Category Archives: Review History

Peer Review History: Electronic Waste Exposure and Public Health Risks among Informal Recycling Workers: A Critical Narrative Review of Occupational Mixtures, Health Effects and Prevention

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Giuseppe Murdaca, University of Genoa, Italy.

(2) Dr. Anjaneyulu Vinukonda, Strides Pharma Inc., USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Amjad Iqbal Burq, Islam Medical College, Pakistan.

(2) Steffy Abraham, Parul University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Vinita Jamdade, Bharati Vidyapeeth, College of Nursing, India.

(2) Aamna Shah, The University of Lahore, Pakistan.

(3) Mahera Imam, Bharathidasan University, India.

(4) Oghenepawon David Obriki, Qatar.

(5) Shivagouda Patil, D.Y. Patil College of Nursing, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Amjad Iqbal Burq, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Steffy Abraham, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Floral Resources and Foraging Preferences of Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) in an Apiary Area of Northern Côte d’Ivoire

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinayaka K.S, Sri Venkataramana Swamy College India.

Reviewers:

(1) Sulbha Vilas Kulkarni, Nagpur University, India.

(2) Stephen F. Sikolia, Maseno University, Kenya.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Habiba Usman Aliyu, Federal University of Kashere, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.6/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sulbha Vilas Kulkarni, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Stephen F. Sikolia Maseno University, Kenya) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Effect on the Growth Rate of Sweet Corn through Zinc and Iron biofortification under Temperate Ecology of Kashmir

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinayaka K.S, Sri Venkataramana Swamy College, Karnataka, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Tammam Kheder Yaghi, Bucharest University, Netherlands.

(2) Sayed Mohammad Reza Khoshroo, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Tammam Kheder Yaghi, Netherlands) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sayed Mohammad Reza Khoshroo, Iran) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Efficacy of Varied Liquid Microbial Formulations on the Growth and Yield Performance of Mulberry (Morus indica L.)

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rasmia Sayed Sayed Darwesh, Central Laboratory for Date Palm Research and Development and Agriculture Research Center, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Calugar Anamaria, University of Agricultural Science and Veterinary , Romania.

(2) Kuna Karthik, DR YSRHU, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Husam Mohammed Muhi, Iraq.

(2) Giovanni Guimarães Landa, Centro Universitario Vale do Cricaré (UNIVC), Brazil.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Calugar Anamaria, Romania) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kuna Karthik, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised MS v2 and Feedback v2 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Diversity and Molecular Characterization of Fungal Pathogens Associated with Paddy in the Cauvery Delta Region

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ravi Kant Chaturvedi, Chinese Academy of Sciences, P.R. China.

Reviewers:

(1) Saritha Pendlikatla, SGS arts college, India.

(2) Milda Ernita, Universitas Tamansiswa Padang, Indonesia.

(3) Sanjeev Ravi, VCSG UUHF, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Saritha Pendlikatla, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Milda Ernita, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sanjeev Ravi, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Integrating Multi-omics and Artificial Intelligence for Next-generation Crop Improvement: Advances, Constraints and Future Directions

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. S. Prabhu, Sri Venkateswara College of Engineering, Sriperumbudur, India.

Reviewers:

(1) A. Nithish, SKLTGHU, India.

(2) Smital Poojary, Unicemed Medical Centre, Canada.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Lopamudra Jena, Sri Sri University, India.

(2) Sumedh Sanjay Joshi, All India Insitute Of Medical Sciences, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (A. Nithish, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Smital Poojary, Canada) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Influence of Various Levels of IBA and NAA on Shoot Development and Survival of Stem Cuttings in Dragon Fruit

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Hon H. Ho , State University of New York, New Paltz, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Hassan Alkarawi, Al-Furat Al-Awast Technical University, Iraq.

(2) Shobha Johari, L. B. S. Government College. Kotputli, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hassan Alkarawi, Iraq) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shobha Johari, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: One Health, One Genome: A Critical Appraisal of Artificial Intelligence–enabled Genomics for Global Infectious Disease Surveillance

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ashish Anand, William Carey School of Osteopathic Medicine, Mississipi, USA And University of Mississipi Medical Center, Mississipi, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Mohamed Belomaria, Ibn Tofail University, Morocco.

(2) Muhammad Mohsin Zahoor, University Hospital Limerick, Ireland.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Aamna Shah, The University of Lahore, Sargodha Campus, Pakistan.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mohamed Belomaria, Morocco) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Muhammad Mohsin Zahoor, Ireland) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Revisiting Rice Parboiling: Emerging Processing Technologies, Multi-objective Optimisation and Future Directions

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Golubkina Nadezhda Alexandrovna, All-Russian Institute of Vegetable Breeding And Seeds Production, Russia.

Reviewers:

(1) Nada Basheir Ali Akaree, Sabratha University , Libya.

(2) Parthkumar Sapariya, Parul University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nada Basheir Ali Akaree, Libya) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Parthkumar Sapariya, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised MS v2 and Feedback v2 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: ROS-Induced Lipid Peroxidation and Upregulated Antioxidant Activity in Lemna minor under Heavy Metal and Herbicide Stress

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. A. Jeyasankar, Govt. Arts College, India.

(2) Prof. Ahmed Awad Talb Altalb, University of Mosul, Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Garima Borah, Assam Down Town University, India.

(2) Davoud Balarak, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Garima Borah, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Davoud Balarak, Iran) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA