Peer Review History: The Influence of Conservation Education on Pro-wildlife Sustainability Behaviour at the Eco-centric Zone of Budongo Central Forest Reserve in Buliisa District, Uganda

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinayaka K.S, Assitant Professor and HOD, Sri Venkataramana Swamy College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Tizita Endale Elcho, Arba Minch University, Ethiopia.

(2) Nashipu Thalut, University of Bamenda, Cameroon.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Nashipu Thalut, Higher Teacher Training College, The University of Bamenda, Cameroon.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Tizita Endale Elcho, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nashipu Thalut, Cameroon) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Population Dynamics and Stock Status of the Round Sardinella (Sardinella aurita, Valenciennes, 1847) in the Coastal Waters of Côte d’Ivoire (West Africa)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Pedro Antonio Hernandez Cruz, Autonomous University “Benito Juarez” of Oaxaca. México

Reviewers:

(1) Mohammed Gaber Desouky, National Institute of Oceanography and Fisheries, Egypt.

(2) Israel O. Obaroh, Kampala International University, Uganda.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mohammed Gaber Desouky, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Israel O. Obaroh, Uganda) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Biotechnological Approaches for Enhancing Disease Resistance and Crop Quality in Horticultural Plants

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Seema Akbar, Regional Research Institute of Unani Medicine (CCRUM), University of Kashmir, Kashmir, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Jeverson Santiago Quishpe Gaibor, Salesian Polytechnic University, Ecuador.

(2) Marwan Noori Ramadhan, College of Agriculture, University of Basrah, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Asma Mahjoub, Biotechnology center de Borj Cedria, Tunisia.

(2) Farshid Talat, Iran.

(2) I Nengah Suwastika, Tadulako University, Indonesia.

(3) K. P. Suresh, India.

(4) Leonardo Ornella, Spain.

(5) Majid Abdulhameed Ibrahim, University of Basrah, Iraq.

(6) Shahira H. EL-Moslamy, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.30/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jeverson Santiago Quishpe Gaibor, Ecuador) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Marwan Noori Ramadhan, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of Power Density Radiation from Wi-Fi Enabled and Wi-Fi Disabled Laptops

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fabricio Moraes de Almeida, Professor, Federal University of Rondonia, Campus de Porto Velho, Brasil.

Reviewers:

(1) Asrar Ahmad Ansari, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Saudi Arabia.

(2) Ankita Malhotra, SVKM,s  D J Sanghvi College of Engineering, India.

(3) Saptarshi Gupta, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Rashmi Pandey, Parul University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Asrar Ahmad Ansari, Saudi Arabia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ankita Malhotra, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Saptarshi Gupta, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Ultraviolet Radiation from Welding Activities on Ocular Tissues of Albino Rats

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jamal- Odysseas Maaita, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.

Reviewers:

(1) Ravikumar Ch, CVR College of Engineering, India.

(2) Farshad Khoshnood, Technical and Vocational University, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ravikumar Ch, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Farshad Khoshnood, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Nutritional, Phytochemical, Functional and Antioxidant Properties of Acha, Chia and Soycake Flour Blends

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Cheorl-Ho Kim, Professor, Sungkyunkwan University, Korea and Samsung Advanced Institute of Health Science and Technology, Korea.

Reviewers:

(1) Kouassi  Kra Athanase, University of Abobo, Cote d’Ivoire.

(2) Lorina A. Galvez, Visayas State University, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kouassi Kra Athanase, Cote d’Ivoire) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Lorina A. Galvez, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effectiveness of Different Fungicides in Combating Tomato Powdery Mildew in Karnataka

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Hon H. Ho, Professor, State University of New York, New Paltz, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Virginia Meléndez Ramírez, University of Yucatan, Mexico.

(2) Shahira H. EL-Moslamy, Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology Research Institute, Egypt.

(3) Ujjal Kumar Pati, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Virginia Meléndez Ramírez, Mexico) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shahira H. EL-Moslamy, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ujjal Kumar Pati, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Consumer Personal Information Protection from a Comparative Law Perspective

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Omololu Fagbadebo, School of Management, IT & Governance, University of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.

Reviewers:

(1) Sudhir Kumar Jena, IIM Shillong, India.

(2) Bhrigu Raj Mourya, Teerthanker Mahaveer University, India.

(3) Priya, Univeristy of Lucknow, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Fitri Damayanti, Universitas Indraprasta PGRI, Indonesia.

(2) Lam Weng Hoe, Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sudhir Kumar Jena, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Bhrigu Raj Mourya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Priya, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Production of Highly Porous Fe-Si-Mg-C Alloy by Space Holder Method

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Pradip K. Bhowmik, University of Nevada Las Vegas, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Waseem Ullah Shah, University of Science and Technology, Pakistan.

(2) Poorna Chandra Rao B, Madras Institute of Technology Campus, Anna University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Waseem Ullah Shah, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Poorna Chandra Rao B, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Logico-semantic Relation of Projection in the Short Story ‘Ghost’

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Abdullah Aydin, Professor, Kırşehir Ahi Evran University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Syazliyati Ibrahim, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia.

(2) Amador Cernuda-Lago, King Juan Carlos University, Spain.

(3) Victorița Trif, University of Bucharest, Romania.

(4) Gentjana Taraj, ‘Aleksander Moisiu’ University, Albania.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Jeyaraj john sekar, The american college, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.63/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Syazliyati Ibrahim, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Amador Cernuda-Lago, Spain) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Victorița Trif, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Gentjana Taraj, Albania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA