Peer Review History: User Perceptions of Environmental Design in Community Clinics: Evidence from Chattogram, Bangladesh

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinayaka K.S, Sri Venkataramana Swamy College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Kaltrina Thaci Cenaj, University of Prishtina, Kosovo.

(2) Ganjar Samudro, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abhishek Karn, Institute of Engineering (IOE), Pulchowk Campus, Tribhuvan University, Nepal.

(2) Chioma Lilian, Federal University of Technology, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kaltrina Thaci Cenaj, Kosovo) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ganjar Samudro, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Introduction of Insect Pollinators Associated with Niger [Guizotia abyssinica (L. f.) Cass.] Crop: A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinayaka K.S, Sri Venkataramana Swamy College,  Karnataka, India  .

Reviewers:

(1) Youssef SALAMA, University Moulay Ismail, Morocco.

(2) Idris Sari, Erzincan Binali Yildirim University, Turkey.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Priyanka Sharma, University of Rajasthan, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Youssef SALAMA, Morocco) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Idris Sari, Turkey) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: An Examination through Cross-culture of Ethnomedical Plants and Their Parts Used in Sindh Forest

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ahmed Fawzy Yousef, Desert Research Center, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) D. Sravani, Aditya college of Engineering and Technology, India.

(2) Shakir Ullah, Institute Of BotanyChinese Academy of Sciences Beijing, China.

(3) Md. Taleb Hossain Roman, International Islamic University Chittagong, Bangladesh.

(4) V. Rama Rao, CCRAS-Central Ayurveda Research Institute, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5+8+8+6=30.5/4=7.625

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (D. Sravani, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shakir Ullah, China) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Md. Taleb Hossain Roman, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 ((V. Rama Rao, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Potentials and Challenges of Ecotourism: A Study of Okrika, Oyigbo and Choba Communities in Rivers State

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinayaka K.S, Sri Venkataramana Swamy College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Anshima Srivastava, Bundelkhand University, India.

(2) Olakunle Muyiwa Orimaye, University of Ibadan, Nigeria.

(3) Bright O. Olunusi, Cornell University, Nigeria.

(4) Shashank Kishor Singh, University of Delhi, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Danjum John, Federal Unversity Wukari, Nigeria.

(2) Habib Ullah Nawab, University of Chitral, Pakistan.

(3) Sukanta Sarkar, Gambella University, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Anshima Srivastava, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Olakunle Muyiwa Orimaye, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Bright O. Olunusi, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Shashank Kishor Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Morphological Characterization of Guinea Grass (Megathyrsus maximus) Across a Ploidy Series in Semi-arid Conditions of Central India

Editor(s):
(1) Dr. Tsygankova Victoria Anatolyivna, Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry and Petrochemistry of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine.

Reviewers:
(1) Rudi Hari Murti, Gadjah Mada University, Indonesia.
(2) Muleta Debela Kumsa, Oromia Agricultural Research Institute, Bedele Agricultural Research Center, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Swathi Lekkala, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy:  Click Here

Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rudi Hari Murti, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Muleta Debela Kumsa, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Lecturers and Pre-service Teachers’ Perception on Usefulness of Gamified Learning Strategy for Teaching Science and Vocational Education in Oyo State Colleges of Education

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Tin-Chun Lin, Indiana University Northwest, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Zafar Siddique, The University of Okara, Pakistan.

(2) K.Ramesh, Anurag Engineering College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ika Parma Dewi, Universitas Negeri Padang, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.1/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Zafar Siddique, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (K.Ramesh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Arable Crop Farmers’ Awareness and Disposition Level to Organic Fertilizer in South – South, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ravi Kant Chaturvedi, Chinese Academy of Sciences, P.R. China.

Reviewers:

(1) Seyyed Akbar Sadaty, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

(2) Rafiu Adeniyi Mufutau, Olabisi Onabanjo University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Seyyed Akbar Sadaty, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rafiu Adeniyi Mufutau, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impact of Global Climate Change in the Distribution and the Range Dynamics of Endemic Orchid Habenaria suaveolens Dalzell in Northern Western Ghats of India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ravi Kant Chaturvedi, Chinese Academy of Sciences, P.R. China.

Reviewers:

(1) Erhan Unlu, University of Dicle, Turkey.

(2) Basavarajaiah DM, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Erhan Unlu, Turkey) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Basavarajaiah DM, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Development and Characterization of a PTFE-Based Electrochemical Cell Prototype

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Palle Jorgensen, University of Iowa, USA.

(2) Dr. Andrey Trubitsyn, Ryazan State Radio Engineering University, Russia.

Reviewers:

(1) Rakesh A. Afre, ZES’s Zeal College of Engineering and Research, India.

(2) Terngu Timothy Uzah, Federal University of Petroleum Resources, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) J.Dhilipan, SRM IST Ramapuram Campus Chennai, India.

(2) Kailash Kumar, Teerthanker Mahaveer University, India.

(3) S.Bagyalakshmi, United Institute of Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rakesh A. Afre, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Terngu Timothy Uzah, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Efficient In vitro Propagation and Optimized Multiple Shoot Induction of Caralluma bhupenderiana an Endangered Medicinal Plant

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Fawzy Ramadan Hasssanien, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, KSA.

Reviewers:

(1) Amirreza Zarrekarizi, New Zealand.

(2) Nogot Abdelaaziz, University of Moulay Ismail, Morocco.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Amirreza Zarrekarizi, New Zealand) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nogot Abdelaaziz, Morocco) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised MS v1 and Feedback v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA