Peer Review History: The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Environmental Monitoring for Sustainable Development and Future Perspectives

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinayaka K.S, Sri Venkataramana Swamy College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Mustaq Ahmad Jabir Shaikh, India.

(2) Ankita Mitra, University of Haifa, Israel.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Padmaavathy PA, Ahalia School of Management, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mustaq Ahmad Jabir Shaikh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ankita Mitra, Israel) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Environmental Factors Responsible for Gastro-Intestinal Parasitosis in Primary School Children in the Fondonera, West-Cameroon

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Giuseppe Murdaca, University of Genoa, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) ESSIEN, Emmanuel Anietie, University of Uyo, Nigeria.

(2) Taher Elmi, School of Medicine, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ahmed Akil Khudhair Al-Daoody, Hawler Medical University, Iraq.

(2) Isaac Anim-Baidoo, University of Ghana, Ghana.

(3) Usman Ahmad, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (ESSIEN, Emmanuel Anietie, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Taher Elmi, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparative Analysis of Fresh and Stored Guava Ready to Serve Beverage

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. A. Elango, Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Salem, Tamil Nadu, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Suteera Vatthanakul, Thammasat University, Thailand.

(2) Muhammad Amir, Bahauddin Zakariya University Multan, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Suteera Vatthanakul, Thailand) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Muhammad Amir, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Distribution and Characterization of Microalgae from Chenab and Ravi River, Punjab Pakistan

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinayaka K.S, Sri Venkataramana Swamy College,  Karnataka, India.

Reviewers:

(1)  Morufat Li-Hammed, University of Lagos, Nigeria.

(2) Mahesh Ramchandra Tandale, Sant GAdge Baba Amravati University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1)  Kalyani Teku, Raghu Engineering College (A), India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Morufat Li-Hammed, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mahesh Ramchandra Tandale, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Hankel Determinant of Second Kind for a New Subclass of Analytic Functions Involving Chebyshev Polynomials

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Qiankun Song, Chongqing Jiaotong University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Ganesh Koride, Jyothishmathi Institute Of Technology And Science (Autonomous ), India.

(2) Neha Verma, Delhi Technological University, India.

(3) Mehrzad Ghorbani, Qom University of Technology (QUT), Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bassim Kareem Mihsin, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ganesh Koride, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Neha Verma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Mehrzad Ghorbani, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparative Assessment of Faecal Bacterial Contamination of Vegetables from the Central and Fresh Food Markets in Foumbot, West-Cameroon

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ravi Kant Chaturvedi, Chinese Academy of Sciences,P.R. China.

Reviewers:

(1) Abiyt Tenna Wondimu, Ethiopia.

(2) Ch. Lalitha, Dr. V. S. Krishna Govt. Degree and P.G College, India.

(3) Shilpa Mahapatra, SCB Dental College And Hospital, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Azam Shakeel, Aims International university College of Pharmacy Arifwala Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Abiyt Tenna Wondimu, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ch. Lalitha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Shilpa Mahapatra, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Unlocking the Potential of Nanopore Sequencing: Principles, Advances, and Challenges

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Yi-Ren Hong, Kaohsiung Medical University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Somsole Bharath, ICAR – Indian Agricultural Research Institute, India.

(2) Amanulla Khan, Degree College of Science, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Nalluri MallikarjunaRao, Indian Biomedical Innovation Centre, India.

(2) Saurabh Samdarshi, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Somsole Bharath, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Amanulla Khan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of the Effect of Scoparia dulcis (Sweet Broom Weed) on Blood Glucose Levels of Alloxan–Induced Diabetic Albino Rats

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. David E. Martin, TrippBio, Inc., USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Haruna Abubakar Danyaya, Hussaini Adamu Federal Polytechnic Kazaure, Nigeria.

(2) Salah M.M.AL-Chalabi, Biotechnology Research Center, AL-Nhrain University, Iraq.

(3) Annepaka Eliya Raju, Mamata Medical College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Jyotsna Pandit Khedkar, NES’s Gangamai College of Pharmacy, India.

(2) Owo Gogo James, Federal University, Nigeria.

(3) Saroj Yadav, Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research Center, Bhagwant University, India.

(4) T.Delphina, United College of Pharmacy, India.

(5) Vikas Bhausaheb Gawali, Msbte and Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar Technological University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.87/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Haruna Abubakar Danyaya, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Salah M.M.AL-Chalabi, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Annepaka Eliya Raju, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v3_and_Feedback_v3 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v3 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Review on Foxtail Millet Milk: Functional and Nutritional Aspects

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohd Saidin Misnan, Universiti Teknologi, Malaysia.

Reviewers:

(1) Kale Bala Nirmala, Professor Jayashankar Telangana Agricultural Uinversity, India.

(2) Yogita Rahul Mirajkar, College of Non Conventional Vocational Courses for Women, Kolhapur, India.

(3) Orekoya Elias Similoluwa, Augustine University Ilara-Epe, Nigeria.

(4) Hema Deupa, Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Saptarshi Mukherjee, Sikkim Skill University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kale Bala Nirmala, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Yogita Rahul Mirajkar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Orekoya Elias Similoluwa, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Hema Deupa, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Bridging the Rural-Urban Divide: A Systematic Review of Social Media’s Role in Connecting Farmers to Urban Markets

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ioannis A. Makedos, University of Macedonia, Thessaloniki, Greece.

Reviewers:

(1) Firozkhan Pathan, Visvesvarya Technological University, India.

(2) Sourabh Kumar, VKS College of Agriculture, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Firozkhan Pathan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sourabh Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA