Peer Review History: Poverty Alleviation Strategies in India: A Comparative Analysis of the Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI) and Human Development Index (HDI)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohd Saidin Misnan, Universiti Teknologi, Malaysia.

Reviewers:

(1) Glorina C. Damong, Benguet State University, Philippines.

(2) Saddam Mohammad Ali Alkhawaldeh, World Islamic Sciences& Education University, Jordan.

(3) Isaac Esezobor Ogbeifun, Mudiame University, Nigeria.

(4) Hemanta Kumar Bhadra, University of Rajshahi, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Gilbert Rely, Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya University, Indonesia,  Indonesia.

(1) Jinyue Wang, Australian Institute of Interpreters and Translators Inc, China.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Glorina C. Damong, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Saddam Mohammad Ali Alkhawaldeh, Jordan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Isaac Esezobor Ogbeifun, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Hemanta Kumar Bhadra, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Micro Economics and Carbon Footprint of Mechanised Gill Netters and Trawl Netters of West Bengal, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sanjay Mishra, SR Institute of Management & Technology, Lucknow, U.P, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Wayan Kantun, Balik Diwa Institute of Maritime Technology and Business, Indonesia.

(2) Paramesh Godishala, Government Degree College, Rangasaipet, India.

(3) Fawad Ali, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mohammad Hannan Mia, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM) & University of Windsor (UWindsor), Malaysia.

(2) Mulyono S. Baskoro, IPB University, Indonesia .

(3) Naglaa Elsaid Ahmed Shaban, Agricultural Research Centre, Agricultural Economics Research Institute, Egypt.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Wayan Kantun, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Paramesh Godishala, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Fawad Ali, China) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparative Phytochemical Profiling and GC-MS Analysis of Bioactive Constituents in Triumfettatomentosa and T. rhomboidei

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jichao Sun, China University of Geosciences, China.

Reviewers: 

(1) Sunita, Pt. BD Sharma University Health Sciences, India.

(2) Pongsathorn Tongkasee, Rajamangala University of Technology Isan  Sakon Nakhon, Thailand.

(3) Zoubeida Souiy, University of Monastir, Tunisia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Susan Kurian, Mar Ivanios College (Autonomous), India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sunita, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Pongsathorn Tongkasee, Thailand) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Zoubeida Souiy, Tunisia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: GC-MS characterization, antioxidant activities and in silico docking studies of essential oil components of Commiphora kerstingii leaves

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Anil Kumar, Sido-Khanu Murmu University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Luay Ali Khaleel, University of Al-Qadisiyah , Iraq.

(2) V. Vetrivelan, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Aderonke Elizabeth Fakayode, Augusta University, United States of America.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.55/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Luay Ali Khaleel, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (V. Vetrivelan, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Yield and Economic Evaluation of Tomato Hybrids through Front Line Demonstrations in Krishna District, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinayaka K.S, Sri Venkataramana Swamy College,  Karnataka, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Ratna Dewi Eskundari, Universitas Veteran Bangun Nusantara, Indonesia.

(2) Radka Bozhinova, Tobacco and Tobacco Products Institute, Bulgaria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Amarsinh B. Landage, Government College of Engineering Ratnagiri, India.

(2) J.P.Mishra, Aryavrat University, India.

(3) Kou Hayakawa, Japan.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ratna Dewi Eskundari, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Radka Bozhinova, Bulgaria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Exploring Grain Trait Diversity and Yield Stability in Bread Wheat through Multi Environment Evaluation and Multivariate Statistical Tools

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinayaka K.S , Sri Venkataramana Swamy College, Karnataka, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Najlaa Tariq Hassn, University of Mosul, Iraq.

(2) Florin Sala, University of Life Sciences “King Mihai I” from Timisoara, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.2/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Najlaa Tariq Hassn, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Florin Sala, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparative Evaluation of Wheat Varieties Across Different Locations for Growth, Productivity and Economic Viability in Eastern Uttar Pradesh, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Hon H. Ho, Department of  Biology, State University of New York, New Paltz,  USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Indrani Nath, Forest College and Research Institute, Mettupalayam 641 301, India.

(2) Pritha Ghosh, ST Pious X Degree and PG College for Women (Autonomous), India.

(3) Mohammad Shahidul Islam, Bangladesh Agricultural University(BAU), Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ashish Lambat, Sevadal Mahila Mahavadyalaya and Research Academy, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Indrani Nath, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Pritha Ghosh, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Mohammad Shahidul Islam, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Climate Change and Soil Health: A Review of Adaptation and Mitigation Practices

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Anil Kumar, Devi Ahilya University, Khandwa Road, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Parth Desai, Gujarat University, India.

(2) Yurii Dehtiarov, State Biotechnological University, Ukraine.

(3) Priyanka Sinha, Bundelkhand University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Amanpreet Tangri, Chandigarh University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Parth Desai, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Yurii Dehtiarov, Ukraine) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Priyanka Sinha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of Genetic Variability and Path Analysis for Early Seedling Vigour Traits in Rice (Oryza sativa L.) under Laboratory and Dry Direct-Seeded Conditions

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Al-Quds Open University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Avneet Kaur, GGDSD College, India.

(2) Manoj Kumar Lal Das, Tribhuwan University, Nepal.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Noor Abdulameer Oudah, University of Kerbala, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Avneet Kaur, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Manoj Kumar Lal Das, Nepal) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Examination of Physicochemical, Microbial, Pharmacological and I.R. Studies of Ni(II) Lomustine Complex

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Anil Kumar, Devi Ahilya University, Khandwa Road, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Amitesh Chakraborty, Guru Nanak Institute of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, India.

(2) Rajesh Kumar, Ranchi University, India.

(3) Satyesh Raj Anand, Jagannath University Jaipur Rajasthan, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Amitesh Chakraborty, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rajesh Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Satyesh Raj Anand, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Re-Review Report_1 (Amitesh Chakraborty, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Re-Review Report_3 (Satyesh Raj Anand, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised MS v2 and Feedback v2 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Re-Review Report_v2 (Rajesh Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA