Category Archives: Review History

Peer Review History: Role of Environmental Impact Assessment in Wildlife Conservation Outside Protected Areas in the Face of Development Interventions

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fabricio Moraes de Almeida, Federal University of Rondonia, Brasil.

Reviewers:

(1) Shiffa Ul Ain, MNS-University of Agriculture, Pakistan.

(2) Valentina Cumbo, Italy.

(3) Prosper Mensah, CSIR-Forestry Research Institute , Ghana.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Hussien O. Kadi, Sana’a University, Yemen.

(2) Christiana Nkuturum, Rivers State University, Nigeria.

(3) Melford Mbedzi, Mangosuthu University of Technology, South Africa.

(4) Mengistu Muleta, Wollega university, Ethiopia.

(5) Ranjan Chatterjee, Indira Gandhi Rashtriya Manav Sangrahalaya, India.

(6) Subrata Kumar Behera, RDS Degee Mahavidyalaya, MSCB University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shiffa Ul Ain, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Valentina Cumbo, Italy) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Prosper Mensah, Ghana) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: In Situ Ophthalmic Gels Meet Nanotechnology: Nanoparticle-Laden Smart Hydrogels for Precision Ocular Drug Delivery

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Renad Nikolaevich Alyautdin, I. M. Sechenov MSMU, Russia, University Technology MARA, Malaysia.

Reviewers:

(1) Daniel Don Nwibo, Ebonyi State University, Nigeria.

(2) Ritesh R Popat, Dr. Rajendra Gode College of Pharmacy, India.

(3) Eriska Agustin, Kader Bangsa University, Indonesia.

(4) Nannapaneni Madhavi, Jagarlamudi Kuppuswamy Choudary College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Jhakeshwar Prasad, Shri Shankaracharya College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, SSPU, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5+8+8+6=30.5/4=7.625

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Daniel Don Nwibo, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ritesh R Popat, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Eriska Agustin, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Nannapaneni Madhavi, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Effects of a BOPPPS-Integrated Treenity Blended Teaching Model on Undergraduate EFL Writing: A Quasi-Experimental Study

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Abdullah Aydin, Kırşehir Ahi Evran University, Turkey.

(2) Dr. Stan Weeber, McNeese State University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Elaf Riyadh Khalil, Baghdad University, Iraq.

(2) Montasser Mohamed Abdelwahab Mahmoud, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) P.Kousar Basha, RGMCET, JNTUA, India.

(2) Radia Bouguebs, Algeria.

(3) Yulini Rinantanti, Universitas Cenderawasih, Indonesia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Elaf Riyadh Khalil, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Montasser Mohamed Abdelwahab Mahmoud, Egypt) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Zingiberaceae and Their Traditional Uses in the Andaman and Nicobar Islands, India: A Review

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinayaka K.S, Sri Venkataramana Swamy College,  India.

Reviewers:

(1) Shaiphali Saxena, India.

(2) Aparajita Das, Swami Vivekananda Mahavidyalaya, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Afroza Sultana, Dr. Momtaz Begum University of Science and Technology, Bangladesh.

(2) C. Shobana, Vels Institute of Science, Technology and Advanced Studies, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5+8+8+6=30.5/4=7.625

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shaiphali Saxena, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Aparajita Das, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Evaluating the Required Water Governance in the Face of Compounded Crises: An Indicator Assessment Approach for the City of Bukavu, Democratic Republic of Congo

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ravi Kant Chaturvedi, Chinese Academy of Sciences,P.R. China.

Reviewers:

(1) Sivanantha J, Annamalai University, India.

(2) Mehedi Hashan Riad, Uttara University, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abdolmehdi Behroozi, University of Memphis, USA.

(2) Ajoy Kanti Das, Tripura University, India.

(3) Alhassan Abdul Latif Husein, Tamale Technical University, Ghana.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sivanantha J, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mehedi Hashan Riad, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Biotechnological Approaches to Modify Flower Color, Fragrance and Vase Life in Ornamental Plants

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Zhong-Guang Li, Yunnan Normal University, Republic of China.

Reviewers:

(1) Jalal Hameed Ali, University of Sumer, Iraq.

(2) Krishna Patel, Anand Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Satam Sachin Bajirao, Dr. Balasaheb Sawant Konkan Agricultural University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jalal Hameed Ali, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Krishna Patel, India) | File 1 |File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Next-Generation Breeding: Integrating Multi-Omics and Artificial Intelligence for Advancing Nutritional and Food Security

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinayaka K.S, Sri Venkataramana Swamy College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Prabhu k. Halakatti, RGUHS, India.

(2) Thirunahari Ugandhar, Kakatiya Govt College (A), India.

(3) Shyamrao Kulkarni, UAS, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Kotb Amer Farghali Omran, Egypt.

(2) Gurumeet C wadhawa, Mumbai University, India.

(3) Aditya Nugraha, Marine and Fisheries Polytechnic of Kupang, Indonesia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.625/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Prabhu k. Halakatti, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Thirunahari Ugandhar,  India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Shyamrao Kulkarni,  India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Anorectoplasty for Anorectal Malformations: Surgical Outcomes, Predictive Factors for Continence and Quality of Life

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Giuseppe Murdaca, University of Genoa, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Surya Teja Nakka, Rajeev Gandhi University of Health Sciences, India.

(2) Dinesh Selvam S, Amity University Haryana, India.

(3) Godsent Ayodele, Edo State College of Nursing Sciences, Nigeria.

(4) Rasika Bhide, USA.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Alegra Rifani Masharto, North Sumatra University, Indonesia.

(2) Chinenyenwa Precious Israel, Georgia State University, United States of America.

(3) K.Gangatharan, Vinayaka Mission’s College of Physiotherapy, India.

(4) Linda Varghese, Amala College of Nursing, India.

(5) Mohamed Belomaria, Ibn Tofail University, Morocco.

(6) Sanat Mahendra Dhoke, Parul Institute of Pharmacy & Research, Parul University, India.

(7) Suhaskumar Patel, USA.

(8) Udaya Kumari Tula, USA.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.625/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Surya Teja Nakka, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Dinesh Selvam S, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Godsent Ayodele, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Rasika Bhide, USA) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: The Influence of Quality of Work Life, Organizational Commitment, and Intellectual Intelligence on Employee Performance at the East Medan Primary Tax Service Office

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fabian Moodley, North-West University, South Africa.

Reviewers:

(1) Ahmad Fathulla Ahmad, Erbil Polytechnic University, Iraq.

(2) Usha Narayan , Christ University, India.

(3) Deus N. Shatta, National Institute of Transport, Tanzania.

(4) Namrata Gain, Rungta International Skills University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Idris Yusuf Isah, Ahmadu Bello University Zaria, Nigeria.

(2) Mustafa Göktuğ Kaya, Turkey.

(3) Rajalaxmi  Mishra, Odisha University Of Health Sciences or College of Nursing, India.

(4) Tara Prasad Padhy, S M Institute of Technology, P.G. Centre for Management Studies, BPUT, India.

(5) Venkatesh Babu T S, Swamy Vivekananda Rural First Grade College, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.92/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ahmad Fathulla Ahmad, Iraq) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Usha Narayan, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Deus N. Shatta, Tanzania) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Namrata Gain, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Influence of Biofertilisers on Mulberry Productivity: A Review

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vincenzo Tufarelli, University of Bari ‘Aldo Moro’, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Osuji-Kalu, Nnenna Chinenyenwa , Federal University of Technology, Nigeria.

(2) Pooja Borah, Assam Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5+8+8+6=30.5/4=7.625

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Osuji-Kalu, Nnenna Chinenyenwa, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Pooja Borah, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA