Peer Review History: Research on the Biochemical Alterations in Mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] Caused by the Mungbean Yellow Mosaic India Virus (MYMIV)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Zhong-Guang Li, Professor, Yunnan Normal University, Yunnan, People,s Republic of China.

Reviewers:

(1) Munifa Jabeen, Government College University Faisalabad, Pakistan.

(2) Farshid Talat, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Munawar Fazal, College of Commerce, Arts & Science (Patliputra University), India.

(2) Udokang, Anietie Edem, The Federal Polytechnic Offa, Nigeria.

(3) Dhia Ahmed Taain, University of Basrah, Iraq.

(4) Mohamed KHAMAR, Mohammed V University in Rabat Morocco.

(5) Rukmani Dewangan, College of Veterinary Science & A. H., Anjora, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Munifa Jabeen, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Farshid Talat, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Breeding Techniques and Approaches for Developing Abiotic Stress-tolerant Crop Cultivars: A Comprehensive Review

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Hon H. Ho, State University of New York, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Avijit Mukherjee, Netaji Mahavidyalaya, India.

(2) Sitesh Chatterjee, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Avijit Mukherjee, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sitesh Chatterjee, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Novel Biotechnological Strategies to Boost Disease Resistance and Enhance Quality Parameters in Horticultural Plants

Editor(s):

(1) Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Sewgil  S. Anwer, Hawler Medical University, Iraq.

(2) Monika Szabóová, Plant Science and Biodiversity Centre, Slovakia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Alabi Olusoji David, Durban University of Technology, South Africa.

(2) Faithful Ivbarue Oshone, Ekiti State University, Nigeria.

(3) Hassan Nima Habib, University of Basrah, College of Agriculture, Iraq.

(4) Kartik Uniyal, Sardar Bhagwan Singh University, India.

(5) A Muthu Kumar, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sewgil S. Anwer, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Monika Szabóová, Slovakia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Different Level of Potassium and Sulfur Fertilizers on Growth and Yield of Onion (Allium cepa L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Surendra Singh Bargali, Head & Director, Kumaun University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Mohamed Mohamed El-Komi, Egypt.

(2) P. Balaganesh, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Maria Erivalda Farias De Aragão, Universidade Estadual do Ceará, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mohamed Mohamed El-Komi, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (P.Balaganesh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Different Planting Dates on Tuber Production in Dahlia (Dahlia variabilis L.) in Low Hill Conditions of Himachal Pradesh, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Hon H. Ho, State University of New York, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Hayder Azeez Ali Al-Shebly, Al-Furat Al-Awsat Technical, Iraq.

(2) Marcio de Souza Dias, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Nitale M’Balikine Krou, University of Kara, Togo.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hayder Azeez Ali Al-Shebly, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Marcio de Souza Dias, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Magneto-optical Properties of Iron-bulk Metallic Glasses Sustainably Produced from Iron-rich Sand Sludge

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sandip Kumar Dhara, Indira Gandhi Centre for Atomic Resaerch, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Abhijit Bhowmik, Dream Institute of Technology, India.

(2) Qasim M. Shakir, University of Kufa, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Pedro Vera Serna, Universidad Politécnica de Tecámac, Mexico.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.65/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Abhijit Bhowmik, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Qasim M. Shakir, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Morphological Variations and Germination Behaviour of Seeds of Four Fodder Tree Species

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Eugene A. Silow, Irkutsk State University, Russia.

Reviewers:

(1) Abidemi Benjamen Atteh, University of Stirling, Scotland.

(2) Abeer Abdelaty Ahmed, Agriculture Research Centre, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) M.Ananthi, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

(2) S.Durai, Vel Tech Rangarajan Dr.Sagunthala R&D Institute of Science Technology, India.

(3) Ghram Imen, Institut Supérieur des Sciences Biologiques appliquées de Tunis, Tunisia.

(4) Nazmoon Naher Tonu, Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University, Bangladesh.

(5) Siddhi Gupta, Maharaja Ganga Singh University Bikaner, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.55/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Abidemi Benjamen Atteh, Scotland) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Abeer Abdelaty Ahmed, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of the Genetic Diversity in Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) Genotypes for Yield and its Attributing Traits Using D2 Statistics

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Zhong-Guang Li, Yunnan Normal University, People,s Republic of China.

Reviewers:

(1) Maria Cristina de Souza, Federal University of Acre, Brasil.

(2) M.R. Suchitra, Sastra Deemed To Be University, India.

(3) Kinjal Mondal, Maharana Pratap University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.96/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Maria Cristina de Souza, Brasil) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (M.R. Suchitra, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Kinjal Mondal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Enhancing Okra Yield and Quality: Synergistic Impact of Biopesticides Combined with Cypermethrin against Shoot and Fruit Borer [Earias vittella Fab.]

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Afroz Alam, Banasthali University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Ria Manurung, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Komputer Yos Sudarso, Indonesia.

(2) Daniel Alejandro Gorrer, Universidad Nacional de Jujuy, Argentina.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ria Manurung, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Daniel Alejandro Gorrer, Argentina) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Unveiling the Nutritional, Therapeutic, and Environmental Impact of Oyster Mushrooms (Pleurotus species): A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Sheng Zhang, Bohai University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Umeh, Ugochukwu Stanley, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Nigria.

(2) M.João Reis LimaPolytechnic University of Viseu, Portugal.

(3) Sutanu Samanta, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anwar Hussain, United States.

(2) Zarina Zakaria, University of Malaysia Perlis, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.35/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Umeh, Ugochukwu Stanley, Nigria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (M. João Reis Lima, Portugal) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sutanu Samanta, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA