Peer Review History: Critical Peer Feedback for Oral Presentation at TEFL Tertiary Education: Comparison, Perception and Reflection

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Tin-Chun Lin, Professor, School of Business and Economics, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Catherine Nguoi Chui Lam, Politeknik Ibrahim Sultan, Malaysia.

(2) Nur Syafiqah Yaccob, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Agung Prasetyo Wibowo, Universitas Gunadarma, Indonesia.

(2) Nor Omaima Haurn, Malaysia.

(3) Shee Yuen Ling, University of Malaya, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Catherine Nguoi Chui Lam, Malaysia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nur Syafiqah Yaccob, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Phthalate Esters in Water and Surface Sediments of Anambra River in Dry Season: Distribution and Human Health Risks Assessment

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinayaka K.S, Assistant Professor and Hod, Sri Venkataramana Swamy College, D.K. Karnataka, India.

Reviewers:

(1) P. Lakahmi Devi Menon, Calicut University, India.

(2) Poonam Prakash Patil, Sanjivani College of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ivana Kostic Kokic, University of Nis, Serbia.

(2) José Belisario Leyva Morales, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo (UAEH), Mexico.

(3) Md. Shahid Khan, Jahangirnagar University, Bangladesh.

(4) M.V.Raju, Vignan’s Foundation for Science Technology and Research, India.

(5) Poonam Prakash Patil, India.

(6) Shahid Khan, Jahangirnagar University, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (P. Lakahmi Devi Menon, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Poonam Prakash Patil, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: In silico Analysis and Characterization of the F5H Gene Family in Sorghum bicolor and Its Role in Lignin Production

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Hon H. Ho, Professor, State University of New York, New Paltz, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Fathur Rachman, Indonesian Oil Palm Research Institute, Indonesia.

(2) Osama Alam, Institute of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, Zhejiang University, China.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Fathur Rachman, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Osama Alam, China) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Phenotypic Selection of Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Elite Lines for Diseases Resistance and Yield Potential

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Afroz Alam, Banasthali Vidyapith, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Asma Mahjoub, Biotechnology Center of Borj Cedria, Tunisia.

(2) Manoj Kumar Saini, Chaudhary Sarwan Kumar Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Asma Mahjoub, Tunisia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Manoj Kumar Saini, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Study on Biochemical Composition of Sea Buckthorn Fruit Cultivated from Leh, India and its Flavor Profile by Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sanjay Mishra, Professor, SR Institute of Management & Technology, Lucknow, U.P, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Bei Mariana Florica, University of Oradea, Romania.

(2) Anil B, Capital Degree and PG College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Bei Mariana Florica, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Anil B, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Dualistic Reality of Path to Progress for Indonesian Youths

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Tin-Chun Lin, Professor, School of Business and Economics, Indiana University Northwest, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Sola Olorunda, Emmanuel Alayande University of Education, Nigeria.

(2) Santosh Swarnakar, MIT ADT University, India.

(3) Hardev Singh Sokhal Jaswant Singh, Institut Latihan Perindustrian Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sola Olorunda, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Santosh Swarnakar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Hardev Singh Sokhal Jaswant Singh, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Standardization of Protocol for Production of Synthetic Seed of Brahmi (Bacopa monnieri) and Assessment of their Longevity under Differential Storage Condition

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Hon H. Ho, Professor, State University of New York, New Paltz, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Sunil Meena, BHU, India.

(2) Cinthya Christopher, All Saints’ College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Aakriti Saini, Guru Gobind Singh College Of Pharmacy, India.

(2) Avinash Shivaji Jondhale, MJM Arts Commerce and Science College Karanjali, India.

(3) Jhakeshwar Prasad, Shri Shankaracharya College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sunil Meena, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Cinthya Christopher, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Aberrant Right Subclavian Artery with Retroesophageal Course as a Reason of Dysphagia: A Case Report

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ashish Anand, GV Montgomery Veteran Affairs Medical Center, Jackson, MS, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Anastasios Goulioumis, University of Patras, School of Medicine, Greece.

(2) G. Prabavathy, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute, Sri Balaji Vidyapeeth, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Anastasios Goulioumis, Greece) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (G. Prabavathy, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Community Involvement in Participatory Forest Monitoring around Kibale National Park of Western Uganda

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinayaka K.S, Assistant Professor and Hod, Sri Venkataramana Swamy College, D.K. Karnataka, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Shourav Dutta, Rangamati Science and Technology University, Bangladesh.

(2) Jintana Unhavaithaya, Nakhon Phanom University, Thailand.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shourav Dutta, Bangladesh) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jintana Unhavaithaya, Thailand) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Effect of Phytase Enzyme in Feed on Growth Performance, Feed Utilization Efficiency, and Survival Rate of Milkfish (Chanos chanos) Fingerlings

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Golubkina Nadezhda Alexandrovna, All-Russian Institute of Vegetable Breeding and Seeds Production, Moscow region, Russia.

Reviewers:

(1) Emmanuel Ating, School of Nautical Studies, Maritime Academy of Nigeria, Nigeria.

(2) Selim Reza, Palli Karma-Sahayak Foundation, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Cecilia Nahomi Kawagoe Suda, University of Taubaté, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Emmanuel Ating, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Selim Reza, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA