Peer Review History: CRISPR-Cas9 Applications in Horticultural Crop Improvement

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Fawzy Ramadan Hasssanien, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, KSA.

Reviewers:

(1) Arnab Mandal, Vidyasagar University, India.

(2) Byomkesh Dash, ICAR-National Rice Research Institute, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) K. Priyatham, SKUAST-J, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Arnab Mandal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Byomkesh Dash, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised MS v1 and Feedback v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Leveraging AI in Drug and Substance Abuse Recovery: A Systematic Approach to Reintegration and Rehabilitation for the Homeless

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ashish Anand, Montgomery Veteran Affairs Medical Center, Jackson, MS, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Precious Ojo Uahomo, University of Port Harcourt, Nigeria.

(2) Aftab Hussain, Riphah International University, Pakistan.

(3) Anmol Lama, Visva Bharati University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ferydoon Khamooshi, University of Zabol, Iran.

(2) Lalita Devi, Guru Nanak Dev University, India.

(3) Rahmat Pannyiwi, Defense University of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Precious Ojo Uahomo, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Aftab Hussain, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Anmol Lama, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised MS v1 and Feedback v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: From Tradition to Modernity: China’s Education System ‘‘A Product of Legal Design”

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Tin-Chun Lin, Indiana University Northwest, USA.

(2) Dr. Abdullah Aydin, Kırşehir Ahi Evran University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Tuti Suartini, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia.

(2) Ashokkumar Baldevbhai Prajapati, Soorajba College of Education, Kadi Sarva Vishwavidyalaya-Gandhinagar, India.

(3) Ritu Sharma, University Of Jammu, India.

(4) Doris Muthoni Nthuku, Masinde Muliro University of Science and Technology Kenya, Kenya.

(5) Avitesh Vaishnavi Nayak, Sushant University, Gurugram, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anjali Patwardhan Kulkarni, India.

(2) Onyango Benard Okelo, Kisii University, Kenya.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Tuti Suartini, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ashokkumar Baldevbhai Prajapati, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ritu Sharma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Doris Muthoni Nthuku, Kenya) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_5 (Avitesh Vaishnavi Nayak, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised MS v1 and Feedback v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised MS v2 and Feedback v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Revised MS v3 and Feedback v3 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of Trend Dynamics of Lentil Crop in India using Statistical Models

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ghulam Khaliq, Lasbela University of Agriculture, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) N. Gnanasankaran, Thiagarajar College, India.

(2) Anju Sharma, Dr Y S Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, India.

(3) Rajarathinam Arunachalam, Manonmaniam Sundaranar University, India.

(4) Arijit De, KPR Institute of Engineering and Technology, Affiliated to Anna University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (N. Gnanasankaran, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Anju Sharma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Rajarathinam Arunachalam, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Arijit De, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised MS v1 and Feedback v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Genetic Diversity Analysis of Grain Yield and its Attributing Traits in Different Genotypes of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Hon H. Ho, State University of New York, New Paltz, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Maria Andrea Esposito, Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Agropecuaria (INTA), Argentina.

(2) Ranju Kumari, MBAC, Agwanpur, Saharsa, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Chandramaniya Chiragkumar Pravinbhai, Anand Agricultural University (AAU), India.

(2) Rajni Devi, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Maria Andrea Esposito, Argentina) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ranju Kumari, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised MS v1 and Feedback v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Nutritional Enhancement and Organoleptic Assessment of Gluten-free and Millet-based Murukku Fortified with Chia Seeds (Salvia hispanica L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ghulam Khaliq, Lasbela University of Agriculture, Water & Marine Sciences, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Shubham Thapa, HNBGU (A Central University), India.

(2) Annalakshmi Chatterjee, University of Calcutta, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Agbaje Rafiu, Kwara State Polytechnic, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shubham Thapa, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Annalakshmi Chatterjee, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised MS v1 and Feedback v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Swine Wastewater Treatment on Fungal Population and Physicochemical Characteristics of Soil

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Anil Kumar, Devi Ahilya University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) M. Mohan, Mahendra Engineering College, India.

(2) Kshitij Dhameliya, RK University, India.

(3) Abu Imran Mallick, West Bengal State University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Denis M.K. Amara, Njala University, Sierra Leone.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.17/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (M. Mohan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kshitij Dhameliya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Abu Imran Mallick, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised MS v1 and Feedback v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Neoliberalism and Gender Justice: Examining Economic Reforms and Feminist Responses in India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Sofia Pedrosa Gomes dos Santos, University of Lisbon, Portugal.

(2) Prof. Tin-Chun Lin, Indiana University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Francis Maushe, Midlands State University, Zimbabwe.

(2) Poornima Pundhir Arora, Oriental Institute of Science & Technology, India.

(3) Yogita K S, Karnataka University Dharwad, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Eunice Fonyuy Fondze-Fombele, University of Buea, Cameroon.

(2) Gloria Ojonoka Dangana-Onuche, Prince Abubakar Audu University, Nigeria.

(3) Indra Bhaskar Mishra, University of Lucknow, India.

(4) P. Sindhuja, Alagappa University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.57/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Francis Maushe, Zimbabwe) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Poornima Pundhir Arora, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Yogita K S, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised MS v1 and Feedback v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised MS v2 and Feedback v2 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Synthesis and Spectroscopic Characterization of Manganese-Theophylline-Dicarboxylic Acid Complexes

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ahmed Mohammed Abu-Dief Mohammed, Sohag University, Egypt, Taibah University, Saudi Arabia.

Reviewers:

(1) Juan Enrique Tacoronte Morales, Technical University Of Esmeraldas, Ecuador.

(2) Atar Singh Kushwah, Women’s Biomedical Research Institute, USA.

(3) Shashwat Pandey, University of Lucknow, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) H. Sirajunisha, Bishop Heber College, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Juan Enrique Tacoronte Morales, Ecuador) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Atar Singh Kushwah, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Shashwat Pandey, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised MS v1 and Feedback v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Differential Maltosazone Crystal Formation in Selected Packaged Food Products Using the Osazone Test

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ghulam Khaliq, Lasbela University, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Tamara Premovic, “Union-Nikola Tesla” University in Belgrade, Republic of Serbia.

(2) Elbar Djenette, Algeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Kitisart Kraboun, Rajamangala University of Technology Krungthep, Thailand.

(2) Priscila Barbosa Bezerra Nunes, Federal Rural University of Pernambuco, Brasil.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Tamara Premovic, Republic of Serbia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Elbar Djenette, Algeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised MS v1 and Feedback v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA