Peer Review History: Evaluation of Trend Dynamics of Lentil Crop in India using Statistical Models

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ghulam Khaliq, Lasbela University of Agriculture, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) N. Gnanasankaran, Thiagarajar College, India.

(2) Anju Sharma, Dr Y S Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, India.

(3) Rajarathinam Arunachalam, Manonmaniam Sundaranar University, India.

(4) Arijit De, KPR Institute of Engineering and Technology, Affiliated to Anna University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (N. Gnanasankaran, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Anju Sharma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Rajarathinam Arunachalam, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Arijit De, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised MS v1 and Feedback v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Genetic Diversity Analysis of Grain Yield and its Attributing Traits in Different Genotypes of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Hon H. Ho, State University of New York, New Paltz, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Maria Andrea Esposito, Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Agropecuaria (INTA), Argentina.

(2) Ranju Kumari, MBAC, Agwanpur, Saharsa, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Chandramaniya Chiragkumar Pravinbhai, Anand Agricultural University (AAU), India.

(2) Rajni Devi, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Maria Andrea Esposito, Argentina) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ranju Kumari, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised MS v1 and Feedback v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Nutritional Enhancement and Organoleptic Assessment of Gluten-free and Millet-based Murukku Fortified with Chia Seeds (Salvia hispanica L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ghulam Khaliq, Lasbela University of Agriculture, Water & Marine Sciences, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Shubham Thapa, HNBGU (A Central University), India.

(2) Annalakshmi Chatterjee, University of Calcutta, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Agbaje Rafiu, Kwara State Polytechnic, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shubham Thapa, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Annalakshmi Chatterjee, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised MS v1 and Feedback v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Swine Wastewater Treatment on Fungal Population and Physicochemical Characteristics of Soil

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Anil Kumar, Devi Ahilya University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) M. Mohan, Mahendra Engineering College, India.

(2) Kshitij Dhameliya, RK University, India.

(3) Abu Imran Mallick, West Bengal State University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Denis M.K. Amara, Njala University, Sierra Leone.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.17/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (M. Mohan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kshitij Dhameliya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Abu Imran Mallick, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised MS v1 and Feedback v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Neoliberalism and Gender Justice: Examining Economic Reforms and Feminist Responses in India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Sofia Pedrosa Gomes dos Santos, University of Lisbon, Portugal.

(2) Prof. Tin-Chun Lin, Indiana University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Francis Maushe, Midlands State University, Zimbabwe.

(2) Poornima Pundhir Arora, Oriental Institute of Science & Technology, India.

(3) Yogita K S, Karnataka University Dharwad, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Eunice Fonyuy Fondze-Fombele, University of Buea, Cameroon.

(2) Gloria Ojonoka Dangana-Onuche, Prince Abubakar Audu University, Nigeria.

(3) Indra Bhaskar Mishra, University of Lucknow, India.

(4) P. Sindhuja, Alagappa University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.57/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Francis Maushe, Zimbabwe) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Poornima Pundhir Arora, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Yogita K S, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised MS v1 and Feedback v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised MS v2 and Feedback v2 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Synthesis and Spectroscopic Characterization of Manganese-Theophylline-Dicarboxylic Acid Complexes

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ahmed Mohammed Abu-Dief Mohammed, Sohag University, Egypt, Taibah University, Saudi Arabia.

Reviewers:

(1) Juan Enrique Tacoronte Morales, Technical University Of Esmeraldas, Ecuador.

(2) Atar Singh Kushwah, Women’s Biomedical Research Institute, USA.

(3) Shashwat Pandey, University of Lucknow, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) H. Sirajunisha, Bishop Heber College, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Juan Enrique Tacoronte Morales, Ecuador) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Atar Singh Kushwah, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Shashwat Pandey, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised MS v1 and Feedback v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Differential Maltosazone Crystal Formation in Selected Packaged Food Products Using the Osazone Test

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ghulam Khaliq, Lasbela University, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Tamara Premovic, “Union-Nikola Tesla” University in Belgrade, Republic of Serbia.

(2) Elbar Djenette, Algeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Kitisart Kraboun, Rajamangala University of Technology Krungthep, Thailand.

(2) Priscila Barbosa Bezerra Nunes, Federal Rural University of Pernambuco, Brasil.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Tamara Premovic, Republic of Serbia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Elbar Djenette, Algeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised MS v1 and Feedback v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Bioremediation Potentials of Poultry Manure in Crude Oil Polluted Soil

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ravi Kant Chaturvedi, Centre for Integrative Conservation, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, P.R. China.

Reviewers:

(1) Aseel Nadhim Al-Salman, University of Basrah, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iraq.

(2) Himani Chandel, Mandsaur University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Aseel Nadhim Al-Salman, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Himani Chandel, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised MS v1 and Feedback v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Role of Big Data in Enhancing Operational Efficiency

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fabricio Moraes de Almeida, Federal University of Rondonia, Brasil.

(2) Dr. Meng Ma, Anhui University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Dipak Kumar Banerjee, United States of America.

(2) Tejesh Reddy Singasani, USA.

(3) Prakash Ukhalkar, Pimpri Chinchwad College of Engineering, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Arindam Mukherjee, United States of America.

(2) Praful Nandankar, Government College Of Engineering Nagpur, India.

(3) S.DeepaLakshmi, Dwaraka Doss Goverdhan Doss Vaishnav College, India.

(4) Tarun Kumar Vashishth, IIMT University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Dipak Kumar Banerjee, United States of America) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Tejesh Reddy Singasani, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Prakash Ukhalkar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised MS v1 and Feedback v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Leveraging Data Science for Demand Forecasting and Inventory Management: A Comprehensive Review

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Fabricio Moraes de Almeida, Federal University of Rondonia, Campus de Porto Velho, Brasil.

Reviewers:

(1) Sanjib Kumar Shil, International American University, USA.

(2) Jagjot Bhardwaj, USA.

(3) Jasmin Bharadiya, University of the Cumberlands, USA.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Arindam Mukherjee, United States of America.

(2) Avik Ghosh, USA.

(3) Balusamy.N, Gobi Arts & Science College, India.

(4) Benjamin Gyedu Akonor, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Ghana.

(5) Naratip Supattananon, Rajamangala University of Technology Isan, Khonkaen Campus, Thailand.

(6) Prerna Jain, Gitarattan International Business School, India.

(7) Rita Attah, United States.

(8) Salma Akter, East West University, Bangladesh.

(9) Srinivas Kalisetty, USA.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sanjib Kumar Shil, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jagjot Bhardwaj, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Jasmin Bharadiya, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised MS v1 and Feedback v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA