Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Fawzy Ramadan Hasssanien, Umm Al-Qura University, KSA.

Reviewers:

(1) Arvind Kumar, AISECT University, India.

(2) Mohammad Imran, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Rabefiraisana Harimialimalala Jhonny, University of Antananarivo, Madagascar.

(2) Temesgen Teressa, Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, EIAR, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5+8+8+6=30.5/4=7.625

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Arvind Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mohammad Imran, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Palle E. T. Jorgensen, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Ludgardis Ledheng , University of Timor, Indonesia.

(2) Rahul Ratnakar Mahamuni, Gopinathrao Munde National Institute of Rural Development and Research- A Constitute Institute of Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ludgardis Ledheng, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rahul Ratnakar Mahamuni, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):
(1) Dr. Tin-Chun Lin, Indiana University Northwest, USA.
(2) Dr. Vlasta Hus, University of Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia.

Reviewers:
(1) Debi Kalyan Jayasingh, Odisha University of Agriculture and Technology, India.
(2) Lok Raj Sharma, Nepal.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anuj Sheopuri, Harlal Institute of Management & Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Debi Kalyan Jayasingh, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Lok Raj Sharma, Nepal) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):
(1) Dr. Vincenzo Tufarelli, University of Bari ‘Aldo Moro’, Italy.

Reviewers:
(1) Priyanka Gupta, Kalinga University, India.
(2) Bashkim Thaci, University of Prishtina, Republic of Kosovo.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Kamal Nabh Tripathi, Babu Banarasi Das University, India.

(2) Priyanka Gupta, Kalinga University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Priyanka Gupta, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Bashkim Thaci, Republic of Kosovo) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):
(1) Dr. Pradip K. Bhowmik, University of Nevada Las Vegas, USA.

Reviewers:
(1) Ali Hammoud Raheef Al-Shammari, Al-Muthanna University, Iraq.
(2) Sonja Ketin, “Tamis” Research and Development Institute, Serbia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ali Hammoud Raheef Al-Shammari, Iraq) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sonja Ketin, Serbia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinayaka K.S, Sri Venkataramana Swamy College, Karnataka, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Chetariya Chana P., Lovely Professional University, India.

(2) Eggadi Ramesh, Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalaya, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Waikhom Jupiter Singh, South Asian Institute of Rural and Agricultural Management (SAIRAM), India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Chetariya Chana P., India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Eggadi Ramesh, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Hon H. Ho, State University of New York, New Paltz,  USA.

Reviewers:

(1) V.Satyanarayana, M.A.M College of Pharmacy, India.

(2) Worachot Saengha, Mahasarakham University, Thailand.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (V.Satyanarayana, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Worachot Saengha, Thailand) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinayaka K.S, Sri Venkataramana Swamy College,  Karnataka, India.

(2) Dr. Vinayaka K.S, Sri Venkataramana Swamy College,  Karnataka, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Bhanu Murthy K C, Dr.YSR Horticultural University, India

(2) Taras Pasternak, University of Freiburg, Germany.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5+8+8+6=30.5/4=7.625

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Bhanu Murthy K C, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Taras Pasternak, Germany) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | J. ch from JOGAE to JOBAN | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Guanghua Han, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Malokhat Sultanova, University of Debrecen, Hungary.

(2) Lakshmi A.S, Coimbatore Institue of Mnanagement and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Malokhat Sultanova, Hungary) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Lakshmi A.S, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Afroz Alam, Banasthali  Vidyapith, India.

Reviewers:

(1) P.Ravishankar, University of Agricultural Sciences, India.

(2) Prince Kumar Gupta, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Chirag Gautam, Agriculture University, Kota, India.

(2) Jehani Muljibhai Dajabhai, Lovely Professional University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5+8+8+6=30.5/4=7.625

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (P.Ravishankar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Prince Kumar Gupta, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA