Peer Review History: Organization and Implementation of a Common Space for the Promotion of Local Products in Côte d’Ivoire: The Case of the Boutique Paysanne

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Shi-Hai Dong, Professor, Superior School of Physics and Mathematics, National Polytechnic Institute, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Tefera Assefa, Ambo University, Ethiopia.

(2) K. Banupriya, Ananda College, India

(3) Mohammd Junaid Alam, Sharda School of Business Studies, Sharda University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Tefera Assefa, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (K. Banupriya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Mohammd Junaid Alam, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Effect of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in Commercial Feed on Feed Utilization Efficiency, Growth Performance, and Blood Profile of Freshwater Pomfret (Colossoma macropomum) Fingerlings

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Pedro Antonio Hernandez Cruz, Autonomous University “Benito Juarez” of Oaxaca, México.

Reviewers:

(1) Philominal Pathinathan, Andhra Pradesh Fisheries University, India.

(2) Kumar Ajay, ICAR-Central Institute of Fisheries Education, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Philominal Pathinathan, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kumar Ajay, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Declining Health Status of Young Women in India: A Cause of Concern

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ghulam Khaliq, Associate Professor, Lasbela University of Agriculture, Water & Marine Sciences, Uthal, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Mudasir Khazer, India.

(2) Nasim Mirzaei, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

(3) K. M Parveen Reddy, Navodaya Dental College and Hospital, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mudasir Khazer, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nasim Mirzaei, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (K. M Parveen Reddy, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evolution of Information Technology: A Comprehensive Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Palle E. T. Jorgensen, Professor, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.

(2) Prof. (Dr.) Sheng Zhang, Bohai University, Jinzhou, China.

Reviewers:

(1) James Olaonipekun Toyin, Auburn University, United State.

(2) Jasmin Praful Bharadiya, University of the Cumberlands, USA.

(3) Kiran Sharma Panchangam Nivarthi, USA.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.17/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (James Olaonipekun Toyin, United State) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jasmin Praful Bharadiya, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Kiran Sharma Panchangam Nivarthi, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Re-Review report_1_v1 (James Olaonipekun Toyin, United State) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Investigating the Feasibility of Xylitol and Gelatin for Controlled Release System in Drug Delivery using Calcium Alginate

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sinan Ince, University of Afyon Kocatepe, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Darsh Gautam, Gautam College of Pharmacy, India.

(2) V. T. Iswariya, CMR College of Pharmacy, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Sreenivas Pippalla, Sikkim Professional University, India.

(2) T Chandra shekar Thalluri, Assam down town University, India.

(3) Muslim Bin Aqeel, University of Central Punjab, Pakistan.

(4) T Chandra Shekar Thalluri, Assam Down Town University, India.

(5) K.Venkata Gopaiah, JNTUK Kakinada, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Darsh Gautam, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (V. T. Iswariya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessing the Knowledge Gap in Paediatric Emergency Management among Primary Healthcare Workers in Zaria, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Giuseppe Murdaca, University of Genoa, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Vani Aggarwal, SOIL School of Business Design, India.

(2) Celestine Emeka Ekwuluo, Ukraine.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ester Petrus, International University Of Management, Namibia.

(2) Niharika Tiwari, Sharda School of Nursing Science & Research, Sharda University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Vani Aggarwal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Celestine Emeka Ekwuluo, Ukraine) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of the Effects of a Neurotransmitter on the Action Potential Parameters in Lumbricus Terrestris

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sinan Ince, University of Afyon Kocatepe, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Rima Benatoui, Annaba University, Algeria.

(2) Rupanjan Roy, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rima Benatoui, Algeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rupanjan Roy, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Review on Balancing Genomic Selection Efforts for Allogamous Plant Breeding

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Hon H. Ho, Professor, State University of New York, New Paltz, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Owayes M. Hamed, University of Mosul, Iraq.

(2) Juliana Neves Barbosa, Centro Federal de EducaçãoTecnológica de Minas Gerais, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Owayes M. Hamed, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Juliana Neves Barbosa, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impact of Employment Salary Level of Graduates from Higher Education Institutions in China

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Tin-Chun Lin, Professor, School of Business and Economics, Indiana University Northwest, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Kidega Charles, Zhejiang Normal University, China.

(2) Soceline N. Batisla Ong, Iloilo State University of Fisheries Science and Technology, Philippines.

(3) Mauricio Angel, Universidad Central de Venezuela, Venezuela.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kidega Charles, China) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Soceline N. Batisla Ong, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Mauricio Angel, Venezuela) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Diagnostic Ratios and Ecological Risk of Non-carcinogenic Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (ncPAHs) in Egi Crude Oil Communities, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinayaka K.S, Assistant Professor and Hod, Sri Venkataramana Swamy College, Bantwal, D.K. Karnataka, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Neha Nidhi Tirkey, J.N. College, Ranchi University, India.

(2) K.S. Kanwal, G.B. Pant National Institute of Himalayan Environment, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) K.S. Kanwal, G.B. Pant National Institute of Himalayan Environment (NIHE), India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Neha Nidhi Tirkey, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (K.S. Kanwal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA