Peer Review History: Evaluation of Rhizobacteria and Siderophores-Producing Bacteria from Roots of Selected Leguminous Crops

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Anil Kumar, Devi Ahilya University, Khandwa Road, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Wael Fahmi Abdulrahman Alshamary, Kirkuk University, Iraq.

(2) Ummi Hiras Habisukan, Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah Palembang, Indonesia.

(3) Rukuosietuo Kuotsu, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.63/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Wael Fahmi Abdulrahman Alshamary, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ummi Hiras Habisukan, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Rukuosietuo Kuotsu, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Nutritional and anti-nutritional properties of mulberry genotypes for its leaf quality- Evaluation of their potential as an animal feed

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ozdal Gokdal, Adnan Menderes University, Çine Vocational School, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Khalid Chillab Kridie Al-Salhie, University of Basrah, Iraq.

(2) Hossam Khaled Saad El-Deen, Animal Production Research Institute, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Khalid Chillab Kridie Al-Salhie, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Hossam Khaled Saad El-Deen, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised MS v2 and Feedback v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Soil Characteristics Limiting Cocoa Yields in Azaguié, Southern Côte d’Ivoire: Implications for Production Improvement

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Al-Quds Open University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) C. Sivaranjani, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

(2) Sumaira Mir, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin (Malaysia), Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Deepika Tandon, PGIMER, India.

(2) M.ManimaranImayam, Institute of Agriculture and Technology, India.

(3) Nihad A.Abbas, University of Al-Qadisiyah, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (C. Sivaranjani, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sumaira Mir, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Prevalence and Economic Implications of Foetal Wastage in Small Ruminants (Sheep and Goats) Slaughtered at Jalingo Abattoir, Taraba State, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rusu Teodor, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Begna Bulcha Guta, Wollega University, Ethiopia.

(2) Bagyalakshmi Jarsangi, NTR College of Veterinary Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Durga Chourasia, College of Veterinary Science and A.H, India.

(2) Kenth Joshua B. Espina, Iloilo State University of Fisheries Science and Technology, Philippines.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Begna Bulcha Guta, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Bagyalakshmi Jarsangi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Spatial Design Responses to Urban Drought: Climate-Adaptive Xeriscape Strategies in Istanbul

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ravi Kant Chaturvedi, Chinese Academy of Sciences,P.R. China.

Reviewers:

(1) Abdul Jalil, University of Peshawar, Pakistan.

(2) Nuray ERAN TÜREDİ, Ministry of National Education, Türkiye.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Seethiya Mahajan, Khalsa University, India.

(2) Shubham Kumar Yadav, Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidyalaya (IGKV), India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Abdul Jalil, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nuray ERAN TÜREDİ, Türkiye) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Bacterial Contamination of Fresh Fluted Pumpkin Leaves (Ugu) Sold in Abakaliki, Ebonyi State, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Cristina-Crenguta Albu, Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) C. Mabel Joshaline, Arul Anandar College, India.

(2) Jagadeesh. U, India.

(3) Tri I. Wirjantoro, Chiang Mai University, Thailand.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (C. Mabel Joshaline, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jagadeesh. U, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Tri I. Wirjantoro, Thailand) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Successful Management of Acute Glufosinate Ammonium (Herbicide) Toxicity in a Non-descriptive Dog

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Yi-Ren Hong, Kaohsiung Medical University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Afyaa Al-Hamdany, Kufa University, Iraq.

(2) Iheanacho Ulumma Joan, Nigeria.

(3) Abrar Ul Haq, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ahmad Dahlan, Poltekkes Kemenkes Jambi, Indonesia.

(2) Lorenzo Martini D’Agostino di Ser Jacopo, Italien.

(3) Reza Faraji, Ilam University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

(4) Samira Malekzadeh Shiravani, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Afyaa Al-Hamdany, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Iheanacho Ulumma Joan, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Abrar Ul Haq, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised MS v2 and Feedback v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Congenital Goitre in a Neonatal Goat (Kid) Associated with Iodine Deficiency: A Case Report

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Anil Kumar, Sahibganj College, Sido-Khanu Murmu University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Umair Ahmad, The University of agriculture Peshawar Pakistan, Pakistan.

(2) Osama Hefny Abdelshaffy Mahmoud Matloup, National Research Centre, Egypt.

(3) Mehroz Latif, University of Agriculture, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Dipak Kumar Sarma, Assam Agricultural University, India.

(2) Mohammed kadhim wali, Al-Qasim Green University , Iraq.

(3) Murtadha Ali Saleh Harz AL-Bakhati, Iraq.

(4) S. Saravanan, Veterinary College and Research Institute, Veterinary Animal Sciences University (TANUVAS), India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Umair Ahmad, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Osama Hefny Abdelshaffy Mahmoud Matloup, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Mehroz Latif, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised MS v2 and Feedback v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Genetic Variability, Heritability and Genetic Advance as Percent of Mean for Yield and Oil Traits in Maintainer and Restorer Lines of Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ravi Kant Chaturvedi, Chinese Academy of Sciences, P.R. China.

Reviewers:

(1) Fida Hussain, Ayub Agricultural Research Institute, Pakistan.

(2) Shehrooz Afzal, Punjab Group of Colleges, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Fida Hussain, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shehrooz Afzal, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practice of Basic Life Support among Healthcare Professionals in a Nigerian Tertiary Hospital

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Cristina-Crenguta Albu, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) M Bharath Bala, India.

(2) Sanmoy Chakraborty, Chittaranjan National Cancer Institute, India.

(3) M. Manimehalai, V.V.Vanniaperumal Nursing College for Women, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) M Bharath Bala    School of Allied Health Sciences, Vinayaka Mission’s Puducherry Campus, Vinayaka Mission’s Research Foundation- DU, India.

(2) Zenat Eldadamony Mohamed, Mansoura university hospital , Egypt.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (M Bharath Bala, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sanmoy Chakraborty, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (M. Manimehalai, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA