Peer Review History: Presuppositions in the Advertisement of New Energy Vehicles: A Pragmatic Study

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Dr. Abdullah Aydin, Kırşehir Ahi Evran University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Muhammad Hasyimsyah Batubara, STAIN Mandailing Natal, Indonesia.

(2) Safa Naji Abed, University of Babylon, Iraq.

(3) Jayashree Premkumar Shet, Qassim University, Saudi Arabia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Kateryna Lut, National University “Zaporizhzhia Polytechnic”, Ukraine.

(2) Safa Naji Abed, University of Babylon, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Muhammad Hasyimsyah Batubara, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Safa Naji Abed, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Jayashree Premkumar Shet, Saudi Arabia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised MS v1 and Feedback v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Revised MS v2 and Feedback v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Influence of Various Drying Methods on the Extraction of Alpinia galanga (L.) Willd. Essential Oil for Evaluating Yield Efficiency: A Comparative Study

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Anil Kumar, Sido-Khanu Murmu University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Vijay Kumar Singh, Mahamaya College of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, India.

(2) Njoku Isaac Saint, Caleb University, Imota, Lagos State, Nigeria.

(3) Sushilta Pradhan, North Bengal University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.62/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Vijay Kumar Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Njoku Isaac Saint, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sushilta Pradhan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised MS v1 and Feedback v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Study on the Translation of ASEAN Culture-loaded Words from the Perspective of Pragmatic Translation

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Dr. Abdullah Aydin, Kırşehir Ahi Evran University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Ibrahim Talaat Ibrahim, Al-Iraqia University – College of Arts, Iraq.

(2) Servais Dieu-Donne Yedia Dadjo, University of Abomey-Calavi, Benin.

(3) Sumera Adnan, Rawalpindi Women University, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Maria Shobeiry, University of Tehran, Iran.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ibrahim Talaat Ibrahim, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Servais Dieu-Donne Yedia Dadjo, Benin) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sumera Adnan, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised MS v1 and Feedback v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 4 | Revised MS v2 and Feedback v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of Biocontrol Potentiality of Bacillus subtilis on Aflatoxins Production in Grains

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Anil Kumar, Sido-Khanu Murmu University, India.

(2) Dr. Yi-Ren Hong, Kaohsiung Medical University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Ajaykumar Soma Kolhe, KBC North Maharashtra University, India.

(2) EDZILI AWONO Antoine Thierry, Federal University of Technology, Nigeria.

(3) Ikechukwu Harmony Iheukwumere, Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Afam-Ezeaku, Chikaodili Eziamaka, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Nigeria.

(2) Chinyerum Gloria Ikechi-Nwogu, University of Port Harcourt Choba, Nigeria.

(3) Huda Abdul Redha Abdullah, University of Kerbala, Iraq.

(4) Kelechi Nkechinyere, Enugu State University of Science and Technology, Nigeria.

(5) Shambhu Prasad, Lalit Narayan Mithila University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ajaykumar Soma Kolhe, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (EDZILI AWONO Antoine Thierry, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ikechukwu Harmony Iheukwumere, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised MS v1 and Feedback v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 4 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 5 | Revised MS v2 and Feedback v2 | File 1 | File 2


Peer Review History: Ethological Study of Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) in the Rehabilitation Process at Uganda Wildlife Conservation Education Center, Uganda

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fabricio Moraes de Almeida, Federal University of Rondonia, Campus de Porto Velho, Brasil.

Reviewers:

(1) Nofamataro Zebua, State University of Malang, Indonesia.

(2) Charles Kivasu Maingi, Kenya Institute of Primate Research, Kenya.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bichitra Hira, J.D.S.G.College, India.

(2) Luke Mangaliso Duncan, University of Warwick, United Kingdom.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nofamataro Zebua, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Charles Kivasu Maingi, Kenya) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Revised MS v1 and Feedback v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 4 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Antioxidant Properties of Piper guineense, Afromomum danielli and Afrostyrax lepidophyllus Essential Oils

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Golubkina Nadezhda Alexandrovna, All-Russian Institute of Vegetable Breeding And Seeds Production, Russia.

Reviewers:

(1) Engy Mahmoud Mohamed Mahmoud, National Research Center, Egypt.

(2) V.N.Meena Devi, Noorul Islam Centre for Higher Education, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Hanaa Mohamed Sakara, Egypt.

(2) Sababa Fatima, Afyon Kocatepe University, Turkey.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Engy Mahmoud Mohamed Mahmoud, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (V.N.Meena Devi, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Revised MS v1 and Feedback v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 4 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 5 | Revised MS v2 and Feedback v2 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 6 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 7 | Revised MS v3 and Feedback v3 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Exploring Novel Quinoxaline Derivatives as Potent Antiviral Agents: Synthesis and Biological Insights

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Fawzy Ramadan Hasssanien, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, KSA.

Reviewers:

(1) Ajay Singh Sarthi, Shri Rawatpura Sarkar University, India.

(2) Azmah Saat, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia.

(3) Manu Mitra, University of Bridgeport, USA.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Sonal Dubey, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ajay Singh Sarthi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Azmah Saat, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Manu Mitra, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised MS v1 and Feedback v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Nocardia corallina (Rhodococcus corallinus) Applicability for Bioremediation of Petroleum Wastes in Soil

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ravi Kant Chaturvedi, Chinese Academy of Sciences, P.R. China.

Reviewers:

(1) Osama Asanousi Eshteiwi Lamma, Bani Waleed University, Libya.

(2) Padmavathi Anduri, CH.S.D.ST.Theresa’s College for women (A), India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anas Mslim Almamoori, Al-Qasim Green University, Iraq.

(2) Eferhire Stephanie Akarator, United Kingdom.

(3) Idham Abed, University of Anbar, Iraq.

(4) Popa Maria, Petroleum-Gas University Of Ploiești, România.

(5) Vyacheslav Kuznetsov, Azerbaijan State University of Oil and Industry, Azerbaijan.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Osama Asanousi Eshteiwi Lamma, Libya) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Padmavathi Anduri, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised MS v1 and Feedback v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Review on Nutritional and Functional Benefits of Replacing Refined Wheat Flour with Millet Flour in Bakery Products

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Golubkina Nadezhda Alexandrovna, Agrochemical research center, Russia.

(2) Dr. Ghulam Khaliq, Lasbela University of Agriculture, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) M.R. Hemamalini, Dwaraka Doss Goverdhan Doss Vaishnav College, India.

(2) Pranay Sadawarti, Kamla Nehru Mahavidyalaya, Nagpur, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Chndrahas Sahu, DAU Shri Vasudev Chandrakar Kamdhenu Vishwavidyalaya, India.

(2) Lovina Inyang, Kent State University, United States.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (M.R. Hemamalini, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Pranay Sadawarti, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised MS v1 and Feedback v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Revised MS v2 and Feedback v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Attitude and Perception of Consumers’ towards Buying Organic Turmeric: A Study in Punjab, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Sanjay Mishra, SR Institute of Management & Technology, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Anup Nainabasti, Nepal.

(2) Tamalika Sikder, Gauhati Commerce College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Anup Nainabasti, Nepal) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Tamalika Sikder, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA