Peer Review History: Assessment of Aluminum Alloy 6351 Eggshell Reinforced Composite in Dry Turning Using Response Surface Methodology

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Shi-Hai Dong, National Polytechnic Institute, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) P.Umamaheswarrao, Bapatla Engineering College, India.

(2) G.Prabu Ram, Anna University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (P.Umamaheswarrao, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (G.Prabu Ram, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Water Quality Testing of Yamuna River at Poiya Ghat (Vaikunth Dham / Swarg Dham), Agra

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Pradip K. Bhowmik, University of Nevada Las Vegas, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Tingting Cao, Northeast Normal University, China.

(2) Renisson Neponuceno de Araújo Filho, Federal University of Tocantins, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Tingting Cao, China) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Renisson Neponuceno de Araújo Filho, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Gut metagenome in Insects and Its Potential in Agricultural and Industrial Applications

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Hon H. Ho, State University of New York, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Deepak Prashar, LR Institute of Pharmacy, India.

(2) Manosha Perera, Griffith University (Alumni), Australia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Soumik Bhattacharjee, Gupta College Of Technological Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Deepak Prashar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Manosha Perera, Australia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Insights into the Roles of Giant Starships of Diversity in Fungal Genomes

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Hon H. Ho, State University of New York, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Mahmoud Abbas Ali Mohamed, South Valley University, Egypt.

(2) Prabhat Dessai, Dnyanprassarak Mandal’s College and Research Centre, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mahmoud Abbas Ali Mohamed, Egypt ) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Prabhat Dessai, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Design of ECG Circuit and Patient Remote Monitoring System Using MQTT Protocol for ECG Signals

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Shi-Hai Dong, Superior School of Physics and Mathematics, National Polytechnic Institute, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Sathishkumar S, Builders Engineering College, Anna University-Chennai, India.

(2) S.Balambigai, Karpagam College of Engineering, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sathishkumar S, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (S.Balambigai, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Exploring the Consumption Pattern of Millets among Rural Women of Udham Singh Nagar District of Uttarakhand, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Sanjay Mishra, SR Institute of Management & Technology, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Tadesse Girma Rasso, Kotebe University of Education, Ethiopia.

(2) Shamsedin Mahdi Hassan, Jigjiga University, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Zigale Semahegn Yitayeh, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Tadesse Girma Rasso, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shamsedin Mahdi Hassan, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Quality Assessment and Sensory Evaluation of Complementary Food from Orange Flesh Sweet Potato (OFSP), Soybean, and Tropical Almond Seed Composite Flour

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Golubkina Nadezhda Alexandrovna, Federal Scientific Vegetable Center, Russia.

Reviewers:

(1) Latha Rani R, University of Agricultural Sciences, GKVK, India.

(2) Wabi Bajo Nagessa, Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Latha Rani R, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Wabi Bajo Nagessa, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised MS v2 and Feedback v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of Genetic Diversity in Sorghum Genotypes via Simple Sequence Repeat (SSR) Markers

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ömer Kiliç, Associate Professor, Bingol University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Shaik Faheem Akhtar, India.

(2) Amir B Wani, SKUAST Kashmir, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Faith Fransisca Kavishe, Namibia University Of Sciene And Technology, Tanzania.

(2) Supriya, Agriculture University, India.

(3) Avinash Shivaji Jondhale, MJM Arts Commerce and Science College, India.

(4) Bilal Ahmad, Jilin Agriculture University, Pakistan.

(5) Saket Kumar, KPS Degree College Bundelkhand University Jhansi, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shaik Faheem Akhtar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Amir B Wani, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effects of Nitrogen Content and pH on Micropropagation of Rudraksha (Elaeocarpus ganitrus Roxb.)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Hon H. Ho, State University of New York, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Anita Pande, India.

(2) Ujjal Kumar Pati, India.

(3) Mahfut, Lampung University, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.67/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Anita Pande, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ujjal Kumar Pati, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Mahfut, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA