Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sinan Ince, University of Afyon Kocatepe, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Pooja Singh, Shri Shankaracharya Institute of Medical Sciences Bhilai, India.

(2) Stuuti Verma, India.

(3) Júlia Guimarães Mendes Alves, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Brasil.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Naresh Sen, Rama Univerity, India.

(2) Priyanka Mayapur, AITD, IGNOU, Goa University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.93/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Pooja Singh, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Stuuti Verma, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Júlia Guimarães Mendes Alves, Brasil) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Golubkina Nadezhda Alexandrovna,All-Russian Institute of Vegetable Breeding And Seeds Production,Russia.

Reviewers:

(1) Sunita Jain, Bhupal Nobles’ University, Udaipur , India.

(2) Manoharan Karuppiah Pillai, University of Swaziland , Kingdom of Swaziland.

(3) R. Vinoth, Swamy Vivekanandha College of Pharmacy, India.

Additional Reviewers:.

(1) Dwi Pratiwi Kasmara, Senior Medan University, Indonesia.

(2) Arshia Parveen, Swami Ramanand Teerth Marathwada University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sunita Jain, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Manoharan Karuppiah Pillai, Kingdom of Swaziland) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (R. Vinoth, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised MS v2 and Feedback v2 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Giuseppe Murdaca, University of Genoa, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Namrata Makkar, AIIMS, India.

(2) Nsikan S. Udoekong, Akwa Ibom State Polytechnic, Nigeria.

(3) Taha Shabbir, Hamdard University, Pakistan.

(4) Paricharak Sukanya Pramod, Anekant Education Society’s College of Pharmacy, India.

(5) Jyotsna Pandit Khedkar, NES’s Gangamai College of Pharmacy, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abu Naser Ibne Sattar, Bangladesh Medical University, Bangladesh.

(2) Amr M.K. Mahrous, El Saleheya El Gadida University, Egypt.

(3) Deepak Kajla, Gurugram Global College of Pharmacy, India.

(4) Hala Saad Bash, College of Pharmacy, Iraq.

(5) Manjunath GN, Sri Siddhartha Medical College, India.

(6) Sushant M. Ahire, Divine College of Pharmacy, Satana, India.

(7) Zainab Nazar Hasan Anber, Baghdad College of Medical Sciences, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.625/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Namrata Makkar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nsikan S. Udoekong, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Taha Shabbir, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Paricharak Sukanya Pramod, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_5 (Jyotsna Pandit Khedkar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vincenzo Tufarelli, University of Bari ‘Aldo Moro’, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Omar Hetzael López Almonte, Tecnológico de Estudios Superiores de Chalco, México.

(2) Atanu Mitra, Tarakali Vidyapith, India.

(3) BADANARO Fègbawè, University of Lomé, Togo.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Dilip Kumar Mondol, University of Rajshahi, Bangladesh.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Omar Hetzael López Almonte, México) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Atanu Mitra, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (BADANARO Fègbawè, Togo) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Golubkina Nadezhda Alexandrovna, All-Russian Institute of Vegetable Breeding And Seeds Production, Russia.

(2) Prof. Hudson Nyambaka, Kenyatta University, Kenya.

Reviewers:

(1) K SGour, RTMNU, India.

(2) Syed Muhammad Umer Gilani, University of Karachi , Pakistan.

(3) Nurul Amira Binti Buslima, Universiti Malaysia Kelantan, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) C.l. Avadhani, Annamalai University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (K SGour, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Syed Muhammad Umer Gilani, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Nurul Amira Binti Buslima, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised MS v2 and Feedback v2 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised MS v3 and Feedback v3 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v3 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinayaka K.S, Sri Venkataramana Swamy College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Karniriius Harefa, Institut Kesehatan Medistra Lubuk Pakam, Indonesia.

(2) Bin Zhao, The Affiliated Hospital of Jiangxi University of Chinese Medicine, China.

(3) Weerachai Pipatrattanaseree, Thailand.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Wasan Kadhim A. Altemimi, University of Basra, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Karniriius Harefa, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Bin Zhao, China) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Weerachai Pipatrattanaseree, Thailand) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Giuseppe Murdaca, University of Genoa, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Khuspe Pankaj Ramdas, Shriram Shikshan Sanstha’s College of Pharmacy, India.

(2) Murtadha Kareem Najim, Al-Furat Al-Awsat Technical University, Iraq.

(3) Gudepu Renuka, Pingle Govt College for Women , India.

(4) Nirlep Patel, USA.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Khuspe Pankaj Ramda, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Murtadha Kareem Najim, Iraq) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Gudepu Renuka, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Nirlep Patel, USA) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Giuseppe Murdaca, University of Genova, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) P B Praveen Kumar, Dhanalakshmi Srinivasan Medical College and Hospital, , India.

(2) Lara Moussa , London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine , United Kingdom.

(3) Sanusi Rahama Karama, Noida International University , India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (P B Praveen Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Lara Moussa, United Kingdom) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sanusi Rahama Karama, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Re-Review report_1_v1 (P B Praveen Kumar, India)| File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Re-Review report_2_v1 (Lara Moussa, United Kingdom)| File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ahmed Mohamed Mohamed Abdelraheem Ibrahim Elkordy, Sohag University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Munifa Jabeen, Government College University of Faisalabad, Pakistan.

(2) Pragya Kulkarni, Govt. V.Y.T. PG Autonomous College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Munifa Jabeen, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Pragya Kulkarni, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Hon H. Ho, State University of New York, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Gadha Sreekumar, Krishi Vidyan Kendra, India.

(2) Ashish Kumar, Rajasthan College of Agriculture, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Dilip Kumar Verma, ICAR-IARI RS Indore, India.

(2) Farshid Talat, AREEO, Iran.

(3) Gangadhara Doggalli, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad, India.

(4) Muhammad Raza, Korea National University of Transportation, South Korea.

(5) Tapas Ranjan Das, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Gadha Sreekumar, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ashish Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA