Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vincenzo Tufarelli, University of Bari ‘Aldo Moro’, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Geeta Singh, JNKVV Jabalpur, India.

(2) Serhii Rieznik, State Biotechnological University, Ukraine.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Geeta Singh, India ) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Serhii Rieznik, Ukraine) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chung-Jen Chiang, China Medical University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Yerra Achyutha Valli Devi, Andhra University, India.

(2) Sanjeev Jakatimath, Keladi Shivappa Nayak University of Agricutlural and Horticutlural Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Yerra Achyutha Valli Devi, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sanjeev Jakatimath, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Qiankun Song, Chongqing Jiaotong University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Madan Lal, Mahatma Jyotiba Phule Rohilkhand University, India.

(2) T. Jayakumar, Sri Ramakrishna Mission Vidyalaya College of Arts and Science, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Megha Dorle Chakole, Yeshwantrao Chavan College of Engineering, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Madan Lal, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (T. Jayakumar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Pedro Antonio Hernandez Cruz, Autonomous University “Benito Juarez” of Oaxaca. México.

Reviewers:

(1) Seniuk Igor, National University of Pharmacy Kharkiv, Ukraine.

(2) Vinu Choudhary, Bisu Hospital & Fertility Centre, India.

(3) Constance Chinyere Ezemba, Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu University, Nigeria.

(4) Asha Bhausaheb Kadam, Dada Patil Mahavidylaya, Phule Pune University, India.

(5) C. Initha Lebanon Ebency, University of Madras, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Seniuk Igor, Ukraine) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Vinu Choudhary, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Constance Chinyere Ezemba, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Asha Bhausaheb Kadam, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_5 (C. Initha Lebanon Ebency, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Qiankun Song, Chongqing Jiaotong University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Mohamed. S. Hamed, Gulf Colleges, KSA.

(2) Jaber Kazempoor, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran.

(3) A.Manickam, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mohamed. S. Hamed, KSA) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jaber Kazempoor, Iran) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (A. Manickam, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Hon H. Ho, State University of New York, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Anamika Rana, India.

(2) João Rufino de Freitas Filho, Rural Federal University of Pernambuco, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Sayed Mohammad Reza Khoshroo, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

(2) Afam Uzorka, Kampala International University, Uganda.

(3) María Auxiliadora Márquez Riquel, University or Institution of Reviewer National Experimental University of the Armed Forces (UNEFA), Venezuela.

(4) R.Abdul Vahith, Jamal Mohamed College (Autonomous), India.

(5) Reena Saxena, Suresh Gyan Vihar University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Anamika Rana, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (João Rufino de Freitas Filho, Brazil) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ravi Kant Chaturvedi, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences,P.R. China.

Reviewers:

(1) Seyed Ehsan Vesal, Italy.

(2) Ouaissa khadija, Morocco.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Rakesh Chandra, India.

(2) Aslı Şalcıoğlu, Turkiy.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Seyed Ehsan Vesal, Italy) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ouaissa Khadija, Morocco) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Shi Yin, Hebei Agricultural University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Lakshmi Dhar Hatai, Central Agricultural University, Pasighat, India.

(2) Liu Qi, Liaocheng University, China.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Lakshmi Dhar Hatai, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Liu Qi, China) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Journal Change_1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Qiankun Song, Professor, Jiaotong University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Hichem Khelifi, University of Algiers, Algeria.

(2) Mohamed Karim Hamdani, University of Sfax, Tunisia.

(3) Daniel Deborah, Olabisi Onabanjo University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Aida Tagiyeva, Azerbaijan.

(2) Mohammad Reza Heidari Tavani, Islamic Azad University, Ramhormoz Branch, Iran.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hichem Khelifi, Algeria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mohamed Karim Hamdani, Tunisia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Daniel Deborah, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ravi Kant Chaturvedi, Centre for Integrative Conservation, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, P.R. China.

Reviewers:

(1) Abeer Abdelaty Ahmed Mohammed, Agriculture Research Center, Egypt.

(2) Basant Kumar Dadarwal, Sri Karan Narendra Agriculture University, India.

(3) Ashish Lambat, Sevadal Mahila Mahavidyalaya, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Abeer Abdelaty Ahmed Mohammed, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Basant Kumar Dadarwal, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ashish Lambat, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA