Peer Review History: Constraints Faced by Buffalo Farmers and Their Influence on Livelihood Security in Agro-Climatic Zone-1B of Rajasthan

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohd Saidin Misnan, Universiti Teknologi, Malaysia.

Reviewers:

(1) Hengki Mangiring Parulian Simarmata, Politeknik Bisnis Indonesia, Indonesia.

(2) Ranjan Chatterjee, Indira Gandhi Rashtriya Manav Sangrahalaya, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Karrar Imad Abdulsahib Al-Shammari, Al-Furat Al-Awsat Technical University, Iraq.

(2) Anju Kapoor, College of Community Science, CSKHPKV, India.

(3) Divine-Love Akam, The Ohio State University,USA.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hengki Mangiring Parulian Simarmata, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ranjan Chatterjee, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Quantum Search using Grover’s Algorithm: Principles, Performance, and Applications

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sheng Zhang, Bohai University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Olisa Anthony, Cumberland University, United States of America.

(2) Reham Alghamdi, Imam Abdulrahman bin Faisal University, Saudi Arabia.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Olisa Anthony, United States of America) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Reham Alghamdi, Saudi Arabia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Novel Timomam Model for the Assessment of Water Quality of Four Rivers in Lafia-Nigeria, Using Selected Physicochemical Parameters

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Pradip K. Bhowmik, University of Nevada Las Vegas, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Rahul Ratnakar Mahamuni, Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University, India.

(2) Rev Andy Nyako Moses, Lincoln University College, Malaysia.

(3) M. S. Khirwar, R. B. S. College Agra, India.

(4) Anaga Sochi Otisi, National Biotechnology Research and Development Agency, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.72/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rahul Ratnakar Mahamuni, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rev Andy Nyako Moses, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (M. S. Khirwar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Anaga Sochi Otisi, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Phytochemical Properties and Lipid-Lowering Effects of Ethanol Extract of Pterocarpus santalinoides Leaves in Male Albino Rats

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Anil Kumar Sido-Khanu Murmu University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Mohammad Zamani Rarani, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

(2) Lamis Mohamed Nader Saad, Cairo University, Egypt.

(3) Amber Shami, Central Park Medical College, Lahore, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Christina Voycheva, Medical University of Sofia, Bulgaria.

(2) Mogborukor, Naomi Akpevwe, Nigeria.

(3) Mostafa Mourad Mohammed, Minia University, Egypt.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mohammad Zamani Rarani, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Lamis Mohamed Nader Saad, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Amber Shami, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised MS v2 and Feedback v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Strategic Management and Organisational Leadership in Cybersecurity of Deposit Money Banks in Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Valentin Marian Antohi, “Dunărea de Jos” University of Galați Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Smrita Jain, Moradabad Institute of Technology, India.

(2) Masud Rana, Pabna University of Science and Technology, Bangladesh.

(3) Hema Mirji, Institute of Management and Entrepreneurship, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Didin Hikmah Perkasa, Paramadina University, Indonesia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.43/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Smrita Jain, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Masud Rana, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Hema Mirji, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Analysis of Immune Response Mechanism of a Malaria-Autophagy & Immune Response Model

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Giuseppe Murdaca, University of Genova, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Siti Sarah Mohd Isnan, National Defence University of Malaysia, Malaysia.

(2) Julius Chicheli, Kakoma Day Secondary School, Zambia.

(3) N.P.Deepak, SNS College of Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Siti Sarah Mohd Isnan, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Julius Chicheli, Zambia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (N.P.Deepak, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Community Perceptions, Traditional uses, and Conservation Needs of Pethia manipurensis, an Endangered Endemic Fish of Loktak Lake, Manipur, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vincenzo Tufarelli, University of Bari ‘Aldo Moro’, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Wayan Kantun, Institute of Maritime Technology and Business, Indonesia.

(2) DebapriyaSarkar, Uttar BangaKrishiViswavidyalaya, India.

(3) Atul Kumar Jain, Ornamental Fisheries Training and Research Institute, India.

(4) Masoumeh Machanlou, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Satam Sachin Bajirao, Balasaheb Sawant Konkan Agricultural University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.625/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Wayan Kantun, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (DebapriyaSarkar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Atul Kumar Jain, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Masoumeh Machanlou, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Re-Review report_3_(Atul Kumar Jain, India) _v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised MS v2 and Feedback v2| File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Critical Review on Sickle Cell Disease: Pathophysiology, Clinical Burden, and Therapeutic Advances

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinayaka K.S, Sri Venkataramana Swamy College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Somali Das, KUU, India.

(2) Elteleb Gafer Elnaim Abdullah, Eldaein University, Sudan.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.625/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Somali Das, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Elteleb Gafer Elnaim Abdullah, Sudan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: An Embedded GSM-Based Panic Alert Framework for Enhancing Emergency Response in Semi-Rural Institutions

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Palle Jorgensen, University of Iowa, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Deekshitha S Nayak, Mangalore Institute of Technology & Engineering, India.

(2) S.L.Sreedevi, Anna University, India.

(3) T Bhanu Teja, Guru Nanak University, India.

(4) Amairullah Khan Lodhi, Shadan College of Engineering & Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mostafa Falah, Electrical Engineering Technical College, Middle Technical University, Iraq.

(2) R. Vajubunnisa Begum, University of Madras, India

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.38/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Deekshitha S Nayak, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (S.L.Sreedevi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (T Bhanu Teja, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Amairullah Khan Lodhi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: An Energy-Efficient 14-T Hybrid Full Adder with High-Speed Operation in a 45 nm CMOS Process

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sanjay Mishra, SR Institute of Management & Technology, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Praful Nandankar, Government College of Engineering Nagpur, India.

(2) S.Sathishkumar, Anna University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) B N Mohan Kumar, VTU, India.

(2) S.Vidyasagar, SRM Institute of Science and Techonology, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.65/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Praful Nandankar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (S.Sathishkumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA