Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Wagih Mommtaz Ghnnam, Mansoura University Hospital, Egypt.

(2) Dr. Fabricio Moraes de Almeida, Federal University of Rondonia, Campus de Porto Velho, Brasil.

Reviewers:

(1) Murali Basa, Assam University, India.

(2) Abu Khalid Muhammad Maruf Raza, Bangladesh.

(3) Vinu Choudhary, Bisu Hospital & Fertility Centre, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ana Pereira, Polytechnic Institute of Setubal, Portugal.

(2) Csongor Kicsi , National University of Physical Education and Sport, Romania.

(3) Keerthana Santhosh, St. Mary’s College (Autonomous), India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.73/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Murali Basa, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Abu Khalid Muhammad Maruf Raza, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Vinu Choudhary, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised MS v1 and Feedback v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. John M. Polimeni, Albany College of Pharmacy & Health Sciences, New York, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Shahid Rafiq, Emerson University Multan, Pakistan.

(2) David Ebiegberi Amanawa, Nubian American Advanced College, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Aziz Ullah, Xi’an University Of Architecture & Technology, China.

(2) Debhjit Mukherjee, Chandigarh School of Business, Chandigarh Group of Colleges, India.

(3) Muh. Arifai, Wira Bhakti University, Indonesia.

(4) Satyajit Baral, The Maharaja Sayajirao University of Baroda, India.

(5) Sophie Allieu, Transit College Sierra Leone, Sierra Leone.

(6) Srijan Pateriya, Dr. C.V. Raman University, India.

(7) Stella Cheta-Maclean, Ignatius Ajuru University Of Education Nigeria, Nigeria.

(8) Swati Sisodia, GD Goenka University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shahid Rafiq, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (David Ebiegberi Amanawa, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised MS v1 and Feedback v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised MS v2 and Feedback v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rusu Teodor, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Vatsalkumar Bipinchnadra Maisuriya, University of Calgary, Canada.

(2) Alemla Imchen, Nagaland University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Vatsalkumar Bipinchnadra Maisuriya, Canada) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Alemla Imchen, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised MS v1 and Feedback v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ashish Anand, GV Montgomery Veteran Affairs Medical Center, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Vinayak Girish Galatage, Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Science, India.

(2) Jayanta Kumar Maji, Nirma University, India.

(3) Laxman S. Vijapur, BVVS Hanagal Shri Kumareshwar College of Pharmacy, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mohd Shahid, National Institute of Unani Medicine, India.

(2) Munawwar Husain Kazmi, India.

(3) Suman Manandhar, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, India.

(4) V. K. Maurya, H. N. B. Garhwal University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Vinayak Girish Galatage, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jayanta Kumar Maji, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Laxman S. Vijapur, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised MS v1 and Feedback v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ghulam Khaliq, Lasbela University of Agriculture, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Prajya Arya, Institute of Good Manufacturing Practices India (IGMPI), India.

(2) Vinay G M, Anand Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anilkumar R Chaudhari, MIDFT, India.

(2) Gayathri Sanyasi, Andhra University, India.

(3) Manal Mohammed El-Sayed Mohammed Shehata, Zagazig University, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Prajya Arya, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Vinay G M, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised MS v1 and Feedback v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sanjay Mishra, SR Institute of Management & Technology, Lucknow, U.P, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Amir Soliman, Delta University For Science And Technology, Egypt.

(2) Abraham Ngor Achiek, Texila American University, South Sudan.

(3) Cristianne Confessor Castilho Lopes, University of the Joinville Region, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Amitkumar Subhashrao Manekar, SSGMCE, SGBAU, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Amir Soliman, Egypt) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Abraham Ngor Achiek, South Sudan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Cristianne Confessor Castilho Lopes, Brazil) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised MS v1 and Feedback v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohd Saidin Misnan, Universiti Teknologi, Malaysia.

Reviewers:

(1) Aqsa Qayyum Chatha, University of Illinois, United States.

(2) Sudana Fatahillah Pasaribu, Institute Kesehatan Helvetia, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Oladapo Ajala, Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Aqsa Qayyum Chatha, United States) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sudana Fatahillah Pasaribu, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised MS v1 and Feedback v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Fawzy Ramadan Hasssanien, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, KSA.

Reviewers:

(1) Arnab Mandal, Vidyasagar University, India.

(2) Byomkesh Dash, ICAR-National Rice Research Institute, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) K. Priyatham, SKUAST-J, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Arnab Mandal, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Byomkesh Dash, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised MS v1 and Feedback v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ashish Anand, Montgomery Veteran Affairs Medical Center, Jackson, MS, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Precious Ojo Uahomo, University of Port Harcourt, Nigeria.

(2) Aftab Hussain, Riphah International University, Pakistan.

(3) Anmol Lama, Visva Bharati University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ferydoon Khamooshi, University of Zabol, Iran.

(2) Lalita Devi, Guru Nanak Dev University, India.

(3) Rahmat Pannyiwi, Defense University of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Precious Ojo Uahomo, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Aftab Hussain, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Anmol Lama, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised MS v1 and Feedback v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Tin-Chun Lin, Indiana University Northwest, USA.

(2) Dr. Abdullah Aydin, Kırşehir Ahi Evran University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Tuti Suartini, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia.

(2) Ashokkumar Baldevbhai Prajapati, Soorajba College of Education, Kadi Sarva Vishwavidyalaya-Gandhinagar, India.

(3) Ritu Sharma, University Of Jammu, India.

(4) Doris Muthoni Nthuku, Masinde Muliro University of Science and Technology Kenya, Kenya.

(5) Avitesh Vaishnavi Nayak, Sushant University, Gurugram, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anjali Patwardhan Kulkarni, India.

(2) Onyango Benard Okelo, Kisii University, Kenya.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Tuti Suartini, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ashokkumar Baldevbhai Prajapati, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ritu Sharma, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Doris Muthoni Nthuku, Kenya) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_5 (Avitesh Vaishnavi Nayak, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised MS v1 and Feedback v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised MS v2 and Feedback v2 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Revised MS v3 and Feedback v3 | File 1 | NA