Peer Review History: Effect of Foliar Application of Glycine Betaine on Immature Tea (Camellia sinensis (L.) Plants during Drought

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rusu Teodor, Department of Technical and Soil Sciences, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Sandeep Bhardwaj, CCS Haryana Agricultural University Hisar-125004, India.

(2) Ali Hussein Jasim, Field Crop Department Al-Qasim Green University, Iraq.

(3) Andres Maria-Ramirez, CETMAYS El Colegio De Tlaxcala A.C., Mexico.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5+8+8+6=30.5/4=7.625

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sandeep Bhardwaj, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ali Hussein Jasi, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Andres Maria-Ramirez, Mexico) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Journal change from AJOPSS TO JOGAE | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Current Trends and Future Perspectives in Treatment Strategies for Dye-Containing Textile Wastewater

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ahmed Mohammed Abu-Dief, Sohag University, Egypt, Taibah University, Saudi Arabia.

Reviewers:

(1) M. B. Jessie Raj, Bishop Heber College, India.

(2) Randa M. Osman, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Akbar Mohammadidoust, Islamic azad university, Iran.

(2) CHERGUI Yamina, Ahme Draia Adrar Algeria, Algeria.

(3) Daniel O. Udorah, Federal Polytechnic Oko, Nigeria.

(4) Divyanshi Sharma, AKTU, India.

(5) Farah Binte Shahid Urbi, Islamic University of Technology (IUT), Bangladesh.

(6) Ganjar Samudro, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia.

(7) Iqtiar Md Siddique, The University of Texas at El Paso, USA.

(8) Sudarshan.P, SDM College Ujire, Mangalore University, India.

(9) Thipsuree Kornboonraksa, Burapha University, Thailand.

(10) Vandita Srivastava, Kanahiya Lal D.A.V. (P.G.) College, India.

(11) Veronika Zhukova, National Technical University of Ukraine ‘Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute’, Ukraine.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (M. B. Jessie Raj, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Randa M. Osman, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Optimization of Fertilizer Use Efficiency in Bhendi under Drip Fertigation

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vincenzo Tufarelli, DETO – Section of Veterinary Science and Animal Production, University of Bari ‘Aldo Moro’, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) R. Jebakumar, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, India.

(2) Hussain T. Tahir, Kirkuk University- College of Agriculture, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mazin Hasan Raheema, University of Baghdad, Laser Institute for Postgraduate Studies, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (R. Jebakumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Hussain T. Tahir, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Performance Evaluation of Mini-tractor operated Zero-till Planter for NEH Region

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jichao Sun, China University of Geosciences, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Ali Abdulqader Mohammed Ali Al-Zaidi, Al-Qasim Green University, Iraq.

(2) Prem Kumar Sundaram, ICAR Research Complex for Eastern Region, India.

(3) Reenu Singh, United States of America.

(4) Visakhonuo Kuotsu, Nagaland University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Pramod Prabhakar, BAU, India.

(2) Silindza Thandokuhle Knowledge, University of Eswatini, Eswatini.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.625/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ali Abdulqader Mohammed Ali Al-Zaidi, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Prem Kumar Sundaram, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Reenu Singh, United States of America) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Visakhonuo Kuotsu, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Tahsil-wise Assessment of Broiler and Layer Poultry Production in Ahilyanagar District, Maharashtra, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jurislav Babic, University of Osijek, Croatia.

Reviewers:

(1) Rimmi Datta, University of Kalyani, India.

(2) K Pushpa, India.

(3) Rajesh Sudhakar Wakchaure, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mukesh Kumar Chourase, Makhanlal Chaturvedi National University of Journalism and Communication, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rimmi Datta, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (K Pushpa, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Rajesh Sudhakar Wakchaure, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Comparative Assessment of Digital Banking Quality and Satisfaction among Rural Users of Private and Public Sector Banks

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Sanjay Mishra, SR Institute of Management & Technology, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Dinda Fatmah, Indonesia.

(2) Sawssen Hajji Dhahri, Gafsa University, Tunisia.

(3) Jomon Jose M., Sahrdaya Institute of Management Studies Thrissur, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Geeta Devi, Maharaja Agrasen University, India.

(2) Mirhamida Rahmah, Al-Anwar School of Economics, Indonesia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.03/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Dinda Fatmah, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sawssen Hajji Dhahri, Tunisia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Jomon Jose M., India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Enzymatic Biomarker Responses of Channa punctata to Industrial Effluent Contamination in Freshwater River Ecosystems: A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinayaka K.S, Sri Venkataramana Swamy College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Aminah, Ahmad Yani University, Indonesia.

(2) Sajida Frhan Hussain, Iraq.

(3) Neha Sanwal, College of Fisheries, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Marwah Hashem Dawood, University of Mosul, Iraq.

(2) Najeh Alali, Al-Ayen Iraqi University, Iraq.

(3) Sajida Frhan Hussain, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Aminah, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sajida Frhan Hussain, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Neha Sanwal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: An Investigate Study on the Risk Factors of Breast Cancer in Oran, Algeria

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Renad Nikolaevich Alyautdin, I. M. Sechenov MSMU, Russia and University Technology MARA, Malaysia.

Reviewers:

(1) Saeid Zibaee,Razi Vaccine and Serum Research Institute, Iran.

(2) Navdeep Johar, UK.

(3) S. Vijaya Peterraj, University of Madras, India.

(4) Rafal Al-Rawi, Hawler Medical University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ashrafoalsadat  Shekarbaghani, Research Institute of Education studies(rie) Organization for Educational Research and  Planning(OERP), Iran.

(2) Zulaika binti Abdullah, Universiti Malaysia Perlis, Malaysia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.37/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Saeid Zibaee, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Navdeep Johar, UK) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (S. Vijaya Peterraj, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Rafal Al-Rawi, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Digital vs. Physical: How Technology is Redefining the Retail Landscape

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ioannis A. Makedos, University of Macedonia, Greece.

Reviewers:

(1) Anu Bala, Government College for Women, Gandhi Nagar, India.

(2) Dip Bharatbhai Patel, University of North America, USA.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) K.Rajam, Srimad Andavan Arts and Science College(Autonomous), Affiliated to Bharathidasan University, India.

(2) Kiran Bangarwa, Panipat Institute of Engeeinering and Technology, India.

(3) Laxhmi Narayan Das, India.

(4) Suresh Reddy Jakka, Mahatma Gandhi University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Anu Bala, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Dip Bharatbhai Patel, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Quality Control and Troubleshooting in Histopathology Laboratories

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Sanjay Mishra, SR Institute of Management & Technology, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Prabhakar Kumar, Lovely Professional University, India.

(2) Padmaja Jagati, Shailabala Women’s Autonomous College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abdul M Ukratalo, Indonesia.

(2) F. Janeeta Priya, PG & Research Department of Chemistry, Holy Cross College (Autonomous), Tiruchirappalli, India.

(3) Mariana Paz Calderón Nieto, Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, México.

(4) Muzaffar Syah Mallow, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia (Usim), Malaysia.

(5) Nigam Jyoti Maiti, Imt Pharmacy College, India.

(6) Sana Naushad, Magadh University, India.

(7) Tarique Mahmood, Magadh University, India.

(8) Tejeshwini Patil, Raichur institute of medical sciences, India.

(9) Wassan Mhammed Husain, Medical College, Ibn Sina University of Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Prabhakar Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Padmaja Jagati, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA