Peer Review History: Public Debt and Infrastructural Development in Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Guanghua Han, Assistant Professor, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Felix Fofana N’Zue, University Felix Houphouet Boigny, Côte d’Ivoire.

(2) A. Manikyamba, Pendekanti Law College, Osmania University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Felix Fofana N’Zue, Côte d’Ivoire) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (A. Manikyamba, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Improving Productivity in Automotive Manufacturing: A Combined Approach of Root Cause Analysis and Sem Models

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Shi-Hai Dong, Professor, Superior School of Physics and Mathematics, National Polytechnic Institute, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Uttam Kumar Khedlekar, Dr. Harisingfh Gour Vishwavidyalya, India.

(2) Kamal Sabri Bin Kamarudin, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) L.Anojkumar, Jansons Institute of Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Uttam Kumar Khedlekar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kamal Sabri Bin Kamarudin, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Re-Review report_2_v1 (Kamal Sabri Bin Kamarudin, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Media Impact on Aquaponics System Performance: A Comparitive Study on Lettuce Crop Parameters

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Shi Yin, College of Economics and Management, Hebei Agricultural University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Agustinus N Kairupan, Indonesia.

(2) Thomas Opiyo Okumu, Kenya.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Agustinus N Kairupan, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Thomas Opiyo Okumu, Kenya) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Farmers’ Knowledge in Improved Maize Production Practices in Katni District of Madhya Pradesh, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Palle E. T. Jorgensen, Professor, The University of Iowa, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Simpa, Ondeku James, Federal Polytechnic, Nasarawa, Nigeria.

(2) Ruri Aditya Sari, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Politeknik LP3I Medan, Indonesia.

(3) Manisha, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Simpa, Ondeku James, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ruri Aditya Sari, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Manisha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: An Analysis of Current Scenario and Future Prospects for District Central Cooperative Bank Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Kai-Long Hsiao, Taiwan Shoufu University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Ruthwinne Munene, Mount Kenya University, Kenya.

(2) Masno, S.E., Pamulang University, Indonesia.

(3) Jose Calasanz Julysses D. Tabia, St. Vincent’s College, Philippines.

(4) Mustafa Göktuğ kaya, KTO Karatay University, Turkey.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Matei Adrian Ducu, Athenaeum University Bucharest, Romania.

(2) S. Sundara Ram, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ruthwinne Munene, Kenya) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Masno, S.E., Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Jose Calasanz Julysses D. Tabia, Philippines) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Mustafa Göktuğ kaya, Turkey) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluating Instructional Package for Teaching Mathematics for the Hearing-impaired Students

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Abdullah Aydin, Kırşehir Ahi Evran University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Lays Santos França, Brasil.

(2) Darmawan Budiyanto, Universitas Tridinanti, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Lays Santos França, Brasil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Darmawan Budiyanto, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Isolation, Characterisation and Identification of Bacteria from Three Different Unpasteurized Fruit Juices Sold at a Local Market in Guyana

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Anil Kumar, Devi Ahilya University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Ravichandra V D, St. John’s Pharmacy College, India.

(2) Rajeshri Patel, Kadi Sarva Vishwa Vidyalaya University, India.

(3) Shoket Ali, Geetanjali University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ravichandra V D, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rajeshri Patel, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Shoket Ali, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Transforming Key Industries in Rivers State: The Impact of Automation and Artificial Intelligence on the Future of Work

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Fabricio Moraes de Almeida, Federal University of Rondonia, Campus de Porto Velho, Brasil.

Reviewers:

(1) Lingala Thirupathi, Sreenidhi Institute of Science and Technology, India.

(2) Suchivrat Arya, Bennett University, India.

(3) Nivetha Martin, Arul Anandar College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) M. Bharathi, Jayaprakash Narayan College of Engineering, Bharath.

(2) G. Jenifa, Madanapalle Institute of Technology and Science, India.

(3) M. Bharathi, Jayaprakash Narayan College of Engineering, India.

(4) Shahera S.Patel, Sardar Patel University, India.

(5) T. Mangaiyarkarasi, Srm Institute Of Science And Technology, India.

(6) Zina A. Al Shadidi, Al Ma’ moun University College, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.46/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Lingala Thirupathi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Suchivrat Arya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Nivetha Martin, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Response of Maize (Zea mays L.) to Poultry Dung Compost on Sandy Soil in Toumodi, Central Côte d’Ivoire

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinayaka K.S, Assistant Professor & Head, Sri Venkataramana Swamy College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Narendra Chaudhary, ICAR-NRCSS, Ajmer, India.

(2) Abhishek Dadhich, Manipal University Jaipur, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.1/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Narendra Chaudhary, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Abhishek Dadhich, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: ‘Spicing up’ with Biotechnology: Trends and Developments in Black Pepper (Piper nigrum) Research

Editor(s):

(1) Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Awah Chukwuma Quintus, Nigeria.

(2) Mohamed Mohamed El-Komi, National Institute of Oceanography and Fisheries Alexandria, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Eman Ibrahim El-Sayed Abdel-Wahab, Egypt.

(2) Nadiezhda Cabral, Mexico.

(3) Otiobo Atibita Esther Nadine, The University of Douala, Cameroon.

(4) Walaa Abdel-kader Ramadan Ibrahim, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.85/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Awah Chukwuma Quintus, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mohamed Mohamed El-Komi, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA