Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinayaka K.S, Sri Venkataramana Swamy College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) D. Rambabu, IARI New Delhi, India.

(2) Atul Kumar Pachauri, Sanjeev Agrawal Global Educational University , India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (D. Rambabu, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Atul Kumar Pachauri, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinayaka K.S, Sri Venkataramana Swamy College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Mahendar Singh Bhinda, ICAR- Vivekananda Parvatiya Krishi Anusandhan, India.

(2) Arvind Kumar, AISECT University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Sheela Mary, ICAR-Sugarcane Breeding Institute, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mahendar Singh Bhinda, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Arvind Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jichao Sun , China University of Geosciences, Beijing, China.

Reviewers:

(1) V. Magendira Mani, Marudhar Kesari Jain College for Women , India.

(2) Kapil Kumar Yadav, Chandra Shekhar Azad University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Dilip Kumar Verma, ICAR-IARI RS Indore, India.

(2) Murugaragavan Ramasamy, Agricultural College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (V. Magendira Mani, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kapil Kumar Yadav, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ioannis A. Makedos, University of Macedonia, Greece.

(2) Dr. Nimet Keser, Çukurova University, Adana, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) B.R.Kumar, Andhra Loyola College, India.

(2) Juanda, Universitas Negeri Makassar, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (B.R. Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Juanda, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Abdel-Raheem Ali Abdel-Raheem, National Research Centre, Egypt.

(2) Prof. Ahmed Awad Talb Altalb, University of Mosul, Iraq.

(3) Dr. Vincenzo Tufarelli, University of Bari ‘Aldo Moro’, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Vasileios Malasidis, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece.

(2) Harsh R Patel, Kamdhenu University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Vasileios Malasidis, Greece) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Harsh R Patel, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Journal change | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Palle E. T. Jorgensen, The University of Iowa, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Aram Ahmad Mohammed , University of Sulaimani, Iraq.

(2) Hassoon N. Al-masoudy, University of Kerbala, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Divya Gupta, Dr. G.C. College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, CSKHPKV, India.

(2) Rajesh Ranjan, C.V.Sc. & A.H., Rewa (NDVSU), India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.15/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Aram Ahmad Mohammed, Iraq) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Hassoon N. Al-masoudy, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Jean-Paul Ngbolua Koto-Te-Nyiwa, University of Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo.

Reviewers:

(1) Quratulann Sattar , University of Agriculture Faisalabad , Pakistan.

(2) R. Abdul Vahith, Jamal Mohamed College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Quratulann Sattar, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (R. Abdul Vahith, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Golubkina Nadezhda Alexandrovna,Russian Institute of Vegetable Breeding And Seeds Production, Moscow region, Russia.

Reviewers:

(1) Bhavya Karumanchi, RMIT University, Australia.

(2) Peymaneh Ghasemi Afshar, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

(3) Pallavi Nagorao Somthane, SNBP College of Pharmacy, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Bhavya Karumanchi, Australia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Peymaneh Ghasemi Afshar, Iran) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Pallavi Nagorao Somthane, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Re-Review report_1_v1 (Bhavya Karumanchi, Australia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Re-Review report_2_v1 (Peymaneh Ghasemi Afshar, Iran) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised MS v3 and Feedback v3 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Hon H. Ho, State University of New York, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Alok Gupta, India.

(2) Salah Hadjout, Algeria.

(3) DEGUI Nouara, Blida 1 University, Algeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Alok Gupta, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Salah Hadjout, Algeria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (DEGUI Nouara, Algeria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. S. Prabhu, Sri Venkateswara College of Engineering, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Hasim Kamal Mallick, University of Calcutta, India.

(2) Ravi Ranjan Kumar, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Kapil Kumar Yadav, Chandra Shekhar Azad University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

(2) Kumari Rajani, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

(3) Lenin Kanagasabai, India.

(4) Taras Pasternak, Spain.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hasim Kamal Mallick, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ravi Ranjan Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA