravi Kant Chaturvedi, Centre for Integrative Conservation, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, P. R. China.

Reviewers:

(1) Murali K V, College of Forestry, Kerala Agricultural University, India.

(2) Wakshum Shifeaw Gemeda, Arba Minch University, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anmol Negi, Mata Gujri College, India.

(2) Bijay Kumar Singh, Birsa Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Murali K V, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Wakshum Shifeaw Gemeda, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA