Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Surendra Singh Bargali, Kumaun University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Rajpriya, Banaras Hindu University, India.

(2) Amilcar Isidro Servín Niz, Universidad Nacional de Concepción, Paraguay.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rajpriya, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Amilcar Isidro Servín Niz, Paraguay) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Pedro Antonio Hernandez Cruz, Autonomous University “Benito Juarez” of Oaxaca. México.

Reviewers:

(1) Rajesh Kumar Sharma, Agriculture University, India.

(2) Pradip Babanrao Kakade, Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rajesh Kumar Sharma, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Pradip Babanrao Kakade, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ioannis A. Makedos, University of Macedonia, Greece.

Reviewers:

(1) B.Devi Priya, PSGR Krishnammal College for Women, India.

(2) Simon T. Sebuliba, University of Eswatini, Eswatini.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (B.Devi Priya, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Simon T. Sebuliba, Eswatini) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. David E. Martin, TrippBio, Inc., USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Fawaz Parapurath, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

(2) Hermawan, Universitas Sains Al-Qur’an, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Fawaz Parapurath, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Hermawan, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Palle E. T. Jorgensen,  The University of Iowa, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Alka Gaur, Jigyasa University, India.

(2) Smrita Jain, Moradabad Institute Of Technology, India.

(3) Snehasis Dey, BPUT University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Alka Gaur, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Smrita Jain, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Snehasis Dey, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Seema Akbar, University of Kashmir, Kashmir, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Hemanshukumar J. Maisuria, Gujarat Biotechnology Research Center, India.

(2) Navnit Kumar, RPCAU, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hemanshukumar J. Maisuria, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Navnit Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Sanjay Mishra, Department of Biotechnology, SR Institute of Management & Technology, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Rama Shankar, Patanjali Research Foundation, India.

(2) Mohini Tawade, Dr. D. Y. Patil College of Pharmacy, India.

(3) Viktoriia Protska, National University of Pharmacy, Ukraine.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abhijeet Nanasaheb Pawar, Sadguru Gadage Maharaj College, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rama Shankar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mohini Tawade, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Viktoriia Protska, Ukraine) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Sanjay Mishra, Department of Biotechnology, SR Institute of Management & Technology, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Luis Daniel Carrillo Colín, UNAM, Mexico.

(2) Fawad Ali, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Helmi Caesar, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Luis Daniel Carrillo Colín, Mexico) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Fawad Ali, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rusu Teodor, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Lusi Herawati Suryaningrum, National Research and Innovation Agency, Republic of Indonesia.

(2) Rakesh Bhargava, RNB Global University, India.

(3) Merouani Amar, BBA University- Algeria, Algeria.

(4) Khodanitska Olena, Vinnytsia Mykhailo Kotsiubynskyi State Pedagogical University, Ukraine.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9.5

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Lusi Herawati Suryaningrum, Republic of Indonesia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rakesh Bhargava, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Merouani Amar, Algeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Khodanitska Olena, Ukraine) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Fabricio Moraes de Almeida, Federal University of Rondonia, Campus de Porto Velho, Brasil.

Reviewers:

(1) M Narasimha Raju, Shri Vishnu Engineering College for women, India.

(2) Sanjay Kumar, SRMU Lucknow, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (M Narasimha Raju, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sanjay Kumar,  India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA