Category Archives: Review History

Peer Review History: Effect of Panchagavya on Physical and Nutritive Value of Hydroponic Fodder Maize

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinayaka K.S, Sri Venkataramana Swamy College, Karnataka, India.

Reviewers:

(1) E. Thippeswamy, Mangalore University, India.

(2) Marwan Reddy Chinnam, Vivekananda Global University, India.

(3) Shubhashri Kumari, OP Jindal University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (E. Thippeswamy, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Marwan Reddy Chinnam, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Shubhashri Kumari, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Dosage Optimization of Methionine and Moringa oleifera Leaf Extract for In ovo Feeding in Japanese Quails

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinayaka K.S,Sri Venkataramana Swamy College, Karnataka, India.

Reviewers:

(1) A.K. Srivastava, India.

(2) Sadiq Haladu, Federal Polytechnic Ede, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Shahbaa Muslem Ismail, Middle Technical University, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (A.K. Srivastava, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sadiq Haladu, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Structure of Labour Market in Coir Spinning and its Implications for Workers’ Welfare: Evidence from Kerala

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. John M. Polimeni, Albany College of Pharmacy & Health Sciences, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Abhiraj Malia, Kalinga Institute of Social Sciences, Deemed to be University, India.

(2) B.R.Kumar, Andhra Loyola College, India.

(3) Vasudha Kurikala, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Jagadish Tulimelli, Vignan Deemed to be University, India.

(2) Rukmini M, Maharajah’s College (Autonomous), India.

(3) Sphurti Birajdar, Dnyaan Prasad Global University’s School of Maangement & Research, India.

(4) Zhao Changyi, Tomsk State University, Russian Federation.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Abhiraj Malia, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (B.R.Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Vasudha Kurikala, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Assessment of Indoor and Outdoor Particulate Matter Concentrations in Air at Some Secondary Schools in Port Harcourt Local Government Area Rivers State, Nigeria

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Pradip K. Bhowmik, University of Nevada Las Vegas, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Itohan Iyobhebhe, Mountain Top University, Nigeria.

(2) Yasir Khaleel Almusawi, Al-Nahrain University , Iraq.

(3) T Bhanu Teja, Guru Nanak University , India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.93/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Itohan Iyobhebhe, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Yasir Khaleel Almusawi, Iraq) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (T Bhanu Teja, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: An Integrated Analysis of Physiological Alterations in Moth Bean in Response to Pre and Post Emergence Herbicides

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sanjay Mishra, SR Institute of Management & Technology, Lucknow, U.P, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Muzamil Yousuf, India.

(2) Niharika Bharti, B. R. Ambedkar Bihar University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Muzamil Yousuf, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Niharika Bharti, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Assessment of Genetic Diversity and Farmers Associated Indigenous Knowledge of Enset (Ensete ventricosum (Welw.) Cheesman) Landraces in the Keffa Zone, Ethiopia

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinayaka K.S, Sri Venkataramana Swamy College, Karnataka, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Derviş ÖZTÜRK, Turkey.

(2) Sami Awad Alkubiasy, University of Anbar, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Derviş ÖZTÜRK, Turkey) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sami Awad Alkubiasy, Iraq) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Integrative Ethnobotanical and GC–MS Analysis of Valeriana jatamansi Jones: Pharmacological Potential and Conservation Importance

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Hon H. Ho, State University of New York, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Kurniawan Arif Maspul, Al-Madinah International University, Malaysia.

(2) Talip Şahin, Adıyaman University, Türkiye.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) K. Jagadeesh, St. Johns college of Pharmaceutical Sciences, India.

(2) Umesh Kumar, Swami Vivekanand Subharti University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kurniawan Arif Maspul, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Talip Şahin, Türkiye) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: The Strategic Roles of Technology Orientation, Digital Capability and Economic Orientation in Fostering Innovation Performance Via Sustainable Product Design

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. John M. Polimeni, Albany College of Pharmacy & Health Sciences, New York, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Jaypee O. Bathan, JOBQEHS Management Consultancy Service, Philippines.

(2) Qaisar Abbas Fatimi, New Zealand.

(3) Helin G Yudawisastra, University of Muhammadiyah Bandung, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jaypee O. Bathan, Philippines) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Qaisar Abbas Fatimi, New Zealand) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Helin G Yudawisastra, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: In Vitro Antibacterial Activity of Psidium guajava Leaf Extracts against Clinical Isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Saravana Kumari, Rathnavel Subramaniam College of Arts and Science, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Ahmed Ali Kadhim Al-Salhi, University of Thi-Qar, Iraq.

(2) Luay Ali Khaleel, Al-Qadisiyah University, Iraq.

(3) Najah Ali Mohammed, Midle Technical University , Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Adarsh Kumar Pathak, ASPC Jaunpur, India.

(2) Herliati Rahman, Jayabaya University, Indonesia.

(3) Madhu gudipati, Gate College of Pharmacy, Golanthara, India.

(4) Mohammad Nasar, KalojiRao University of Health Science, India.

(5) Obika Ogochukwu Immaculate, University of Lincoln, United Kingdom.

(6) Onache Petronela Anca, National Research – Development Institute For Biotechnology In Horticulture Ștefănești-Argeș, Romania.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ahmed Ali Kadhim Al-Salhi, Iraq) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Luay Ali Khaleel, Iraq) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Najah Ali Mohammed, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Elaeocarpus ganitrus (Rudraksha): A treasure trove for novel medicinal world

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Chung-Jen Chiang, China Medical University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Taleb Hossain Roman, International Islamic University of Chittagong, Bangladesh.

(2) Heronima d. Sanchez, Benguet State University- Bokod Campus, Philippines.

(3) S. Peer Mohamed , Sadakathullah Appa College, India.

(4) Makhabbah Jamilatun, Health Polytechnic of Health Ministry Surakarta, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Pragyandip Parthasarathi Dash, Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Parul University, India.

(2) S. Peer Mohamed, Sadakathullah Appa College, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Taleb Hossain Roman, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Heronima d. Sanchez, Philippines) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (S. Peer Mohamed, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Makhabbah Jamilatun, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA